| Literature DB >> 31227893 |
Raffaele Nardone1,2,3, Stefan Golaszewski4,5, Kerstin Schwenker4,5, Francesco Brigo6,7, Miriam Maccarrone6, Viviana Versace8,9, Luca Sebastianelli8,9, Leopold Saltuari8,9,10, Yvonne Höller11.
Abstract
The pathophysiological mechanisms of cognitive and gait disturbances in subjects with normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) are still unclear. Cholinergic and other neurotransmitter abnormalities have been reported in animal models of NPH. The objective of this study was to evaluate the short latency afferent inhibition (SAI), a transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol which gives the possibility to test an inhibitory cholinergic circuit in the human brain, in subjects with idiopathic NPH (iNPH). We applied SAI technique in twenty iNPH patients before ventricular shunt surgery. Besides SAI, also the resting motor threshold and the short intracortical inhibition to paired stimulation were assessed. A significant reduction of the SAI (p = 0.016), associated with a less pronounced decrease of the resting motor threshold and the short latency intracortical inhibition to paired stimulation, were observed in patients with iNPH at baseline evaluation. We also found significant (p < 0.001) correlations between SAI values and the gait function tests, as well as between SAI and the neuropsychological tests. These findings suggest that the impairment of cholinergic neurons markedly contributes to cognitive decline and gait impairment in subjects with iNPH.Entities:
Keywords: Cholinergic transmission; Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus; Short latency afferent inhibition; Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31227893 PMCID: PMC6647526 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-019-02036-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) ISSN: 0300-9564 Impact factor: 3.575
Demographic characteristics, clinical and neurophysiological data of the patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the control subjects
| Patients | Controls | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 73.6 ± 8.06 | 74.8 ± 8.03 |
| TUG (s) | 18.85 ± 4.81 | 14.6 ± 2.52 |
| 6MWT | 240.55 ± 31.68 | 610 ± 37.73 |
| MMSE | 25.7 ± 3.55 | 29.55 ± 0.6 |
| RAVLT | 27.65 ± 9.41 | 60.04 ± 6.31 |
| Digit span | 7.7 ± 1.92 | 4.1 ± 0.91 |
| TMT-A | 268.7 ± 39.77 | 125.45 ± 27.48 |
| TMT-B | 111.7 ± 38.26 | 49.5 ± 8.38 |
| RMTa | 49 ± 11.7 | 51.5 ± 11.8 |
| SICIb | 37.45 ± 10,01 | 34.7 ± 11.13 |
| SAIb | 64.75 ± 18.1 | 43.15 ± 9.65 |
Data are expressed as mean values ± SD
Y years, s seconds, TUG timed up and go test, 6MWT total walking distance for the 6-min walk test, MMSE mini-mental scale examination, RAVLT rey auditory verbal learning test, TMT trail making test, RMT the resting motor threshold, SICI the short latency intracortical inhibition, SAI short latency afferent inhibition
a% of maximum stimulator output
b% of test response
Fig. 1The distributions of RMT, SICI, and SAI are shown for the two groups are shown. As the boxplots reveal, the distributions overlap largely for RMT and SICI, resulting in no significant difference, while there is minimal overlap for SAI, resulting in a significant difference between groups. MSO maximum stimulator output
Relative effects for factor group
| Controls | Patients | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.52 | 0.48 |
| SAI | 0.19 | 0.81 |
| RMT | 0.58 | 0.42 |
| SICI | 0.46 | 0.54 |
| TUG | 0.24 | 0.76 |
| 6MWT | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| MMSE | 0.94 | 0.06 |
| RAVLT | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| DigitSpan | 0.06 | 0.94 |
| TMT A | 0.01 | 0.99 |
| TMT B | 0.00 | 1.00 |
SAI short latency afferent inhibition, RMT the resting motor threshold, SICI the short latency intracortical inhibition, TUG timed up and go test, 6MWT total walking distance for the 6‐min walk test, MMSE mini-mental scale examination, RAVLT rey auditory verbal learning test, TMT trail making test
Correlations separately for the two groups
| Controls | Patients | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rho | Rho | |||
| TUG | 0.11 | 0.64 | 0.92 | < 0.001 |
| 6MWT | − 0.27 | 0.24 | − 0.76 | < 0.001 |
| MMSE | 0.12 | 0.61 | − 0.95 | < 0.001 |
| RAVLT | 0.19 | 0.43 | − 0.92 | < 0.001 |
| DigitSpan | 0.12 | 0.62 | − 0.79 | < 0.001 |
| TMT A | − 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.94 | < 0.001 |
| TMTB | 0.02 | 0.93 | 0.93 | < 0.001 |
TUG timed up and go test, 6MWT total walking distance for the 6-min walk test, MMSE mini-mental scale examination, RAVLT rey auditory verbal learning test, TMT trail making test
Fig. 2Scatterplots of SAI vs. TUG, 6MWT, MMSE, RAVLT, digit span, TMT-A, and TMT-B. The line represents the regression line, fitted to the data. SAI correlates significantly with all gait and neuropsychological tests. MMSE mini-mental scale examination, RAVLT rey auditory verbal learning test, TMT trail making test, TUG timed up and go test, 6MWT total walking distance for the 6-min walk test