Literature DB >> 31227999

Update on HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis: Effectiveness, Drug Resistance, and Risk Compensation.

Victoria E Powell1, Kevin M Gibas1, Joshua DuBow1, Douglas S Krakower2,3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In 2019, the US government launched an initiative to decrease new HIV infections by 90% over the next decade. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for high-risk populations, and the United States Preventative Services Task Force has issued a grade A recommendation for PrEP, indicating substantial net benefit. However, questions have been raised about the effectiveness of PrEP in clinical settings and whether PrEP use might promote antiretroviral drug resistance and increased sexual risk behaviors, which could increase transmission of bacterial sexually transmitted infections. In this narrative review, we summarize recent evidence of the effectiveness of PrEP when provided in clinical and community settings, the emergence of antiretroviral drug resistance during PrEP use, and associations between PrEP use and increased sexual risk behaviors. We also review novel PrEP modalities that are being developed to optimize PrEP acceptability, adherence, and effectiveness. RECENT
FINDINGS: Studies suggest that PrEP is effective when provided in clinical settings. However, PrEP uptake and impact have been limited in the USA thus far, and major disparities in access to PrEP exist. In addition, there is evidence that drug resistance can occur with PrEP use, particularly with inadvertent PrEP use during undiagnosed acute HIV infection. Risk compensation can also occur with PrEP use and has been associated with increased sexually transmitted infections. Promising new modalities for PrEP could expand options. PrEP has strong potential to decrease HIV incidence. However, disparities in access must be addressed to ensure equity and impact for PrEP. While drug resistance and risk compensation can occur with PrEP use, these are not valid reasons to withhold PrEP from patients given its substantial protective benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical effectiveness; Drug resistance; HIV; Preexposure prophylaxis; Risk compensation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31227999     DOI: 10.1007/s11908-019-0685-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep        ISSN: 1523-3847            Impact factor:   3.725


  75 in total

1.  Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Robert M Grant; Javier R Lama; Peter L Anderson; Vanessa McMahan; Albert Y Liu; Lorena Vargas; Pedro Goicochea; Martín Casapía; Juan Vicente Guanira-Carranza; Maria E Ramirez-Cardich; Orlando Montoya-Herrera; Telmo Fernández; Valdilea G Veloso; Susan P Buchbinder; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Mauro Schechter; Linda-Gail Bekker; Kenneth H Mayer; Esper Georges Kallás; K Rivet Amico; Kathleen Mulligan; Lane R Bushman; Robert J Hance; Carmela Ganoza; Patricia Defechereux; Brian Postle; Furong Wang; J Jeff McConnell; Jia-Hua Zheng; Jeanny Lee; James F Rooney; Howard S Jaffe; Ana I Martinez; David N Burns; David V Glidden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Risk compensation: the Achilles' heel of innovations in HIV prevention?

Authors:  Michael M Cassell; Daniel T Halperin; James D Shelton; David Stanton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-11

3.  Penetration of tenofovir and emtricitabine in mucosal tissues: implications for prevention of HIV-1 transmission.

Authors:  Kristine B Patterson; Heather A Prince; Eric Kraft; Amanda J Jenkins; Nicholas J Shaheen; James F Rooney; Myron S Cohen; Angela D M Kashuba
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana.

Authors:  Michael C Thigpen; Poloko M Kebaabetswe; Lynn A Paxton; Dawn K Smith; Charles E Rose; Tebogo M Segolodi; Faith L Henderson; Sonal R Pathak; Fatma A Soud; Kata L Chillag; Rodreck Mutanhaurwa; Lovemore Ian Chirwa; Michael Kasonde; Daniel Abebe; Evans Buliva; Roman J Gvetadze; Sandra Johnson; Thom Sukalac; Vasavi T Thomas; Clyde Hart; Jeffrey A Johnson; C Kevin Malotte; Craig W Hendrix; John T Brooks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women.

Authors:  Jared M Baeten; Deborah Donnell; Patrick Ndase; Nelly R Mugo; James D Campbell; Jonathan Wangisi; Jordan W Tappero; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Elly Katabira; Allan Ronald; Elioda Tumwesigye; Edwin Were; Kenneth H Fife; James Kiarie; Carey Farquhar; Grace John-Stewart; Aloysious Kakia; Josephine Odoyo; Akasiima Mucunguzi; Edith Nakku-Joloba; Rogers Twesigye; Kenneth Ngure; Cosmas Apaka; Harrison Tamooh; Fridah Gabona; Andrew Mujugira; Dana Panteleeff; Katherine K Thomas; Lara Kidoguchi; Meighan Krows; Jennifer Revall; Susan Morrison; Harald Haugen; Mira Emmanuel-Ogier; Lisa Ondrejcek; Robert W Coombs; Lisa Frenkel; Craig Hendrix; Namandjé N Bumpus; David Bangsberg; Jessica E Haberer; Wendy S Stevens; Jairam R Lingappa; Connie Celum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Use of postexposure prophylaxis against HIV infection following sexual exposure does not lead to increases in high-risk behavior.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Martin; Michelle E Roland; Torsten B Neilands; Melissa R Krone; Joshua D Bamberger; Robert P Kohn; Margaret A Chesney; Karena Franses; James O Kahn; Thomas J Coates; Mitchell H Katz
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  Highly active antiretroviral therapy and sexual risk behavior: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Nicole Crepaz; Trevor A Hart; Gary Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Single dose pharmacokinetics of oral tenofovir in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, colonic tissue, and vaginal tissue.

Authors:  Nicolette A Louissaint; Ying-Jun Cao; Paul L Skipper; Rosa G Liberman; Steven R Tannenbaum; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Jean R Anderson; Stephanie Everts; Rahul Bakshi; Edward J Fuchs; Craig W Hendrix
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.205

9.  Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Kachit Choopanya; Michael Martin; Pravan Suntharasamai; Udomsak Sangkum; Philip A Mock; Manoj Leethochawalit; Sithisat Chiamwongpaet; Praphan Kitisin; Pitinan Natrujirote; Somyot Kittimunkong; Rutt Chuachoowong; Roman J Gvetadze; Janet M McNicholl; Lynn A Paxton; Marcel E Curlin; Craig W Hendrix; Suphak Vanichseni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  From efficacy to effectiveness: facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City.

Authors:  Sarit A Golub; Kristi E Gamarel; H Jonathon Rendina; Anthony Surace; Corina L Lelutiu-Weinberger
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.078

View more
  9 in total

1.  HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Awareness and Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Only and Men Who Have Sex with Both Men and Women.

Authors:  Jun Tao; Madeline C Montgomery; Christina T Chu; Collette Sosnowy; Alexi Almonte; William C Goedel; Elizabeth S Silva; Antonio Reisopoulos; Sarah Alexandra Marshall; Nickolas D Zaller; Brooke G Rogers; Amy S Nunn; Brandon D L Marshall; Philip A Chan
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.078

2.  Healthcare provider knowledge and attitudes about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in pregnancy in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Dvora L Joseph Davey; Joseph Daniels; Cindy Beard; Nyiko Mashele; Linda-Gail Bekker; Kathryn Dovel; Jabulani Ncayiyana; Thomas J Coates; Landon Myer
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2020-06-23

3.  Sexual Health of Rural and Urban Young Male Couples in the United States: Differences in HIV Testing, Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use, and Condom Use.

Authors:  Elissa L Sarno; Emily Bettin; Kyle Jozsa; Michael E Newcomb
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2021-01

4.  HIV-1 Nucleic Acids Identify Rectal HIV Exposures in Self-Collected Rectal Swabs, Whereas Y-Chromosome Single Tandem Repeat Mixtures Are Not Reliable Biomarkers of Condomless Receptive Anal Intercourse.

Authors:  Maria P Lemos; Vijay Nandi; Joan Dragavon; Ira Fleming; Keertana Krishnan; Martin Musuruana; Madeline Kramer; Hayley Glantz; Michele Andrasik; Robert W Coombs; M Juliana McElrath; Hong-Van Tieu
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.771

5.  Loss to Follow-Up and Re-Engagement in HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care in the United States, 2013-2019.

Authors:  Jun Tao; Madeline C Montgomery; Robert Williams; Prasad Patil; Brooke G Rogers; Collette Sosnowy; Matthew Murphy; Alexandra Zanowick-Marr; Michaela Maynard; Siena C Napoleon; Christina Chu; Alexi Almonte; Amy S Nunn; Philip A Chan
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 5.944

6.  Interest in Taking HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Is Associated with Behavioral Risk Indicators and Self-Perceived HIV Risk Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Attending HIV Testing Venues in Sweden.

Authors:  Tobias Herder; Anette Agardh; Per Björkman; Fredrik Månsson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-06-03

Review 7.  HIV Drug Resistance in Children and Adolescents: Always a Challenge?

Authors:  Wei Li A Koay; Judith Kose-Otieno; Natella Rakhmanina
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 8.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: effective and underused.

Authors:  Amanda Hempel; Mia J Biondi; Jean-Guy Baril; Darrell H S Tan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 16.859

9.  Transmitted drug resistance to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine among persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection in Shenyang city, Northeast China from 2016 to 2018.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Bin Zhao; Minghui An; Wei Song; Xue Dong; Xin Li; Lu Wang; Lin Wang; Wen Tian; Haibo Ding; Xiaoxu Han
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.090

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.