Literature DB >> 31236791

Analysis of Inlet Velocity Profiles in Numerical Assessment of Fontan Hemodynamics.

Zhenglun Alan Wei1, Connor Huddleston2, Phillip M Trusty1, Shelly Singh-Gryzbon1, Mark A Fogel3, Alessandro Veneziani4, Ajit P Yoganathan5.   

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations are widely utilized to assess Fontan hemodynamics that are related to long-term complications. No previous studies have systemically investigated the effects of using different inlet velocity profiles in Fontan simulations. This study implements real, patient-specific velocity profiles for numerical assessment of Fontan hemodynamics using CFD simulations. Four additional, artificial velocity profiles were used for comparison: (1) flat, (2) parabolic, (3) Womersley, and (4) parabolic with inlet extensions [to develop flow before entering the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC)]. The differences arising from the five velocity profiles, as well as discrepancies between the real and each of the artificial velocity profiles, were quantified by examining clinically important metrics in TCPC hemodynamics: power loss (PL), viscous dissipation rate (VDR), hepatic flow distribution, and regions of low wall shear stress. Statistically significant differences were observed in PL and VDR between simulations using real and flat velocity profiles, but differences between those using real velocity profiles and the other three artificial profiles did not reach statistical significance. These conclusions suggest that the artificial velocity profiles (2)-(4) are acceptable surrogates for real velocity profiles in Fontan simulations, but parabolic profiles are recommended because of their low computational demands and prevalent applicability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational fluid dynamics; Fontan hemodynamics; Inlet velocity profiles

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31236791      PMCID: PMC6842101          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-019-02307-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  29 in total

1.  Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known.

Authors:  J R WOMERSLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1955-03-28       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Reliable CFD-based estimation of flow rate in haemodynamics measures.

Authors:  Raffaele Ponzini; Christian Vergara; Alberto Redaelli; Alessandro Veneziani
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Benchmark problems for numerical treatment of backflow at open boundaries.

Authors:  Cristóbal Bertoglio; Alfonso Caiazzo; Yuri Bazilevs; Malte Braack; Mahdi Esmaily; Volker Gravemeier; Alison L Marsden; Olivier Pironneau; Irene E Vignon-Clementel; Wolfgang A Wall
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Analysis of the effects of different pulsatile inlet profiles on the hemodynamical properties of blood flow in patient specific carotid artery with stenosis.

Authors:  Senol Piskin; M Serdar Celebi
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  The effect of respiration-driven flow waveforms on hemodynamic metrics used in Fontan surgical planning.

Authors:  Elaine Tang; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Phillip M Trusty; Kevin K Whitehead; Lucia Mirabella; Alessandro Veneziani; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Rapid onset of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations after cavopulmonary anastomosis.

Authors:  U M Pandurangi; M J Shah; R Murali; K M Cherian
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  The Advantages of Viscous Dissipation Rate over Simplified Power Loss as a Fontan Hemodynamic Metric.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Michael Tree; Phillip M Trusty; Wenjun Wu; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Ajit Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Valve mediated hemodynamics and their association with distal ascending aortic diameter in bicuspid aortic valve subjects.

Authors:  Vrishank Raghav; Alex J Barker; Daniel Mangiameli; Lucia Mirabella; Michael Markl; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Fontan Surgical Planning: Previous Accomplishments, Current Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Phillip M Trusty; Timothy C Slesnick; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Jarek Rossignac; Kirk R Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Impact of Patient-Specific Inflow Velocity Profile on Hemodynamics of the Thoracic Aorta.

Authors:  Pouya Youssefi; Alberto Gomez; Christopher Arthurs; Rajan Sharma; Marjan Jahangiri; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  8 in total

1.  A Simplified In Silico Model of Left Ventricular Outflow in Patients After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement with Anterior Leaflet Laceration.

Authors:  Keshav Kohli; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Vahid Sadri; Tiffany Netto; John C Lisko; Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis Babaliaros; John N Oshinski; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Computational Investigation of Anastomosis Options of a Right-Heart Pump to Patient Specific Pulmonary Arteries.

Authors:  Nicolas Tobin; Bryan C Good; Jonathan D Plasencia; Mark A Fogel; William J Weiss; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Support for Fontan Planning in Minutes, Not Hours: The Next Step in Clinical Pre-Interventional Simulations.

Authors:  Petter Frieberg; Nicolas Aristokleous; Pia Sjöberg; Johannes Töger; Petru Liuba; Marcus Carlsson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Zhenglun Wei; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Phillip M Trusty; Connor Huddleston; Yingnan Zhang; Mark A Fogel; Alessandro Veneziani; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Comparison of Fontan Surgical Options for Patients with Apicocaval Juxtaposition.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Camille Johnson; Phillip Trusty; Morgan Stephens; Wenjun Wu; Ritchie Sharon; Balaji Srimurugan; Brijesh P Kottayil; G S Sunil; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mahesh Kappanayil
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of an Intra-Atrial Fontan Connection.

Authors:  Elaine Tang; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Mark A Fogel; Alessandro Veneziani; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24

7.  Engineering Perspective on Cardiovascular Simulations of Fontan Hemodynamics: Where Do We Stand with a Look Towards Clinical Application.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.495

8.  Is Doppler Echocardiography Adequate for Surgical Planning of Single Ventricle Patients?

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Biao Si; Xiaoqian Ge; Meng Zhu; Maria A Cetatoiu; Chenze Tian; Lixin Sun; Bin Qiao
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.495

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.