Literature DB >> 31240463

Indications for resection and perioperative outcomes of surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in Germany: an analysis of the prospective DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

Ioannis Mintziras1, Tobias Keck2, Jens Werner3, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl4, Uwe Wittel4, Norbert Senninger5,6, Thorsten Vowinkel5,7, Jörg Köninger8, Matthias Anthuber9, Bernd Geißler9, Detlef Klaus Bartsch10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare, and their surgical management is complex. This study evaluated the current practice of pNEN surgery across Germany, including its adherence with guidelines and its perioperative outcomes.
METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for pNENs (April 2013-June 2017) were retrieved from the prospective StuDoQ|Pancreas registry of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery and retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 287 patients (53.7% male) with a mean age of 59.2 ± 14.2 years old underwent pancreatic resection for pNENs. Tumors were localized in the pancreatic head (40.4%), body (23%), or tail (36.6%). A total of 239 (83.3%) patients underwent formal resection with lymphadenectomy, 40 (14%) parenchyma-sparing resection, and 8 (2.8%) only exploration. Fifty (17.4%) patients underwent a minimally invasive approach. Among the 245 patients with complete pathological information, 42 (17.1%) had distant metastases, 78 (31.8%) had stage I tumors, 74 (30.2%) stage II, and 51 (20.8%) stage III. A total of 112 (45.7%) patients had G1 tumors, 101 (41.2%) G2, and 24 (9.8%) G3. Nodal involvement on imaging was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis according to the multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 0.057; 95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.209; p < 0.01). R0 resection was reported in 240 (83.6%) patients. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2.8% and 4.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In Germany the rate of potential curative resection for pNEN is high. However, formal pancreatic resection seems to be overrepresented, while minimally invasive resection is underrepresented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms; StuDoQ|Pancreas registry; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31240463     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01838-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  41 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic pancreatic resections for neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs).

Authors:  Domenico Tamburrino; Stefano Partelli; Claudio Renzi; Stefano Crippa; Francesca Muffatti; Carolina Perali; Amilcare Parisi; Justus Randolph; Giuseppe Kito Fusai; Roberto Cirocchi; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 2.  Quality Indicators in Pancreatic Surgery: Lessons Learned from the German DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas Registry.

Authors:  Ulrich F Wellner; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-30

3.  Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Nao Fujimori; Takashi Osoegawa; Lingaku Lee; Yuichi Tachibana; Akira Aso; Hiroaki Kubo; Ken Kawabe; Hisato Igarashi; Kazuhiko Nakamura; Yoshinao Oda; Tetsuhide Ito
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Major postoperative complications after pancreatic resection for P-NETS are not associated to earlier recurrence.

Authors:  R Valente; P Lykoudis; D Tamburrino; M Inama; I Passas; C Toumpanakis; T V Luong; B Davidson; C Imber; M Malagò; S H Rahman; A Shankar; D Sharma; M Caplin; G Fusai
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  [Surgery of tumors of the endocrine pancreas. Result of a survey made in the Federal Republic of Germany].

Authors:  F Kümmerle; K Rückert
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  1979-04-15       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  M Falconi; B Eriksson; G Kaltsas; D K Bartsch; J Capdevila; M Caplin; B Kos-Kudla; D Kwekkeboom; G Rindi; G Klöppel; N Reed; R Kianmanesh; R T Jensen
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.914

7.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Preoperative factors that predict lymph node metastases to guide operative strategy.

Authors:  Lauren M Postlewait; Cecilia G Ethun; Gillian G Baptiste; Nina Le; Mia R McInnis; Kenneth Cardona; Maria C Russell; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Charles A Staley; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Pre-operative Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors with Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in a Large Series.

Authors:  Raffaele Manta; Elisabetta Nardi; Nico Pagano; Claudio Ricci; Mariano Sica; Danilo Castellani; Helga Bertani; Micaela Piccoli; Barbara Mullineris; Alberto Tringali; Francesco Marini; Ugo Germani; Vincenzo Villanacci; Riccardo Casadei; Massimiliano Mutignani; Rita Conigliaro; Gabrio Bassotti; Angelo Zullo
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.008

9.  Surgical treatment and clinical outcome of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a 14-year experience from one single center.

Authors:  Min Yang; Lin Zeng; Yi Zhang; An-Ping Su; Peng-Ju Yue; Bo-le Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  A Nationwide Population-Based Study on the Survival of Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in The Netherlands.

Authors:  C G Genc; H J Klümpen; M G H van Oijen; C H J van Eijck; E J M Nieveen van Dijkum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Lymph Node Metastases of Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Masayuki Tanaka; Max Heckler; André L Mihaljevic; Pascal Probst; Ulla Klaiber; Ulrike Heger; Simon Schimmack; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Evaluation of Risk Factors for Distant and Lymph Node Metastasis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Bartosz Molasy; Patryk Zemła; Sławomir Mrowiec; Ewa Grudzińska; Katarzyna Kuśnierz
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.