Literature DB >> 31237419

Improvements to the Escalation with Overdose Control design and a comparison with the restricted Continual Reassessment Method.

Lingyun Ji1, Juan Pablo Lewinger1, Mark Krailo1, Susan Groshen1, David V Conti1, Shahab Asgharzadeh2, Richard Sposto1.   

Abstract

The Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) design for cancer dose finding clinical trials is a variation of the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) that was proposed to overcome the limitation of the original CRM of exposing patients to high toxic doses. The properties of EWOC have been studied to some extent, but some aspects of the design are not well studied, and its performance is not fully understood. Comparisons of the EWOC design to the most commonly used modified CRM designs have not yet been performed, and the advantages of EWOC over the modified CRM designs are unclear. In this paper, we assess the properties of the EWOC design and of the restricted CRM and some variations of these designs. We show that EWOC has several weaknesses that CRM does not have that make it impractical to use in its original formulation. We propose modified EWOC designs that address some of the weaknesses and that have some desirable statistical properties compared with the original EWOC design, the restricted CRM design, and the 3 + 3 design. However, their statistical properties are sensitive to correct specification of the prior distribution of their parameters and hence nevertheless will need to be used with some caution. The restricted CRM design is shown to have more stable performance across a wider family of dose-toxicity curves than EWOC and therefore may be a preferable general choice in cancer clinical research.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; CRM; EWOC; Phase I; dose finding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31237419      PMCID: PMC8932137          DOI: 10.1002/pst.1955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  15 in total

1.  Continual reassessment method with multiple toxicity constraints.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Bin Cheng; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Translation of innovative designs into phase I trials.

Authors:  André Rogatko; David Schoeneck; William Jonas; Mourad Tighiouart; Fadlo R Khuri; Alan Porter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Practical implementation of a modified continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials.

Authors:  S Piantadosi; J D Fisher; S Grossman
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

Authors:  S N Goodman; M L Zahurak; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Practical modifications of the continual reassessment method for phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  D Faries
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  A comparison of two phase I trial designs.

Authors:  E L Korn; D Midthune; T T Chen; L V Rubinstein; M C Christian; R M Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.