Literature DB >> 31236658

Accurate prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction following posterior selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using logistic regression models and clinical rationale.

H Koller1,2, W Hitzl3, M C Marks4, P O Newton5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accurate prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC) after selective thoracic fusion (STF) remains difficult. This study sought to improve prediction accuracy of SLCC. The hypothesis was preoperative and intraoperative variables could predict SLCC < 20°.
METHODS: A multicenter observational prospective analysis was conducted to determine predictors of SLCC in AIS patients that had posterior STF. Curve types included major thoracic curves (Lenke 1, 3-4).The primary outcome variable was to establish prediction models, and a postoperative lumbar curve (LC) ≤ 20° was defined as the target variable. Multivariate logistic regression models were established to study the relationship between selected variables and a LC ≤ 20° versus a LC > 20° at ≥ 2-year follow-up. Single and dual thresholds models in perspective of clinical rationales were applied to find models with the highest positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV). The secondary outcome measure was SRS scores at ≥ 2-year follow-up.
RESULTS: 410 patients were included. At ≥ 2-year follow-up 282 patients had LC ≤ 20°. These patients had better SRS-22 scores than those with LC > 20° (P = 0.02). The postoperative LC and LC ≤ 20° were predicted by preoperative LC and LC-bending Cobb angle (P < 0.01, r = 0.4-0.6). Logistic regression models could be established to identify patients at risk for failing the target LC ≤ 20°.For preoperative LC and LC-bending, the prediction model achieved a NPV/PPV of 80%/72%. If the postoperative main thoracic curve is combined with the preoperative LC and a gray area for difficult decisions was allowed, model accuracy could even be improved (NPV/PPV = 96%/81%).
CONCLUSION: An accurate prediction model for postoperative SLCC was established based on a large analysis of prospective STF cases. These models can support prediction and understanding of postoperative SLCC aiding in surgical decision making when contemplating a selective thoracic fusion. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar curve; Prediction; Scoliosis; Selective thoracic fusion; Surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31236658     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06000-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  38 in total

1.  Effect of grafting technique on the maintenance of coronal and sagittal correction in anterior treatment of scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean A Ouellet; Charles E Johnston
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Spontaneous correction and derotation of secondary curves after selective anterior fusion of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Ulf Liljenqvist; Eberhard Hierholzer; Viola Bullmann; Henry F Halm; Sebastian Lauber; Lars Hackenberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Vinson A Smith; Michele Biserni; Lorenzo Gamez; Jean-Pierre C Farcy; Murali Pagala
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws.

Authors:  Matthew B Dobbs; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Ganesh Kamath; Michael W Peelle; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; K H Bridwell; J Harms; D H Clements; T G Lowe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R R Betz; J Harms; D H Clements; L G Lenke; T G Lowe; H L Shufflebarger; D Jeszenszky; B Beele
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Spontaneous lumbar curve correction in selective thoracic fusions of idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches.

Authors:  Prerana N Patel; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Tracey P Bastrom; Michelle C Marks; Jeff B Pawelek; Randal R Betz; Lawrence G Lenke; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with C modifier lumbar curves: 2- to 16-year radiographic and clinical results.

Authors:  Charles C Edwards; Lawrence G Lenke; Michael Peelle; Brenda Sides; Anthony Rinella; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of anterior and posterior double-rod instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: results of 141 patients.

Authors:  Michael Thomas Muschik; Holger Kimmich; Thomas Demmel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Predictability of the spontaneous lumbar curve correction after selective thoracic fusion in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Rob C Jansen; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Eric Duinkerke; André van Ooij
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical predictive model of lumbar curve Cobb angle below selective fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal multicenter descriptive study.

Authors:  Federico Solla; Walid Lakhal; Christian Morin; Jerome Sales de Gauzy; Gaby Kreichati; Ibrahim Obeid; Stéphane Wolff; Joël Lechevallier; Henry F Parent; Jean-Luc Clément; Carlo M Bertoncelli
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-18

2.  Three-dimensional classification of the Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using coronal and lateral spinal radiographs.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Victor Ho-Fung; Malcolm Eker; Sarah Nossov; Michael Francavilla
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Subjective perception of spinal deformity after selective versus non-selective fusion of Lenke 1C curves.

Authors:  Davide Bizzoca; Andrea Piazzolla; Giuseppe Solarino; Lorenzo Moretti; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-02-08

4.  The Importance of Lumbar Curve Flexibility and Apical Vertebral Rotation for the Prediction of Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction in Selective Thoracic Fusion for Lenke Type 1 and 2 C Curves: Retrospective Cohort Study with a Mean Follow-Up of More than 10 years.

Authors:  Ozcan Kaya; Deniz Kara; Halil Gok; Sinan Kahraman; Tunay Sanlı; Selhan Karadereler; Meric Enercan; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04-29

5.  Predicting Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis among Chinese Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Bin Yan; Xinhai Lu; Qihua Qiu; Guohui Nie; Yeen Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.