Michael J Silverberg1, Wendy A Leyden2, Jennifer O Lam2, Steven E Gregorich3, Megan J Huchko4, Shalini Kulasingam5, Miriam Kuppermann6, Karen K Smith-McCune7, George F Sawaya6. 1. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA. Electronic address: michael.j.silverberg@kp.org. 2. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The population effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) catch-up vaccination, defined in the USA as first vaccination at ages 13-26 years, has not been studied extensively. We aimed to assess the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2, CIN3, adenocarcinoma in situ, or cancer (CIN2+ and CIN3+) by prior HPV vaccination status, age at first dose, and number of doses in women participating in a screening programme within a large integrated health-care system. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study of women enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (an integrated health-care delivery system in California, USA). Cases were women with CIN2+ or CIN3+ confirmed by histology between Jan 1, 1995, and June 30, 2014, and incidence density-selected controls were age-matched women without CIN2+ or CIN3+ at the time each case occurred. For each case, we randomly selected five controls. Cases and controls were aged 26 years or younger when the HPV quadrivalent vaccine became available in 2006. Rate ratios (RRs) from conditional logistic regression were estimated by age at time of first HPV quadrivalent vaccine dose (14-17 years, 18-20 years, and ≥21 years), and number of doses (one, two, and three or more doses) compared with no prior vaccination, with adjustment for smoking, hormonal contraceptive prescription, race or ethnicity, sexually transmitted infections, immunosuppression, parity, and number of outpatient visits. FINDINGS: 4357 incident CIN2+ cases and 21 773 matched controls were included in the study. Of these, 1849 were incident CIN3+ cases with 9242 matched controls. The youngest age at time of first vaccination was 14 years. One or more HPV vaccine doses conferred protection against CIN2+ (RR 0·82, 95% CI 0·73-0·93) and CIN3+ (0·77, 0·64-0·94). We found the strongest protection against CIN2+ in women who had received at least three vaccine doses and had received their first dose aged 14-17 years (0·52, 0·36-0·74) or aged 18-20 years (0·65, 0·49-0·88). No significant protection was found in women aged 21 years or older at time of first dose (0·94, 0·81-1·09). Inferences were similar for CIN3+, but with stronger effects for women who received at least three vaccine doses and had received their first dose aged 14-17 years (0·27, 0·13-0·56) or aged 18-20 years (0·59, 0·36-0·97). INTERPRETATION: Catch-up quadrivalent HPV vaccination with three doses was effective against CIN2+ and CIN3+ in girls and women aged 14-20 years at time of first vaccine dose but not for women aged 21 years and older at first dose. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.
BACKGROUND: The population effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) catch-up vaccination, defined in the USA as first vaccination at ages 13-26 years, has not been studied extensively. We aimed to assess the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2, CIN3, adenocarcinoma in situ, or cancer (CIN2+ and CIN3+) by prior HPV vaccination status, age at first dose, and number of doses in women participating in a screening programme within a large integrated health-care system. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study of women enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (an integrated health-care delivery system in California, USA). Cases were women with CIN2+ or CIN3+ confirmed by histology between Jan 1, 1995, and June 30, 2014, and incidence density-selected controls were age-matched women without CIN2+ or CIN3+ at the time each case occurred. For each case, we randomly selected five controls. Cases and controls were aged 26 years or younger when the HPV quadrivalent vaccine became available in 2006. Rate ratios (RRs) from conditional logistic regression were estimated by age at time of first HPV quadrivalent vaccine dose (14-17 years, 18-20 years, and ≥21 years), and number of doses (one, two, and three or more doses) compared with no prior vaccination, with adjustment for smoking, hormonal contraceptive prescription, race or ethnicity, sexually transmitted infections, immunosuppression, parity, and number of outpatient visits. FINDINGS: 4357 incident CIN2+ cases and 21 773 matched controls were included in the study. Of these, 1849 were incident CIN3+ cases with 9242 matched controls. The youngest age at time of first vaccination was 14 years. One or more HPV vaccine doses conferred protection against CIN2+ (RR 0·82, 95% CI 0·73-0·93) and CIN3+ (0·77, 0·64-0·94). We found the strongest protection against CIN2+ in women who had received at least three vaccine doses and had received their first dose aged 14-17 years (0·52, 0·36-0·74) or aged 18-20 years (0·65, 0·49-0·88). No significant protection was found in women aged 21 years or older at time of first dose (0·94, 0·81-1·09). Inferences were similar for CIN3+, but with stronger effects for women who received at least three vaccine doses and had received their first dose aged 14-17 years (0·27, 0·13-0·56) or aged 18-20 years (0·59, 0·36-0·97). INTERPRETATION: Catch-up quadrivalent HPV vaccination with three doses was effective against CIN2+ and CIN3+ in girls and women aged 14-20 years at time of first vaccine dose but not for women aged 21 years and older at first dose. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Susan Hariri; Nancy M Bennett; Linda M Niccolai; Sean Schafer; Ina U Park; Karen C Bloch; Elizabeth R Unger; Erin Whitney; Pamela Julian; Mary W Scahill; Nasreen Abdullah; Diane Levine; Michelle L Johnson; Martin Steinau; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: Vaccine Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Birgitte Baldur-Felskov; Christian Dehlendorff; Jette Junge; Christian Munk; Susanne K Kjaer Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Susan Hariri; Michelle L Johnson; Nancy M Bennett; Heidi M Bauer; Ina U Park; Sean Schafer; Linda M Niccolai; Elizabeth R Unger; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Annika M Hofstetter; Danielle C Ompad; Melissa S Stockwell; Susan L Rosenthal; Karen Soren Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Jong Kim; Christopher Bell; Maggie Sun; Gordon Kliewer; Linan Xu; Maria McInerney; Lawrence W Svenson; Huiming Yang Journal: CMAJ Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: K G J Pollock; K Kavanagh; A Potts; J Love; K Cuschieri; H Cubie; C Robertson; M Cruickshank; T J Palmer; S Nicoll; M Donaghy Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Elizabeth Crowe; Nirmala Pandeya; Julia M L Brotherton; Annette J Dobson; Stephen Kisely; Stephen B Lambert; David C Whiteman Journal: BMJ Date: 2014-03-04
Authors: Anne F Rositch; Eshan U Patel; Molly R Petersen; Thomas C Quinn; Patti E Gravitt; Aaron A R Tobian Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Maarten F Schim van der Loeff; Alex Vorsters; Elske Marra; Pierre Van Damme; Arjan Hogewoning Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Molly A Feder; Shalini L Kulasingam; Nancy B Kiviat; Constance Mao; Erik J Nelson; Rachel L Winer; Hilary K Whitham; John Lin; Stephen E Hawes Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Michael J Silverberg; Wendy A Leyden; Jennifer O Lam; Chun R Chao; Steven E Gregorich; Megan J Huchko; Shalini Kulasingam; Miriam Kuppermann; Karen K Smith-McCune; George F Sawaya Journal: Vaccine Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Elissa Meites; Rachel L Winer; Michael E Newcomb; Pamina M Gorbach; Troy D Querec; Jessica Rudd; Tom Collins; John Lin; Janell Moore; Thomas Remble; Fred Swanson; Justin Franz; Robert K Bolan; Matthew R Golden; Brian Mustanski; Richard A Crosby; Elizabeth R Unger; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Michelle L Johnson Jones; Julia Warner Gargano; Melissa Powell; Ina U Park; Linda M Niccolai; Nancy M Bennett; Marie R Griffin; Troy Querec; Elizabeth R Unger; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Proma Paul; Anne Hammer; Anne F Rositch; Anne E Burke; Raphael P Viscidi; Michelle I Silver; Nicole Campos; Ada O Youk; Patti E Gravitt Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 5.226