BACKGROUND: Enucleation and anatomic resection (central, distal, or pancreaticoduodenectomy) are surgical options for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Depending on nodal-status, enucleation alone may not be oncologically appropriate. Preoperative factors predictive of nodal-involvement are not well defined. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative-intent enucleation or resection of non-metastatic, well/moderately differentiated tumors at a single institution (2000-2014) were included. The aim was to determine factors associated with nodal-metastases and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Of 195 patients undergoing resection, 164 met inclusion-criteria. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 131 (80%), and 32 (24%) had nodal-metastases. Receiver-operative-characteristics analysis revealed tumor size ≥2 cm was associated with nodal-involvement (AUC: 0.689; Sensitivity: 90%; Specificity: 53%). On multivariable analysis, male gender (OR: 3.16; 95%CI: 1.18-8.46; P = 0.02), head/uncinate location (HR: 5.37; 95%CI: 2.07-13.96; P = 0.001), and size ≥2 cm (HR: 6.52; 95%CI: 1.75-24.30; P = 0.005) were associated with nodal-positivity. Nodal-metastases (HR: 3.04; 95%CI: 1.04-8.91; P = 0.043) and advanced T-stage (HR: 5.39; 95%CI: 1.46-19.95; P = 0.012) were independently associated with decreased recurrence-free survival. Enucleation (n = 17; 10%) had more positive margins and similar complication rates, pancreatic fistula rates, and lengths of stay as anatomic resections. CONCLUSION: For pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, male gender, head/uncinate location, and size ≥2 cm are associated with nodal-metastases. Nodal involvement is associated with decreased recurrence-free survival. Anatomic resection may be preferred in patients with these characteristics, as enucleation alone may under-stage patients and does not appear to be associated with an improved complication profile. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:440-445.
BACKGROUND: Enucleation and anatomic resection (central, distal, or pancreaticoduodenectomy) are surgical options for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Depending on nodal-status, enucleation alone may not be oncologically appropriate. Preoperative factors predictive of nodal-involvement are not well defined. METHODS:Patients who underwent curative-intent enucleation or resection of non-metastatic, well/moderately differentiated tumors at a single institution (2000-2014) were included. The aim was to determine factors associated with nodal-metastases and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Of 195 patients undergoing resection, 164 met inclusion-criteria. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 131 (80%), and 32 (24%) had nodal-metastases. Receiver-operative-characteristics analysis revealed tumor size ≥2 cm was associated with nodal-involvement (AUC: 0.689; Sensitivity: 90%; Specificity: 53%). On multivariable analysis, male gender (OR: 3.16; 95%CI: 1.18-8.46; P = 0.02), head/uncinate location (HR: 5.37; 95%CI: 2.07-13.96; P = 0.001), and size ≥2 cm (HR: 6.52; 95%CI: 1.75-24.30; P = 0.005) were associated with nodal-positivity. Nodal-metastases (HR: 3.04; 95%CI: 1.04-8.91; P = 0.043) and advanced T-stage (HR: 5.39; 95%CI: 1.46-19.95; P = 0.012) were independently associated with decreased recurrence-free survival. Enucleation (n = 17; 10%) had more positive margins and similar complication rates, pancreatic fistula rates, and lengths of stay as anatomic resections. CONCLUSION: For pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, male gender, head/uncinate location, and size ≥2 cm are associated with nodal-metastases. Nodal involvement is associated with decreased recurrence-free survival. Anatomic resection may be preferred in patients with these characteristics, as enucleation alone may under-stage patients and does not appear to be associated with an improved complication profile. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:440-445.
Authors: James R Howe; Nipun B Merchant; Claudius Conrad; Xavier M Keutgen; Julie Hallet; Jeffrey A Drebin; Rebecca M Minter; Terry C Lairmore; Jennifer F Tseng; Herbert J Zeh; Steven K Libutti; Gagandeep Singh; Jeffrey E Lee; Thomas A Hope; Michelle K Kim; Yusuf Menda; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jennifer A Chan; Rodney F Pommier Journal: Pancreas Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Ding Ding; Ammar A Javed; Chunhui Yuan; Michael J Wright; Zunaira N Javed; Jonathan A Teinor; I Chae Ye; Richard A Burkhart; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Masayuki Tanaka; Max Heckler; André L Mihaljevic; Pascal Probst; Ulla Klaiber; Ulrike Heger; Simon Schimmack; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Alexander V Fisher; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Victoria R Rendell; Courtney Pokrzywa; Flavio G Rocha; Zaheer S Kanji; George A Poultsides; Eleftherios A Makris; Mary E Dillhoff; Eliza W Beal; Ryan C Fields; Roheena Z Panni; Kamran Idrees; Paula Marincola Smith; Clifford S Cho; Megan V Beems; Shishir K Maithel; Emily R Winslow; Daniel E Abbott; Sharon M Weber Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kota Sahara; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Rittal Mehta; Amika Moro; Anghela Z Paredes; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Flavio Rocha; Zaheer Kanji; Sharon Weber; Alexander Fisher; Ryan Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Paula M Smith; George A Poultsides; Eleftherios Makris; Cliff Cho; Megan Beems; Mary Dillhoff; Shishir K Maithel; Itaru Endo; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-12-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Adriana C Gamboa; Yuan Liu; Rachel M Lee; Mohammad Y Zaidi; Charles A Staley; David A Kooby; Joshua H Winer; Mihir M Shah; Maria C Russell; Kenneth Cardona; Shishir K Maithel Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 3.454