Linda J Wang1, Adam Tanious2, Catherine Go3, Dawn M Coleman4, Sophia K McKinley2, Matthew J Eagleton2, W Darrin Clouse2, Mark F Conrad2. 1. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: ljwang2@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. 3. Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa. 4. Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Trainee burnout is on the rise and negative training environments may contribute. In addition, as the proportion of women entering vascular surgery increases, identifying factors that challenge recruitment and retention is vital as we grow our workforce to meet demand. This study sought to characterize the learning environment of vascular residents and to determine how gender-based discrimination and bias (GBDB) affect the clinical experience. METHODS: A survey was developed to evaluate the trainee experience; demographics and a two-item burnout index were also included. The instrument was sent electronically to all integrated (0 + 5) vascular surgery residents in the United States. Univariate analyses were performed and predictors of burnout identified. RESULTS: A total of 284 integrated vascular residents were invited to participate and 212 (75%) completed the survey. Participants were predominantly male (64%) and white (56%), with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range, 28-32 years). Seventy-nine percent of respondents endorsed some form of negative workplace experience and 30% met high-risk criteria for burnout. More than a third (38%) of residents endorsed personally experiencing GBDB, with a significant difference between men and women (14% vs 80%; P < .001). Women were more likely than men to report witnessing GBDB (76% vs 56%; P = .003). Patients and nurses were the most frequently cited sources of GBDB (80% and 64%, respectively), with vascular surgery attendings cited by 41% of trainees. One in four female resident respondents indicated being sexually harassed during the course of training; this was significantly higher than for male residents (25% vs 1%; P < .001). Nearly half (46%) of trainees who witnessed or experienced GBDB thought that quality of patient care, job satisfaction, personal well-being, and personal risk of burnout were directly affected as a result of GBDB. GBDB was predictive of burnout (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.5; P = .04), as were longer work hours (>80 h/wk; odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.1; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: GBDB was experienced by 38% of integrated trainees, with women significantly more affected than men. GBDB is predictive of burnout, and this has significant implications for our specialty in the recruitment and retention of female physicians. Resources addressing these issues are needed to maintain a diverse workforce and to promote physician well-being.
OBJECTIVE: Trainee burnout is on the rise and negative training environments may contribute. In addition, as the proportion of women entering vascular surgery increases, identifying factors that challenge recruitment and retention is vital as we grow our workforce to meet demand. This study sought to characterize the learning environment of vascular residents and to determine how gender-based discrimination and bias (GBDB) affect the clinical experience. METHODS: A survey was developed to evaluate the trainee experience; demographics and a two-item burnout index were also included. The instrument was sent electronically to all integrated (0 + 5) vascular surgery residents in the United States. Univariate analyses were performed and predictors of burnout identified. RESULTS: A total of 284 integrated vascular residents were invited to participate and 212 (75%) completed the survey. Participants were predominantly male (64%) and white (56%), with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range, 28-32 years). Seventy-nine percent of respondents endorsed some form of negative workplace experience and 30% met high-risk criteria for burnout. More than a third (38%) of residents endorsed personally experiencing GBDB, with a significant difference between men and women (14% vs 80%; P < .001). Women were more likely than men to report witnessing GBDB (76% vs 56%; P = .003). Patients and nurses were the most frequently cited sources of GBDB (80% and 64%, respectively), with vascular surgery attendings cited by 41% of trainees. One in four female resident respondents indicated being sexually harassed during the course of training; this was significantly higher than for male residents (25% vs 1%; P < .001). Nearly half (46%) of trainees who witnessed or experienced GBDB thought that quality of patient care, job satisfaction, personal well-being, and personal risk of burnout were directly affected as a result of GBDB. GBDB was predictive of burnout (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.5; P = .04), as were longer work hours (>80 h/wk; odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.1; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS:GBDB was experienced by 38% of integrated trainees, with women significantly more affected than men. GBDB is predictive of burnout, and this has significant implications for our specialty in the recruitment and retention of female physicians. Resources addressing these issues are needed to maintain a diverse workforce and to promote physician well-being.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Michael R Oreskovich; Lotte N Dyrbye; Daniel V Satele; John B Hanks; Jeff A Sloan; Charles M Balch Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Edward J Arous; Dejah R Judelson; Jessica P Simons; Francesco A Aiello; Danielle R Doucet; Elias J Arous; Louis M Messina; Andres Schanzer Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Sophia K McKinley; Linda J Wang; Rajshri M Gartland; Maggie L Westfal; Christina L Costantino; Dana Schwartz; Andrea L Merrill; Emil Petrusa; Keith Lillemoe; Roy Phitayakorn Journal: Acad Med Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Arianna L Gianakos; Julie A Freischlag; Angela M Mercurio; R Sterling Haring; Dawn M LaPorte; Mary K Mulcahey; Lisa K Cannada; John G Kennedy Journal: World J Surg Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Herrick Nadine Fisher; Paula Chatterjee; Sophia Bellin Warren; Maria A Yialamas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Matthew C Chia; Yue-Yung Hu; Ruojia Debbie Li; Elaine O Cheung; Joshua S Eng; Tiannan Zhan; Malachi G Sheahan; Karl Y Bilimoria; Dawn M Coleman Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Shalila S de Bourmont; Arun Burra; Sarah S Nouri; Neveen El-Farra; Dinushika Mohottige; Caroline Sloan; Sarah Schaeffer; Jodi Friedman; Alicia Fernandez Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-11-02