Literature DB >> 31231903

Non-Invasive Ultrasound Quantification of Scar Tissue Volume Identifies Early Functional Changes During Tendon Healing.

Jessica E Ackerman1, Valentina Studentsova1, Marlin Myers1, Mark R Buckley1,2, Michael S Richards3, Alayna E Loiselle1.   

Abstract

Tendon injuries are very common and disrupt the transmission of forces from muscle to bone, leading to impaired function and quality of life. Successful restoration of tendon function after injury is a challenging clinical problem due to the pathological, scar-mediated manner in which the tendons heal. Currently, there are no standard treatments to modulate scar tissue formation and improve tendon healing. A major limitation to the identification of therapeutic candidates has been the reliance on terminal endpoint metrics of healing in pre-clinical studies, which require a large number of animals and result in destruction of the tissue. To address this limitation, we have identified quantification of scar tissue volume (STV) from ultrasound (US) imaging as a longitudinal, non-invasive metric of tendon healing. STV was strongly correlated with established endpoint metrics of gliding function including gliding resistance and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) flexion angle. However, no associations were observed between STV and structural or material properties. To define the sensitivity of STV to identify differences between functionally discrete tendon healing phenotypes, we utilized S100a4 haploinsufficient mice (S100a4GFP/+ ), which heal with improved gliding function relative to wild-type (WT) littermates. A significant decrease in STV was observed in S100a4GFP/+ repairs, relative to WT at day 14. Taken together, these data suggest US quantification of STV as a means to facilitate the rapid screening of biological and pharmacological interventions to improve tendon healing, and identify promising therapeutic targets, in an efficient, cost-effective manner.
© 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2476-2485, 2019. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mouse model; range of motion; scar tissue; tendon healing; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31231903      PMCID: PMC6816309          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  26 in total

1.  Replacement, reduction and refinement.

Authors:  Paul Flecknell
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.043

2.  Ultrasound strain mapping of Achilles tendon compressive strain patterns during dorsiflexion.

Authors:  Ruth L Chimenti; A Samuel Flemister; John Ketz; Mary Bucklin; Mark R Buckley; Michael S Richards
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  [Single-stage flexor tendoplasty in the treatment of flexor tendon injuries].

Authors:  Atakan Aydin; Murat Topalan; Ali Mezdeği; Ilker Sezer; Türker Ozkan; Metin Erer; Safiye Ozkan
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Is echogenicity a viable metric for evaluating tendon properties in vivo?

Authors:  Stephen M Suydam; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Adhesions in a murine flexor tendon graft model: autograft versus allograft reconstruction.

Authors:  Sys Hasslund; Justin A Jacobson; Tulin Dadali; Patrick Basile; Michael Ulrich-Vinther; Kjeld Søballe; Edward M Schwarz; Regis J O'Keefe; David J Mitten; Hani A Awad
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  The use of sonoelastography to assess the recovery of stiffness after equine superficial digital flexor tendon injuries: A preliminary prospective longitudinal study of the healing process.

Authors:  N Tamura; T Nukada; T Kato; T Kuroda; Y Kotoyori; K Fukuda; Y Kasashima
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  The incidence of acute traumatic tendon injuries in the hand and wrist: a 10-year population-based study.

Authors:  Johanna P de Jong; Jesse T Nguyen; Anne J M Sonnema; Emily C Nguyen; Peter C Amadio; Steven L Moran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-05-16

8.  Characteristics of Sonography in a Rat Achilles Tendinopathy Model: Possible Non-invasive Predictors of Biomechanics.

Authors:  Su-Ya Lee; Hsiao-Feng Chieh; Chien-Ju Lin; I-Ming Jou; Yung-Nien Sun; Li-Chieh Kuo; Po-Ting Wu; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cell non-autonomous functions of S100a4 drive fibrotic tendon healing.

Authors:  Jessica E Ackerman; Anne Ec Nichols; Valentina Studentsova; Katherine T Best; Emma Knapp; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Evaluation of tissue displacement and regional strain in the Achilles tendon using quantitative high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  Stijn Bogaerts; Catarina De Brito Carvalho; Lennart Scheys; Kaat Desloovere; Jan D'hooge; Frederik Maes; Paul Suetens; Koen Peers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Achilles Tendon Ruptures in Middle-Aged Rats Heal Poorly Compared With Those in Young and Old Rats [Formula: see text].

Authors:  Thomas P Leahy; Courtney A Nuss; Mary Kate Evans; Ashley K Fung; Snehal S Shetye; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Photoacoustic monitoring of angiogenesis predicts response to therapy in healing wounds.

Authors:  Yash Mantri; Jason Tsujimoto; Brian Donovan; Christopher C Fernandes; Pranav S Garimella; William F Penny; Caesar A Anderson; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 3.  Research progress of scar repair and its influence on physical and mental health.

Authors:  Wenke Shen; Liang Chen; Fubo Tian
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-12-15

4.  Tgfβ signaling is required for tenocyte recruitment and functional neonatal tendon regeneration.

Authors:  Deepak A Kaji; Kristen L Howell; Zerina Balic; Dirk Hubmacher; Alice H Huang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Suture Materials for Repair of Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Study.

Authors:  Jaeho Cho; Hyun-Joo Kim; Jeong Seok Lee; Jahyung Kim; Sung Hun Won; Young Yi; Dong-Il Chun
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-13

Review 6.  Comparison of Tendon Development Versus Tendon Healing and Regeneration.

Authors:  Peiwen He; Dengfeng Ruan; Zizhan Huang; Canlong Wang; Yiwen Xu; Honglu Cai; Hengzhi Liu; Yang Fei; Boon Chin Heng; Weishan Chen; Weiliang Shen
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-01-24

7.  Effects of tamoxifen on tendon homeostasis and healing: Considerations for the use of tamoxifen-inducible mouse models.

Authors:  Katherine T Best; Valentina Studentsova; Jessica E Ackerman; Anne E C Nichols; Marlin Myers; Justin Cobb; Emma Knapp; Hani A Awad; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.102

8.  The S100A4 Transcriptional Inhibitor Niclosamide Reduces Pro-Inflammatory and Migratory Phenotypes of Microglia: Implications for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Alessia Serrano; Savina Apolloni; Simona Rossi; Serena Lattante; Mario Sabatelli; Mina Peric; Pavle Andjus; Fabrizio Michetti; Maria Teresa Carrì; Mauro Cozzolino; Nadia D'Ambrosi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.