Baiyan Jiang1, Tao Jin2, Thierry Blu3, Weitian Chen1. 1. Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, The Republic of China. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Electrical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, The Republic of China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: CEST is commonly used to probe the effects of chemical exchange. Although R1ρ asymmetry quantification has also been described as a promising option for detecting the effects of chemical exchanges, the existing acquisition approaches are highly susceptible to B1 RF and B0 field inhomogeneities. To address this problem, we report a new R1ρ asymmetry imaging approach, AC-iTIP, which is based on the previously reported techniques of irradiation with toggling inversion preparation (iTIP) and adiabatic continuous wave constant amplitude spin-lock RF pulses (ACCSL). We also derived the optimal spin-lock RF pulse B1 amplitude that yielded the greatest R1ρ asymmetry. METHODS: Bloch-McConnell simulations were used to verify the analytical formula derived for the optimal spin-lock RF pulse B1 amplitude. The performance of the AC-iTIP approach was compared to that of the iTIP approach based on hard RF pulses and the R1ρ -spectrum acquired using adiabatic RF pulses with the conventional fitting method. Comparisons were performed using Bloch-McConnell simulations, phantom, and in vivo experiments at 3.0T. RESULTS: The analytical prediction of the optimal B1 was validated. Compared to the other 2 approaches, the AC-iTIP approach was more robust under the influences of B1 RF and B0 field inhomogeneities. A linear relationship was observed between the measured R1ρ asymmetry and the metabolite concentration. CONCLUSION: The AC-iTIP approach could probe the chemical exchange effect more robustly than the existing R1ρ asymmetry acquisition approaches. Therefore, AC-iTIP is a promising technique for metabolite imaging based on the chemical exchange effect.
PURPOSE: CEST is commonly used to probe the effects of chemical exchange. Although R1ρ asymmetry quantification has also been described as a promising option for detecting the effects of chemical exchanges, the existing acquisition approaches are highly susceptible to B1 RF and B0 field inhomogeneities. To address this problem, we report a new R1ρ asymmetry imaging approach, AC-iTIP, which is based on the previously reported techniques of irradiation with toggling inversion preparation (iTIP) and adiabatic continuous wave constant amplitude spin-lock RF pulses (ACCSL). We also derived the optimal spin-lock RF pulse B1 amplitude that yielded the greatest R1ρ asymmetry. METHODS: Bloch-McConnell simulations were used to verify the analytical formula derived for the optimal spin-lock RF pulse B1 amplitude. The performance of the AC-iTIP approach was compared to that of the iTIP approach based on hard RF pulses and the R1ρ -spectrum acquired using adiabatic RF pulses with the conventional fitting method. Comparisons were performed using Bloch-McConnell simulations, phantom, and in vivo experiments at 3.0T. RESULTS: The analytical prediction of the optimal B1 was validated. Compared to the other 2 approaches, the AC-iTIP approach was more robust under the influences of B1 RF and B0 field inhomogeneities. A linear relationship was observed between the measured R1ρ asymmetry and the metabolite concentration. CONCLUSION: The AC-iTIP approach could probe the chemical exchange effect more robustly than the existing R1ρ asymmetry acquisition approaches. Therefore, AC-iTIP is a promising technique for metabolite imaging based on the chemical exchange effect.
Authors: Jun Hua; Craig K Jones; Jaishri Blakeley; Seth A Smith; Peter C M van Zijl; Jinyuan Zhou Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Patrick Schuenke; Christina Koehler; Andreas Korzowski; Johannes Windschuh; Peter Bachert; Mark E Ladd; Sibu Mundiyanapurath; Daniel Paech; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; David Bonekamp; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Alexander Radbruch; Moritz Zaiss Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-08-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jinyuan Zhou; Jaishri O Blakeley; Jun Hua; Mina Kim; John Laterra; Martin G Pomper; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Elena Vinogradov; Huamei He; Angelo Lubag; James A Balschi; A Dean Sherry; Robert E Lenkinski Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jinyuan Zhou; Erik Tryggestad; Zhibo Wen; Bachchu Lal; Tingting Zhou; Rachel Grossman; Silun Wang; Kun Yan; De-Xue Fu; Eric Ford; Betty Tyler; Jaishri Blakeley; John Laterra; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Nat Med Date: 2010-12-19 Impact factor: 53.440