Literature DB >> 34242092

Loss to Follow-Up and Re-Engagement in HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care in the United States, 2013-2019.

Jun Tao1, Madeline C Montgomery2, Robert Williams1, Prasad Patil3, Brooke G Rogers1, Collette Sosnowy1, Matthew Murphy1, Alexandra Zanowick-Marr1, Michaela Maynard1, Siena C Napoleon1, Christina Chu1, Alexi Almonte1, Amy S Nunn2, Philip A Chan1,2.   

Abstract

Retention in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care is critical for effective PrEP implementation. Few studies have reported long-term lost to follow-up (LTFU) and re-engagement in PrEP care in the United States. Medical record data for all cisgender patients presenting to the major Rhode Island PrEP clinic from 2013 to 2019 were included. LTFU was defined as no PrEP follow-up appointment within 98 days. Re-engagement in care was defined as individuals who were ever LTFU and later attended a follow-up appointment. Recurrent event survival analysis was performed to explore factors associated with PrEP retention over time. Of 654 PrEP patients, the median age was 31 years old [interquartile range (IQR): 25, 43]. The majority were male (96%), White (64%), non-Hispanic (82%), and insured (97%). Overall, 72% patients were ever LTFU and 27% of those ever LTFU re-engaged in care. Female patients were 1.37 times [crude hazard ratio (cHR): 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-2.18] more likely to be LTFU than male patients, and a 1-year increase in age was associated with a 1% lower hazard of being LTFU (cHR: 0.99; CI: 0.98-0.99). Being either heterosexual (aHR: 2.25, 95% (CI): 1.70-2.99] or bisexual (aHR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.15-4.82) was associated with a higher hazard of loss to follow-up compared with having same-sex partners only. The majority of PrEP users were LTFU, especially at the first 6 months of PrEP initiation. Although a significant number were re-engaged in care, targeted interventions are needed to improve retention in PrEP care. This study characterized the natural projection of loss to follow-up and re-engagement in HIV PrEP care using a longitudinal clinic cohort data and explored associated factors for guiding future interventions to improve retention in PrEP care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  care retention; human immunodeficiency virus; pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34242092      PMCID: PMC8262386          DOI: 10.1089/apc.2021.0074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS        ISSN: 1087-2914            Impact factor:   5.944


  36 in total

1.  Impact of the Centers for Disease Control's HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Guidelines for Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.

Authors:  Samuel M Jenness; Steven M Goodreau; Eli Rosenberg; Emily N Beylerian; Karen W Hoover; Dawn K Smith; Patrick Sullivan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  The prevalence of pre-exposure prophylaxis use and the pre-exposure prophylaxis-to-need ratio in the fourth quarter of 2017, United States.

Authors:  Aaron J Siegler; Farah Mouhanna; Robertino Mera Giler; Kevin Weiss; Elizabeth Pembleton; Jodie Guest; Jeb Jones; Amanda Castel; Howa Yeung; Michael Kramer; Scott McCallister; Patrick S Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Correlates of Awareness of and Willingness to Use Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Use Geosocial-Networking Smartphone Applications in New York City.

Authors:  William C Goedel; Perry N Halkitis; Richard E Greene; Dustin T Duncan
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-07

4.  Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana.

Authors:  Michael C Thigpen; Poloko M Kebaabetswe; Lynn A Paxton; Dawn K Smith; Charles E Rose; Tebogo M Segolodi; Faith L Henderson; Sonal R Pathak; Fatma A Soud; Kata L Chillag; Rodreck Mutanhaurwa; Lovemore Ian Chirwa; Michael Kasonde; Daniel Abebe; Evans Buliva; Roman J Gvetadze; Sandra Johnson; Thom Sukalac; Vasavi T Thomas; Clyde Hart; Jeffrey A Johnson; C Kevin Malotte; Craig W Hendrix; John T Brooks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Unlocking HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Delivery: Examining the Role of HIV Providers in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care.

Authors:  Tiffany Cho Kenison; Brittan Badenhop; Stella Safo
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.078

6.  Brief Report: Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Awareness and Use Among Cisgender Women at a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic.

Authors:  Julia R Raifman; Sheree R Schwartz; Collette D Sosnowy; Madeline C Montgomery; Alexi Almonte; Angela R Bazzi; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Michael D Stein; Tiara C Willie; Amy S Nunn; Philip A Chan
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.771

7.  PrEP awareness and decision-making for Latino MSM in San Antonio, Texas.

Authors:  Moctezuma García; Allyssa L Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Improving PrEP Implementation Through Multilevel Interventions: A Synthesis of the Literature.

Authors:  Rogério M Pinto; Kathryn R Berringer; Rita Melendez; Okeoma Mmeje
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-11

9.  Early experiences implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention in San Francisco.

Authors:  Albert Liu; Stephanie Cohen; Stephen Follansbee; Deborah Cohan; Shannon Weber; Darpun Sachdev; Susan Buchbinder
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  National trends in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness, willingness and use among United States men who have sex with men recruited online, 2013 through 2017.

Authors:  Patrick S Sullivan; Travis H Sanchez; Maria Zlotorzynska; Cristian J Chandler; R C Sineath; Erin Kahle; Stephen Tregear
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.396

View more
  5 in total

1.  Are Unequal Policies in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake Needed to Improve Equality? An Examination Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Anthony Nguyen; Emmanuel Fulgence Drabo; Wendy H Garland; Corrina Moucheraud; Ian W Holloway; Arleen Leibowitz; Sze-Chuan Suen
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 5.944

2.  Long-Acting Injectable Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Preferred Over Other Modalities Among People Who Inject Drugs: Findings from a Qualitative Study in California.

Authors:  Angela R Bazzi; Chad J Valasek; Samantha A Streuli; Carlos F Vera; Alicia Harvey-Vera; Morgan M Philbin; Katie B Biello; Alexis M Roth; Steffanie A Strathdee; Heather A Pines
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.944

Review 3.  Running with Scissors: a Systematic Review of Substance Use and the Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Care Continuum Among Sexual Minority Men.

Authors:  Michael Viamonte; Delaram Ghanooni; John M Reynolds; Christian Grov; Adam W Carrico
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.495

4.  Lost2PrEP: Understanding Reasons for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Sexual Health Care Disengagement Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Attending a Sexual Health Clinic at a Large Urban Academic Medical Center in New York City.

Authors:  Kelly Rowe; Deborah A Theodore; Jason Zucker; Omid Cohensedgh; Elijah LaSota; Caroline Carnevale; Alwyn Cohall; Susan Olender; Peter Gordon; Magdalena E Sobieszczyk
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 5.944

5.  Why Do HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Users Discontinue Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care? A Mixed Methods Survey in a Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Clinic in Belgium.

Authors:  Thibaut Vanbaelen; Anke Rotsaert; Bart K M Jacobs; Eric Florence; Chris Kenyon; Bea Vuylsteke; Marie Laga; Reyniers Thijs
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 5.944

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.