Literature DB >> 31227588

Tracing the accumulation of in vivo human oral microbiota elucidates microbial community dynamics at the gateway to the GI tract.

Jinfeng Wang1, Zhen Jia1,2, Bing Zhang1, Lei Peng3, Fangqing Zhao1,2,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial translocation; gastrointestinal cancer; intestinal microbiology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31227588      PMCID: PMC7306975          DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


× No keyword cloud information.
With great interest we read the article by Gaiser et al 1 that enrichment of oral bacterial taxa in pancreatic cancer highlights the role of oral microbiota. Not coincidentally, the presence of Fusobacterium nucleatum in paired saliva and colon samples of the patients with colorectal cancer has been reported,2 3 raising interest in whether disease starts in the mouth or in the intestine.4–6 Another reason people are interested in oral microbes is their potentials serving as biomarkers for systemic diseases.3 7–9 In this study, we examined how long the collapsed bacterial community can recover to its initial state when suffering from disturbance and whether oral microbes have sufficient robustness to serve as biomarkers. We longitudinally tracked the re-assembling process of human oral biofilms after clinical scaling. Paired saliva and dental plaque samples were collected from nine subjects at 11 time points (figure 1A and online supplementary figure S1). The 16S rRNA V3–V4 regions of 169 samples were amplified and sequenced, and the generated reads were analysed using QIIME.10
Figure 1

Longitudinal dynamics of in vivo human oral microbiota. (A) Overview of the study design and sample collection. (B) The alpha diversity of the dental plaque and salivary microbiota over time. The shadow around the line shows a 95% CI. (C) The Bray-Curtis distance calculated at the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level across individual microbiota of the same time point. (D–E) The Bray-Curtis distance between microbiota of each time point and pre. Significance was measured using Wilcoxon rank-sum test (0.01>p>0.001, **; 0.05>p>0.01, *; p>0.05, ns). (F) The principal component (PC) analysis of dental plaque and saliva microbiota at each time point. The circle shows a 10% CI. (G–H) Tracing the source of OTUs in each time point. The dental plaque and saliva samples of the former time point were taken as potential sources of the latter time point. The bands of each colour indicate the top 100 most abundant OTUs. Green, brown and grey bands represent the sources of dental plaque, salivary and unknown, respectively. (I–J) The temporal changes of bacterial abundance at the phylum level.

Longitudinal dynamics of in vivo human oral microbiota. (A) Overview of the study design and sample collection. (B) The alpha diversity of the dental plaque and salivary microbiota over time. The shadow around the line shows a 95% CI. (C) The Bray-Curtis distance calculated at the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level across individual microbiota of the same time point. (D–E) The Bray-Curtis distance between microbiota of each time point and pre. Significance was measured using Wilcoxon rank-sum test (0.01>p>0.001, **; 0.05>p>0.01, *; p>0.05, ns). (F) The principal component (PC) analysis of dental plaque and saliva microbiota at each time point. The circle shows a 10% CI. (G–H) Tracing the source of OTUs in each time point. The dental plaque and saliva samples of the former time point were taken as potential sources of the latter time point. The bands of each colour indicate the top 100 most abundant OTUs. Green, brown and grey bands represent the sources of dental plaque, salivary and unknown, respectively. (I–J) The temporal changes of bacterial abundance at the phylum level. The microbial diversity of dental plaques fluctuated notably over time after destruction. In contrast, there was little change in salivary samples, where the differences among individuals at the same time point were relatively small (figure 1B and online supplementary figure S2). Likewise, a wave trough appeared in dental plaque at 3 days, where the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity among different individuals was the smallest (figure 1C). At the time points of before scaling (pre) and the very early stage (0–4 hours), the differences among plaque samples were obviously larger than those of free-floating saliva. The largest community distances to the original biofilm appeared between 7 hours and 3 days rather than 0–4 hours right after scaling (figure 1D). The plaque microbiota before 7 days was significantly different from pre (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p<0.05), while the salivary microbiota remained constant throughout the study (figure 1E). The unweighted principal component analysis clearly illustrated the dynamic process that plaque microbiota greatly deviated from the original state (pre) to the biofilm deconstruction after 1 day, rebuilt after 3 days and gradually recovered to its original intact form over time (figure 1F). In contrast, the temporal changes of saliva samples were not obvious. To track the microbial replenishment process, plaque and saliva samples at the former time point served as the potential sources to predict the origin of microbial operational taxonomic units in the latter time point. We found that the microbial transfer from saliva to plaque mainly happened between 1 day and 3 days (figure 1G–H). At the time points between 7 hours and 3 days, almost all of the bacterial phyla were at their highest or lowest abundances (figure 1I). The bacterial abundance of saliva, however, only slightly fluctuated at certain time points and then returned to their original level (figure 1J). The longitudinal gradient samples of the dental plaque were grouped into three clusters which represents the early, middle and mature phases of oral biofilm, respectively (figure 2A). When comparing each time point with pre, the change patterns of significantly changed genera (Wilcoxon test with false discovery rate correction, p<0.05) were diverse within each phase. The bacteria recovered in the early phase represented the first colonisers with quick feedback; the bacteria that underwent significant changes in the middle phase are secondary colonisers, interacting with the primary colonisers and paving the foundation for the successors; and the bacteria that reproduced continuously in the three phases but had not completely recovered at the end were members of long-term changes (online supplementary figure S3 and figure 2B). The bacteria that have undergone significant variations in the middle phase had the highest number of edges and positive correlations in the co-occurrence network analysis (r≥0.7 and p≤0.05), indicating that they may play a key role in the development of dental biofilm (figure 2C).
Figure 2

Microbial taxonomy and interaction of oral biofilms over time. (A) Clustering of the dental plaque microbiota at the genus level. (B) Significantly different genera of each time point compared with the time point pre. Wilcoxon rank-sum test with false discovery rate correction, p≤0.01. (C) Co-occurrence network of the significantly different genera. The thresholds of SparCC correlations were r≥0.7 and p≤0.05. The blue, pink and green lines represent the connection of two genera in the early phase (0 hour, 1 hour, 4 hours, 7 hours), the medium phase (1 day, 3 days, 7 days) and the late phase (2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, pre), respectively. The dotted and solid lines indicate negative correlation and positive correlation, respectively. The thickness of the line is proportional to the value of correlation. The size of the nodes is proportional to their relative abundance, and the number marked on each node represents the degree of this node.

Microbial taxonomy and interaction of oral biofilms over time. (A) Clustering of the dental plaque microbiota at the genus level. (B) Significantly different genera of each time point compared with the time point pre. Wilcoxon rank-sum test with false discovery rate correction, p≤0.01. (C) Co-occurrence network of the significantly different genera. The thresholds of SparCC correlations were r≥0.7 and p≤0.05. The blue, pink and green lines represent the connection of two genera in the early phase (0 hour, 1 hour, 4 hours, 7 hours), the medium phase (1 day, 3 days, 7 days) and the late phase (2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, pre), respectively. The dotted and solid lines indicate negative correlation and positive correlation, respectively. The thickness of the line is proportional to the value of correlation. The size of the nodes is proportional to their relative abundance, and the number marked on each node represents the degree of this node. As the gateway and source of microbial down-transmission to the GI tract, the oral cavity is in a vital position. Our study uncovered the recovery and long-term stability of the oral microbiota after strong disturbance, and identified the key time points and phases of the most dramatic community changes and structural recovery. These findings suggest that when considering the use of oral bacteria as biomarkers to predict digestive system diseases, collection time and site should be taken into consideration. This study provides an opportunity to evaluate whether oral bacteria are suitable for disease prediction and promotes the development of non-invasive diagnostic techniques.
  10 in total

1.  Human oral microbiome and prospective risk for pancreatic cancer: a population-based nested case-control study.

Authors:  Xiaozhou Fan; Alexander V Alekseyenko; Jing Wu; Brandilyn A Peters; Eric J Jacobs; Susan M Gapstur; Mark P Purdue; Christian C Abnet; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon; George Miller; Jacques Ravel; Richard B Hayes; Jiyoung Ahn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Variations of oral microbiota are associated with pancreatic diseases including pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  James J Farrell; Lei Zhang; Hui Zhou; David Chia; David Elashoff; David Akin; Bruce J Paster; Kaumudi Joshipura; David T W Wong
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Ectopic colonization of oral bacteria in the intestine drives TH1 cell induction and inflammation.

Authors:  Koji Atarashi; Wataru Suda; Chengwei Luo; Takaaki Kawaguchi; Iori Motoo; Seiko Narushima; Yuya Kiguchi; Keiko Yasuma; Eiichiro Watanabe; Takeshi Tanoue; Christoph A Thaiss; Mayuko Sato; Kiminori Toyooka; Heba S Said; Hirokazu Yamagami; Scott A Rice; Dirk Gevers; Ryan C Johnson; Julia A Segre; Kong Chen; Jay K Kolls; Eran Elinav; Hidetoshi Morita; Ramnik J Xavier; Masahira Hattori; Kenya Honda
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Justin Kuczynski; Jesse Stombaugh; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth K Costello; Noah Fierer; Antonio Gonzalez Peña; Julia K Goodrich; Jeffrey I Gordon; Gavin A Huttley; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Jeremy E Koenig; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Daniel McDonald; Brian D Muegge; Meg Pirrung; Jens Reeder; Joel R Sevinsky; Peter J Turnbaugh; William A Walters; Jeremy Widmann; Tanya Yatsunenko; Jesse Zaneveld; Rob Knight
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Metagenomic analysis of colorectal cancer datasets identifies cross-cohort microbial diagnostic signatures and a link with choline degradation.

Authors:  Andrew Maltez Thomas; Paolo Manghi; Francesco Asnicar; Edoardo Pasolli; Federica Armanini; Moreno Zolfo; Francesco Beghini; Serena Manara; Nicolai Karcher; Chiara Pozzi; Sara Gandini; Davide Serrano; Sonia Tarallo; Antonio Francavilla; Gaetano Gallo; Mario Trompetto; Giulio Ferrero; Sayaka Mizutani; Hirotsugu Shiroma; Satoshi Shiba; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Shinichi Yachida; Takuji Yamada; Jakob Wirbel; Petra Schrotz-King; Cornelia M Ulrich; Hermann Brenner; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Peer Bork; Georg Zeller; Francesca Cordero; Emmanuel Dias-Neto; João Carlos Setubal; Adrian Tett; Barbara Pardini; Maria Rescigno; Levi Waldron; Alessio Naccarati; Nicola Segata
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 87.241

6.  Extensive transmission of microbes along the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Thomas Sb Schmidt; Matthew R Hayward; Luis P Coelho; Simone S Li; Paul I Costea; Anita Y Voigt; Jakob Wirbel; Oleksandr M Maistrenko; Renato Jc Alves; Emma Bergsten; Carine de Beaufort; Iradj Sobhani; Anna Heintz-Buschart; Shinichi Sunagawa; Georg Zeller; Paul Wilmes; Peer Bork
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Enrichment of oral microbiota in early cystic precursors to invasive pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Rogier Aäron Gaiser; Asif Halimi; Hassan Alkharaan; Liyan Lu; Haleh Davanian; Katie Healy; Luisa W Hugerth; Zeeshan Ateeb; Roberto Valente; Carlos Fernández Moro; Marco Del Chiaro; Margaret Sällberg Chen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The oral microbiota in colorectal cancer is distinctive and predictive.

Authors:  Burkhardt Flemer; Ryan D Warren; Maurice P Barrett; Katryna Cisek; Anubhav Das; Ian B Jeffery; Eimear Hurley; Micheal O'Riordain; Fergus Shanahan; Paul W O'Toole
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Dysbiosis of maternal and neonatal microbiota associated with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jinfeng Wang; Jiayong Zheng; Wenyu Shi; Nan Du; Xiaomin Xu; Yanming Zhang; Peifeng Ji; Fengyi Zhang; Zhen Jia; Yeping Wang; Zhi Zheng; Hongping Zhang; Fangqing Zhao
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Patients with colorectal cancer have identical strains of Fusobacterium nucleatum in their colorectal cancer and oral cavity.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Komiya; Yumi Shimomura; Takuma Higurashi; Yutaka Sugi; Jun Arimoto; Shotaro Umezawa; Shiori Uchiyama; Mitsuharu Matsumoto; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 23.059

  10 in total
  15 in total

1.  Oral microbiome and risk of malignant esophageal lesions in a high-risk area of China: A nested case-control study.

Authors:  Fangfang Liu; Mengfei Liu; Ying Liu; Chuanhai Guo; Yunlai Zhou; Fenglei Li; Ruiping Xu; Zhen Liu; Qiuju Deng; Xiang Li; Chaoting Zhang; Yaqi Pan; Tao Ning; Xiao Dong; Zhe Hu; Huanyu Bao; Hong Cai; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Zhonghu He; Yang Ke
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Longitudinal Multi-omics and Microbiome Meta-analysis Identify an Asymptomatic Gingival State That Links Gingivitis, Periodontitis, and Aging.

Authors:  Shi Huang; Tao He; Feng Yue; Xiujun Xu; Lijiang Wang; Pengfei Zhu; Fei Teng; Zheng Sun; Xiaohui Liu; Gongchao Jing; Xiaoquan Su; Lijian Jin; Jiquan Liu; Jian Xu
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 7.867

3.  Comparative Analysis of Salivary Mycobiome Diversity in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients.

Authors:  Shenghua Chang; Haiying Guo; Jin Li; Yaoting Ji; Han Jiang; Lianguo Ruan; Minquan Du
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 4.  A practical guide to amplicon and metagenomic analysis of microbiome data.

Authors:  Yong-Xin Liu; Yuan Qin; Tong Chen; Meiping Lu; Xubo Qian; Xiaoxuan Guo; Yang Bai
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 14.870

5.  Translocation of vaginal microbiota is involved in impairment and protection of uterine health.

Authors:  Jinfeng Wang; Zhanzhan Li; Xiuling Ma; Lifeng Du; Zhen Jia; Xue Cui; Liqun Yu; Jing Yang; Liwen Xiao; Bing Zhang; Huimin Fan; Fangqing Zhao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Analysis of 16S rRNA genes reveals reduced Fusobacterial community diversity when translocating from saliva to GI sites.

Authors:  Miles Richardson; Jihui Ren; Mara Roxana Rubinstein; Jamila A Taylor; Richard A Friedman; Bo Shen; Yiping W Han
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2020-11-09

7.  Topic Application of the Probiotic Streptococcus dentisani Improves Clinical and Microbiological Parameters Associated With Oral Health.

Authors:  María D Ferrer; Aranzazu López-López; Teodora Nicolescu; Salvadora Perez-Vilaplana; Alba Boix-Amorós; Majda Dzidic; Sandra Garcia; Alejandro Artacho; Carmen Llena; Alex Mira
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  Alteration of salivary microbiome in periodontitis with or without type-2 diabetes mellitus and metformin treatment.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Sun; Meihui Li; Li Xia; Zhaohui Fang; Shenjun Yu; Jike Gao; Qiang Feng; Pishan Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Another Look at the Contribution of Oral Microbiota to the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Berthelot; Octave Nadile Bandiaky; Benoit Le Goff; Gilles Amador; Anne-Gaelle Chaux; Assem Soueidan; Frederic Denis
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-12-28

10.  Metagenomics of the modern and historical human oral microbiome with phylogenetic studies on Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus.

Authors:  Mark Achtman; Zhemin Zhou
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.