Alessandro Abbouda1, Filippo Avogaro2, Mariya Moosajee3,4,5,6, Enzo Maria Vingolo1,2. 1. Fiorini Hospital Terracina AUSL, 04019 Terracina, Latina, Italy. 2. Department of Sense Organs, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, Sapienza University of Rome, p.le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy. 3. UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 9EL, UK. 4. Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London EC1V 2PD, UK. 5. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK. 6. The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Choroideremia (CHM) is an X-linked recessive chorioretinal dystrophy caused by mutations involving the CHM gene. Gene therapy has entered late-phase clinical trials, although there have been variable results. This review gives a summary on the outcomes of phase I/II CHM gene therapy trials and describes other potential experimental therapies. Materials and Methods: A Medline (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) search was performed to identify all articles describing gene therapy treatments available for CHM. Results: Five phase I/II clinical trials that reported subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus Rab escort protein 1 (AAV2.REP1) vector in CHM patients were included. The Oxford study (NCT01461213) included 14 patients; a median gain of 5.5 ± 6.8 SD (-6 min, 18 max) early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letters was reported. The Tubingen study (NCT02671539) included six patients; only one patient had an improvement of 17 ETDRS letters. The Alberta study (NCT02077361) enrolled six patients, and it reported a minimal vision change, except for one patient who gained 15 ETDRS letters. Six patients were enrolled in the Miami trial (NCT02553135), which reported a median gain of 2 ± 4 SD (-1 min, 10 max) ETDRS letters. The Philadelphia study (NCT02341807) included 10 patients; best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) returned to baseline in all by one-year follow-up, but one patient had -17 ETDRS letters from baseline. Overall, 40 patients were enrolled in trials, and 34 had 2 years of follow-up, with a median gain of 1.5 ± 7.2 SD (-14 min, 18 max) in ETDRS letters. Conclusions: The primary endpoint, BCVA following gene therapy in CHM, showed a marginal improvement with variability between trials. Optimizing surgical technique and pre-, peri-, and post-operative management with immunosuppressants to minimize any adverse ocular inflammatory events could lead to reduced incidence of complications. The ideal therapeutic window needs to be addressed to ensure that the necessary cell types are adequately transduced, minimizing viral toxicity, to prolong long-term transgenic potential. Long-term efficacy will be addressed by ongoing studies.
Background and objectives: Choroideremia (CHM) is an X-linked recessive chorioretinal dystrophy caused by mutations involving the CHM gene. Gene therapy has entered late-phase clinical trials, although there have been variable results. This review gives a summary on the outcomes of phase I/IICHM gene therapy trials and describes other potential experimental therapies. Materials and Methods: A Medline (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) search was performed to identify all articles describing gene therapy treatments available for CHM. Results: Five phase I/II clinical trials that reported subretinal injection of adeno-associated virusRab escort protein 1 (AAV2.REP1) vector in CHMpatients were included. The Oxford study (NCT01461213) included 14 patients; a median gain of 5.5 ± 6.8 SD (-6 min, 18 max) early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letters was reported. The Tubingen study (NCT02671539) included six patients; only one patient had an improvement of 17 ETDRS letters. The Alberta study (NCT02077361) enrolled six patients, and it reported a minimal vision change, except for one patient who gained 15 ETDRS letters. Six patients were enrolled in the Miami trial (NCT02553135), which reported a median gain of 2 ± 4 SD (-1 min, 10 max) ETDRS letters. The Philadelphia study (NCT02341807) included 10 patients; best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) returned to baseline in all by one-year follow-up, but one patient had -17 ETDRS letters from baseline. Overall, 40 patients were enrolled in trials, and 34 had 2 years of follow-up, with a median gain of 1.5 ± 7.2 SD (-14 min, 18 max) in ETDRS letters. Conclusions: The primary endpoint, BCVA following gene therapy in CHM, showed a marginal improvement with variability between trials. Optimizing surgical technique and pre-, peri-, and post-operative management with immunosuppressants to minimize any adverse ocular inflammatory events could lead to reduced incidence of complications. The ideal therapeutic window needs to be addressed to ensure that the necessary cell types are adequately transduced, minimizing viral toxicity, to prolong long-term transgenic potential. Long-term efficacy will be addressed by ongoing studies.
Authors: Stephen Russell; Jean Bennett; Jennifer A Wellman; Daniel C Chung; Zi-Fan Yu; Amy Tillman; Janet Wittes; Julie Pappas; Okan Elci; Sarah McCague; Dominique Cross; Kathleen A Marshall; Jean Walshire; Taylor L Kehoe; Hannah Reichert; Maria Davis; Leslie Raffini; Lindsey A George; F Parker Hudson; Laura Dingfield; Xiaosong Zhu; Julia A Haller; Elliott H Sohn; Vinit B Mahajan; Wanda Pfeifer; Michelle Weckmann; Chris Johnson; Dina Gewaily; Arlene Drack; Edwin Stone; Katie Wachtel; Francesca Simonelli; Bart P Leroy; J Fraser Wright; Katherine A High; Albert M Maguire Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mariya Moosajee; Simon C Ramsden; Graeme C M Black; Miguel C Seabra; Andrew R Webster Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Tanya Tolmachova; Oleg E Tolmachov; Silene T Wavre-Shapton; Dhani Tracey-White; Clare E Futter; Miguel C Seabra Journal: J Gene Med Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.565
Authors: Albert M Maguire; Francesca Simonelli; Eric A Pierce; Edward N Pugh; Federico Mingozzi; Jeannette Bennicelli; Sandro Banfi; Kathleen A Marshall; Francesco Testa; Enrico M Surace; Settimio Rossi; Arkady Lyubarsky; Valder R Arruda; Barbara Konkle; Edwin Stone; Junwei Sun; Jonathan Jacobs; Lou Dell'Osso; Richard Hertle; Jian-xing Ma; T Michael Redmond; Xiaosong Zhu; Bernd Hauck; Olga Zelenaia; Kenneth S Shindler; Maureen G Maguire; J Fraser Wright; Nicholas J Volpe; Jennifer Wellman McDonnell; Alberto Auricchio; Katherine A High; Jean Bennett Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-04-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Byron L Lam; Janet L Davis; Ninel Z Gregori; Robert E MacLaren; Aniz Girach; Jennifer D Verriotto; Belen Rodriguez; Potyra R Rosa; Xiaojun Zhang; William J Feuer Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jiang-Hui Wang; Grace E Lidgerwood; Maciej Daniszewski; Monica L Hu; Georgina E Roberts; Raymond C B Wong; Sandy S C Hung; Michelle E McClements; Alex W Hewitt; Alice Pébay; Doron G Hickey; Thomas L Edwards Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.996