Maryam Y Naim1, Robert M Sutton, Stuart H Friess, George Bratinov, Utpal Bhalala, Todd J Kilbaugh, Joshua W Lampe, Vinay M Nadkarni, Lance B Becker, Robert A Berg. 1. 1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 2Department of Pediatrics, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 3Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Bloomberg Children's Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 4Department of Emergency Medicine, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Treatment algorithms for cardiac arrest are rescuer centric and vary little from patient to patient. The objective of this study was to determine if cardiopulmonary resuscitation-targeted to arterial blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure rather than optimal guideline care would improve 24-hour survival in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. DATA SOURCES: Preclinical animal laboratory using female 3-month-old swine. STUDY SELECTION: A randomized interventional study. DATA EXTRACTION: After induction of anesthesia and 7 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, 16 female 3-month-old swine were randomized to 1) blood pressure care: titration of chest compression depth to a systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg and vasopressor dosing to maintain coronary perfusion pressure of greater than 20 mm Hg or 2) guideline care: chest compression depth targeted to 51 mm and standard guideline vasopressor dosing. Animals received manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 10 minutes before the first defibrillation attempt and standardized postresuscitation care for 24 hours. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-four-hour survival was more likely with blood pressure care versus guideline care (0/8 vs 5/8; p < 0.03), and all survivors had normal neurologic examinations. Mean coronary perfusion pressure prior to defibrillation was significantly higher with blood pressure care (28 ± 3 vs 10 ± 6 mm Hg; p < 0.01). Chest compression depth was lower with blood pressure care (48 ± 0.4 vs 44 ± 0.5 mm Hg; p < 0.05), and the number of vasopressor doses was higher with blood pressure care (median, 3 [range, 1-7] vs 2 [range, 2-2]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Individualized goal-directed hemodynamic resuscitation targeting systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg and coronary perfusion pressure of greater than 20 mm Hg improved 24-hour survival compared with guideline care in this model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.
OBJECTIVES: Treatment algorithms for cardiac arrest are rescuer centric and vary little from patient to patient. The objective of this study was to determine if cardiopulmonary resuscitation-targeted to arterial blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure rather than optimal guideline care would improve 24-hour survival in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. DATA SOURCES: Preclinical animal laboratory using female 3-month-old swine. STUDY SELECTION: A randomized interventional study. DATA EXTRACTION: After induction of anesthesia and 7 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, 16 female 3-month-old swine were randomized to 1) blood pressure care: titration of chest compression depth to a systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg and vasopressor dosing to maintain coronary perfusion pressure of greater than 20 mm Hg or 2) guideline care: chest compression depth targeted to 51 mm and standard guideline vasopressor dosing. Animals received manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 10 minutes before the first defibrillation attempt and standardized postresuscitation care for 24 hours. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-four-hour survival was more likely with blood pressure care versus guideline care (0/8 vs 5/8; p < 0.03), and all survivors had normal neurologic examinations. Mean coronary perfusion pressure prior to defibrillation was significantly higher with blood pressure care (28 ± 3 vs 10 ± 6 mm Hg; p < 0.01). Chest compression depth was lower with blood pressure care (48 ± 0.4 vs 44 ± 0.5 mm Hg; p < 0.05), and the number of vasopressor doses was higher with blood pressure care (median, 3 [range, 1-7] vs 2 [range, 2-2]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Individualized goal-directed hemodynamic resuscitation targeting systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg and coronary perfusion pressure of greater than 20 mm Hg improved 24-hour survival compared with guideline care in this model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.
Authors: Robert W Neumar; Charles W Otto; Mark S Link; Steven L Kronick; Michael Shuster; Clifton W Callaway; Peter J Kudenchuk; Joseph P Ornato; Bryan McNally; Scott M Silvers; Rod S Passman; Roger D White; Erik P Hess; Wanchun Tang; Daniel Davis; Elizabeth Sinz; Laurie J Morrison Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mark S Link; Lauren C Berkow; Peter J Kudenchuk; Henry R Halperin; Erik P Hess; Vivek K Moitra; Robert W Neumar; Brian J O'Neil; James H Paxton; Scott M Silvers; Roger D White; Demetris Yannopoulos; Michael W Donnino Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Peter A Meaney; Bentley J Bobrow; Mary E Mancini; Jim Christenson; Allan R de Caen; Farhan Bhanji; Benjamin S Abella; Monica E Kleinman; Dana P Edelson; Robert A Berg; Tom P Aufderheide; Venu Menon; Marion Leary Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Allan R de Caen; Marc D Berg; Leon Chameides; Cheryl K Gooden; Robert W Hickey; Halden F Scott; Robert M Sutton; Janice A Tijssen; Alexis Topjian; Élise W van der Jagt; Stephen M Schexnayder; Ricardo A Samson Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dana P Edelson; Benjamin S Abella; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Lars Wik; Helge Myklebust; Anne M Barry; Raina M Merchant; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Petter A Steen; Lance B Becker Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Peter A Meaney; Vinay M Nadkarni; Karl B Kern; Julia H Indik; Henry R Halperin; Robert A Berg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Stuart H Friess; Robert M Sutton; Benjamin French; Utpal Bhalala; Matthew R Maltese; Maryam Y Naim; George Bratinov; Silvana Arciniegas Rodriguez; Theodore R Weiland; Mia Garuccio; Vinay M Nadkarni; Lance B Becker; Robert A Berg Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Richard Holubkov; Carol E Nicholson; J Michael Dean; Rick Harrison; Sabrina Heidemann; Kathleen Meert; Christopher Newth; Frank Moler; Murray Pollack; Heidi Dalton; Allan Doctor; David Wessel; John Berger; Thomas Shanley; Joseph Carcillo; Vinay M Nadkarni Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jennifer L Hamrick; Justin T Hamrick; Caitlin E O'Brien; Michael Reyes; Polan T Santos; Sophie E Heitmiller; Ewa Kulikowicz; Jennifer K Lee; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Raymond C Koehler; Elizabeth A Hunt; Donald H Shaffner Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Justin T Hamrick; Jennifer L Hamrick; Utpal Bhalala; Jillian S Armstrong; Jeong-Hoo Lee; Ewa Kulikowicz; Jennifer K Lee; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Raymond C Koehler; Elizabeth A Hunt; Donald H Shaffner Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Caitlin E O'Brien; Polan T Santos; Michael Reyes; Shawn Adams; C Danielle Hopkins; Ewa Kulikowicz; Jennifer L Hamrick; Justin T Hamrick; Jennifer K Lee; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Elizabeth A Hunt; Raymond C Koehler; Donald H Shaffner Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2019-08-04 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Robert M Sutton; Ron W Reeder; William P Landis; Kathleen L Meert; Andrew R Yates; Ryan W Morgan; John T Berger; Christopher J Newth; Joseph A Carcillo; Patrick S McQuillen; Rick E Harrison; Frank W Moler; Murray M Pollack; Todd C Carpenter; Daniel A Notterman; Richard Holubkov; J Michael Dean; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Ron W Reeder; John T Berger; Christopher J Newth; Joseph A Carcillo; Patrick S McQuillen; Kathleen L Meert; Andrew R Yates; Rick E Harrison; Frank W Moler; Murray M Pollack; Todd C Carpenter; David L Wessel; Tammara L Jenkins; Daniel A Notterman; Richard Holubkov; Robert F Tamburro; J Michael Dean; Vinay M Nadkarni Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ryan W Morgan; Robert M Sutton; Adam S Himebauch; Anna L Roberts; William P Landis; Yuxi Lin; Jonathan Starr; Abhay Ranganathan; Nile Delso; Constantine D Mavroudis; Lindsay Volk; Julia Slovis; Alexandra M Marquez; Vinay M Nadkarni; Marco Hefti; Robert A Berg; Todd J Kilbaugh Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Tom P Aufderheide; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2021-02-20 Impact factor: 5.691