Liangbo L Shen1, Aneesha Ahluwalia1, Mengyuan Sun2, Benjamin K Young1, Holly K Grossetta Nardini3, Lucian V Del Priore4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: lucian.delpriore@yale.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the natural history of atrophy secondary to choroideremia (CHM). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A sensitive and reliable anatomic measure to monitor disease progression is needed in treatment trials for CHM. However, the long-term natural history of the residual retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is unclear, with reported RPE area decline rates varying widely among patients. METHODS: We searched in 7 literature databases up through July 17, 2019, to identify studies that assessed the residual RPE area in untreated eyes with CHM using fundus autofluorescence (FAF). We sought individual-eye data and investigated the RPE decline pattern using 3 models: the area linear model (ALM), radius linear model (RLM), and area exponential model (AEM), in which the area, radius, and log-transformed area of RPE change linearly with time, respectively. To account for different eyes' entry times into the studies, we added a horizontal translation factor to each dataset. The RPE decline rate was estimated using a 2-stage random-effects meta-analysis. We assessed the risk of bias using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: Of 807 articles screened, we included 9 articles containing cross-sectional data (257 eyes) from 6 studies and longitudinal data (229 visits from 68 eyes) from 5 studies. The residual RPE area followed a trend of exponential decay as a function of patient age. After the introduction of horizontal translation factors to longitudinal datasets of individual eyes, the datasets fit along a straight line in the AEM over nearly 60 years (r2 = 0.997). The decline rate of log-transformed RPE area was 0.050 (95% confidence interval, 0.046-0.055) log(mm2)/year and was independent of the baseline RPE area (r = -0.18; P = 0.15) and age (r = 0.06; P = 0.63). In contrast, the decline rates of the area and effective radius of residual RPE strongly correlated with the baseline RPE area (r = 0.90 and 0.61, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The loss of residual RPE area in untreated eyes with CHM follows the AEM over approximately 60 years. Log-transformed residual RPE area measured by FAF can serve as an anatomic endpoint to monitor CHM.
PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the natural history of atrophy secondary to choroideremia (CHM). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A sensitive and reliable anatomic measure to monitor disease progression is needed in treatment trials for CHM. However, the long-term natural history of the residual retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is unclear, with reported RPE area decline rates varying widely among patients. METHODS: We searched in 7 literature databases up through July 17, 2019, to identify studies that assessed the residual RPE area in untreated eyes with CHM using fundus autofluorescence (FAF). We sought individual-eye data and investigated the RPE decline pattern using 3 models: the area linear model (ALM), radius linear model (RLM), and area exponential model (AEM), in which the area, radius, and log-transformed area of RPE change linearly with time, respectively. To account for different eyes' entry times into the studies, we added a horizontal translation factor to each dataset. The RPE decline rate was estimated using a 2-stage random-effects meta-analysis. We assessed the risk of bias using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: Of 807 articles screened, we included 9 articles containing cross-sectional data (257 eyes) from 6 studies and longitudinal data (229 visits from 68 eyes) from 5 studies. The residual RPE area followed a trend of exponential decay as a function of patient age. After the introduction of horizontal translation factors to longitudinal datasets of individual eyes, the datasets fit along a straight line in the AEM over nearly 60 years (r2 = 0.997). The decline rate of log-transformed RPE area was 0.050 (95% confidence interval, 0.046-0.055) log(mm2)/year and was independent of the baseline RPE area (r = -0.18; P = 0.15) and age (r = 0.06; P = 0.63). In contrast, the decline rates of the area and effective radius of residual RPE strongly correlated with the baseline RPE area (r = 0.90 and 0.61, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The loss of residual RPE area in untreated eyes with CHM follows the AEM over approximately 60 years. Log-transformed residual RPE area measured by FAF can serve as an anatomic endpoint to monitor CHM.
Authors: Ioannis S Dimopoulos; Stephanie C Hoang; Alina Radziwon; Natalia M Binczyk; Miguel C Seabra; Robert E MacLaren; Rizwan Somani; Matthew T S Tennant; Ian M MacDonald Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Tomas S Aleman; Grace Han; Leona W Serrano; Nicole M Fuerst; Emily S Charlson; Denise J Pearson; Daniel C Chung; Anastasia Traband; Wei Pan; Gui-Shuang Ying; Jean Bennett; Albert M Maguire; Jessica I W Morgan Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: SriniVas R Sadda; Usha Chakravarthy; David G Birch; Giovanni Staurenghi; Erin C Henry; Christopher Brittain Journal: Retina Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Jill A Hayden; Danielle A van der Windt; Jennifer L Cartwright; Pierre Côté; Claire Bombardier Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jasleen K Jolly; Thomas L Edwards; Jonathan Moules; Markus Groppe; Susan M Downes; Robert E MacLaren Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jasleen K Jolly; Kanmin Xue; Thomas L Edwards; Markus Groppe; Robert E MacLaren Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Liangbo L Shen; Aneesha Ahluwalia; Mengyuan Sun; Benjamin K Young; Holly K Grossetta Nardini; Lucian V Del Priore Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 5.908
Authors: Adam M Dubis; Wei S Lim; Jasleen K Jolly; Maria Toms; Robert E MacLaren; Andrew R Webster; Mariya Moosajee Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Liangbo L Shen; Mengyuan Sun; Aneesha Ahluwalia; Michael M Park; Benjamin K Young; Eleonora M Lad; Cynthia Toth; Lucian V Del Priore Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 5.908