Literature DB >> 31218459

Impacts of broadband sound on silver (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead (H. nobilis) carp hearing thresholds determined using auditory evoked potential audiometry.

Andrew C Nissen1, Brooke J Vetter2, Loranzie S Rogers1, Allen F Mensinger1.   

Abstract

Invasive silver (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead (H. nobilis) carp, collectively referred to as bigheaded carps, threaten aquatic ecosystems of the Upper Midwestern USA. Due to the extensive ecological impacts associated with these species, prevention of their further range expansion is the aim for fisheries management. Recent behavioral studies indicate bigheaded carps are deterred by acoustic barriers and exhibit negative phonotaxis in response to anthropogenic sound sources (≥ 150 dB re 1 μPa). However, the impact of long-term exposure to these sounds on the hearing capabilities of bigheaded carps has not been well documented. In this study, the auditory evoked potential (AEP) technique was used to determine auditory thresholds among bigheaded carps before and after exposure to high intensity (155.7 ± 4.7 dB re 1 μPa SPLrms; - 8.0 ± 4.7 dB re 1 ms-2 PALrms; mean ± SD) broadband sound. Fish were exposed to sound for 30 min or 24 h and AEP measurements were taken at three time points: immediately after exposure, 48 h, or 96 h later. Results indicate that silver and bighead carp experience temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) in frequency detection following sound exposure with the magnitude and length of TTS correlated with exposure duration. The findings from this study will be used to increase the long-term efficacy of acoustical deterrent measures aimed at preventing further range expansion of bigheaded carps.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory evoked potential; Bighead carp; Broadband sound; Invasive carp; Silver carp; Temporary threshold shift

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31218459     DOI: 10.1007/s10695-019-00657-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 0920-1742            Impact factor:   2.794


  20 in total

1.  Rethinking sound detection by fishes.

Authors:  Arthur N Popper; Richard R Fay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat.

Authors:  D L Jewett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-06

3.  Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans.

Authors:  D L Jewett; J S Williston
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  The auditory brain stem response in five vertebrate classes.

Authors:  J T Corwin; T H Bullock; J Schweitzer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-12

5.  Sound reception and processing in the carp: saccular potentials.

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1974-09-01

6.  Effects of underwater noise on auditory sensitivity of a cyprinid fish.

Authors:  A R Scholik; H Y Yan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Auditory saccular sensitivity of the vocal Lusitanian toadfish: low frequency tuning allows acoustic communication throughout the year.

Authors:  Raquel O Vasconcelos; Joseph A Sisneros; M Clara P Amorim; Paulo J Fonseca
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes.

Authors:  D A Mann; D M Higgs; W N Tavolga; M J Souza; A N Popper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Age- and size-related changes in the inner ear and hearing ability of the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Dennis M Higgs; Marcy J Souza; Heather R Wilkins; Joelle C Presson; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-06

10.  Acoustical stress and hearing sensitivity in fishes: does the linear threshold shift hypothesis hold water?

Authors:  Michael E Smith; Andrew S Kane; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of biological and anthropogenic sound on the auditory sensitivity of oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau.

Authors:  Loranzie S Rogers; Rosalyn L Putland; Allen F Mensinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 1.836

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.