| Literature DB >> 31239492 |
Do-Yeon Lee1, Seong-Min Kang1, Seong-Wook Choi2.
Abstract
When a cardiac arrest occurs, it is necessary to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as soon as possible. This requires maintaining the pressure depth at 5 cm at a rate of 100 cpm. For CPR machines, which are frequently used in ambulances, the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is not superior to that of manual CPR, although CPR machines can maintain the compression rate and reciprocal distance of the compression plate more accurately. When the thoracic cavity is deformed due to repeated chest compressions, CPR machines must be adjusted. It is necessary to develop a method for measuring whether adequate CPR is achieved using CPR machines. CPR was performed on two pigs with a CPR machine, commencing 1 minute after the heart was stopped. Four CPR modes were used, with compression rates of 60 or 100 cpm and compression depths of 3 or 5 cm. The CPR machine was equipped with a load cell for measuring compression force, and a potentiometer for measuring compression depth. The measurement results obtained from the sensor were used to calculate the frequency components. The compression force and depth data were used to calculate the mechanical power of the CPR machine and mechanical impedance of the thoracic cavity. Changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), carotid blood flow (CBF), and right atrial pressure (RAP) were measured during performance of CPR; change in RAP refers to variation therein with chest compressions. Continuous CPR in both animals resulted in deformation of the chest cavity and a steady decline in impedance. The correlation between CPR power and change in RAP was 0.78, and that between compression force and CBF was 0.64. Impedance was not correlated with blood pressure or CBF. When the condition of the animal deteriorated due to cardiac arrest, the CPP decreased and ETCO2 increased. The CPR power and RAP varied according to the CPR mode rather than the condition of the animal. Measuring the CPR machine power does not require a separate procedure, such as catheter intubation, so should be suitable as an index of the quality of CPR in emergency situations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31239492 PMCID: PMC6592918 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45749-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Animal experiment performed using an automatic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) machine.
Figure 2Factor of compression force at compression frequency F(ksf), during single-frequency analysis (SFA) under various CPR modes in animal #1.
Figure 3Impedance during CPR in animals #1 and #2.
Figure 4Impedance during CPR mode a.
Mean (±standard deviation) compression forces derived from single-frequency analysis of the raw data.
| Animal #1 | Animal #2 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a1 | a2 | a3 | b | c | d | a1 | a2 | a3 | b | c | d | |
| Compression rate (cpm), depth (cm) | 60, 3 | 100, 3 | 60, 5 | 100, 5 | 60, 3 | 100, 3 | 60, 5 | 100, 5 | ||||
| 17.1 ± 12.36 | 11.83 ± 8.97 | 11.3 ± 8.32 | 15.52 ± 11.25 | 13.78 ± 12.01 | 16.89 ± 13.37 | 13.53 ± 9.73 | 11.74 ± 7.29 | 11.46 ± 7.08 | 13.31 ± 8.40 | 13.75 ± 10.77 | 18.24 ± 13.16 | |
| 11.85 ± 0.37 | 8.36 ± 0.20 | 7.85 ± 0.26 | 13.28 ± 0.42 | 12.32 ± 0.37 | 16.97 ± 1.41 | 9.77 ± 0.41 | 6.72 ± 0.31 | 6.55 ± 0.22 | 9.87 ± 0.20 | 6.55 ± 0.31 | 16.82 ± 0.39 | |
Figure 5Changes in right atrial pressure (RAP) and mechanical power of the CPR machine in (a) animal #1 and (b) animal #2.
Mean (±standard deviation) compression forces derived from single-frequency analysis, plus mechanical impedance, CPR power and biometric parameters.
| CPR mode (number of data points) | Animal #1 | Animal #2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a (120) | b (200) | c (120) | d (200) | a (120) | b (200) | c (120) | d (200) | |
| Compression rate, depth | 60 cpm, 3 cm | 100 cpm, 3 cm | 60 cpm, 5 cm | 100 cpm, 5 cm | 60 cpm, 3 cm | 100 cpm, 3 cm | 60 cpm, 5 cm | 100 cpm, 5 cm |
| 11.85 ± 0.37 | 13.28 ± 0.42 | 12.32 ± 0.37 | 16.97 ± 1.41 | 9.77 ± 0.41 | 9.87 ± 0.20 | 11.05 ± 0.31 | 16.82 ± 0.39 | |
| Impedance (kg∙s/m) | 169.35 ± 12.34 | 67.83 ± 2.37 | 117.01 ± 5.49 | 73.46 ± 7.97 | 114.25 ± 7.41 | 50.19 ± 1.92 | 98.01 ± 4.54 | 68.66 ± 2.05 |
| Power (W) | 4.07 ± 0.15 | 12.75 ± 0.65 | 6.37 ± 0.30 | 19.24 ± 1.56 | 4.10 ± 0.19 | 9.53 ± 0.37 | 6.11 ± 0.38 | 20.19 ± 0.70 |
| CPP (mmHg) | 10.80 ± 0.58 | 22.65 ± 1.91 | 18.03 ± 3.37 | 8.25 ± 0.73 | 8.79 ± 1.67 | 10.55 ± 1.85 | 13.53 ± 1.54 | 11.07 ± 4.26 |
| RAP (mmHg) | 7.80 ± 1.99 | 28.96 ± 2.49 | 33.98 ± 4.59 | 52.07 ± 7.35 | 12.12 ± 8.18 | 22.41 ± 2.66 | 20.81 ± 1.13 | 30.11 ± 4.61 |
| ETCO2 (mmHg) | 15.47 ± 2.78 | 22.01 ± 4.89 | 15.01 ± 2.19 | 17.01 ± 2.49 | 22.19 ± 4.83 | 34.92 ± 0.91 | 36.08 ± 4.51 | 32.27 ± 2.09 |
| CBF (ml/min) | 17.93 ± 2.55 | 46.34 ± 7.43 | 21.48 ± 6.46 | 59.19 ± 11.55 | 21.90 ± 3.31 | 55.34 ± 8.41 | 42.52 ± 15.38 | 53.92 ± 12.79 |
| ABP (mmHg) | 6.03 ± 0.99 | 16.64 ± 2.30 | 18.11 ± 1.44 | 30.54 ± 4.42 | 8.31 ± 1.57 | 14.48 ± 2.42 | 15.04 ± 1.64 | 19.06 ± 8.04 |
Figure 6Relationships of biometric data, CPR power and mechanical impedance under the various CPR modes.