Literature DB >> 16449905

Spontaneous correction and derotation of secondary curves after selective anterior fusion of idiopathic scoliosis.

Tobias L Schulte1, Ulf Liljenqvist, Eberhard Hierholzer, Viola Bullmann, Henry F Halm, Sebastian Lauber, Lars Hackenberg.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical, rasterstereographic, and radiographic evaluation of spontaneous vertebral derotation of secondary curves in idiopathic scoliosis following selective anterior correction and fusion of the primary curve.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify spontaneous vertebral derotation in secondary curves after selective anterior correction with attention to cosmetic outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While the derotational effect of anterior instrumentation techniques on the instrumented curve is well understood, there is a paucity on data of the rotational behavior of the noninstrumented secondary curves.
METHODS: A total of 43 patients with idiopathic scoliosis (16 with thoracic curves in group 1 and 27 with thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in group 2) underwent selective anterior instrumentation. Vertebral rotation was analyzed before surgery and, on average, 20 months after surgery using digital radiometric rotation analysis, back shape analysis with rasterstereography, and scoliometer measurement.
RESULTS: In Group 1, there was a significant spontaneous vertebral derotation of the secondary lumbar curves by 14.2% (range from 12.7 degrees to 10.9 degrees) in the digital radiometric rotation analysis, surface derotation amounted to 49% (range from 9.6 degrees to 4.9 degrees) in the rasterstereography, and to 70% in the clinical scoliometer measurement (range from 8.0 degrees to 2.4 degrees ). In group 2, there was an increase of rotation of the noninstrumented secondary thoracic curves by 30% (range from 5.0 degrees to 6.5 degrees ) in digital radiometry, by 32.9% in the rasterstereography (range from 8.5 degrees to 11.3 degrees), and a 28.3% increase in scoliometer measurement (range from 6.0 degrees to 7.7 degrees).
CONCLUSION: Selective anterior instrumentation and fusion of primary thoracic curves results in satisfactory spontaneous vertebral and high surface derotation of the secondary lumbar curves. However, in primary thoracolumbar or lumbar curves, an increase of both vertebral and surface rotation of the secondary thoracic curve was noted. This increase can impair cosmetic outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16449905     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000197409.03396.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Selective thoracic fusion in AIS curves: the definition of target outcomes improves the prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC).

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Heidrun Albrecht; Rene Schmidt; Juliane Zenner; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Accurate prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction following posterior selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using logistic regression models and clinical rationale.

Authors:  H Koller; W Hitzl; M C Marks; P O Newton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spontaneous lumbar curve correction in selective anterior instrumentation and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis of Lenke type C.

Authors:  Ulf Liljenqvist; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Selective fusion of idiopathic scoliosis with respect to the Lenke classification].

Authors:  U Liljenqvist; T Lerner; V Bullmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with anterior dual rod instrumentation].

Authors:  U Liljenqvist; H Halm; T Lerner; T Schulte; V Bullmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Selective thoracic fusion of a left decompensated main thoracic curve: proceed with caution?

Authors:  T Barrett Sullivan; Tracey P Bastrom; Carrie E Bartley; Suken A Shah; Baron S Lonner; Jahangir Asghar; Firoz Miyanji; Peter O Newton; Burt Yaszay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Selective fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of current operative strategy.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Yongjung Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The rasterstereographic-dynamic analysis of posture in adolescents using a modified Matthiass test.

Authors:  Marcel Betsch; Michael Wild; Pascal Jungbluth; Simon Thelen; Mohssen Hakimi; Joachim Windolf; Thomas Horstmann; Walter Rapp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Criteria for successful correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in AIS patients: results of risk model calculations using target outcomes and failure analysis.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Axial plane lumbar responses after anterior selective thoracic fusion for main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ki-Ho Na; Jürgen Harms; Kee-Yong Ha; Nam-Yong Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.