Literature DB >> 31217427

Association between the pig genome and its gut microbiota composition.

Daniel Crespo-Piazuelo1,2, Lourdes Migura-Garcia3, Jordi Estellé4, Lourdes Criado-Mesas5, Manuel Revilla5,6, Anna Castelló5,6, María Muñoz7,8, Juan M García-Casco7,8, Ana I Fernández7, Maria Ballester3, Josep M Folch5,6.   

Abstract

The gut microbiota has been evolving with its host along the time creating a symbiotic relationship. In this study, we assess the role of the host genome in the modulation of the microbiota composition in pigs. Gut microbiota compositions were estimated through sequencing the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from rectal contents of 285 pigs. A total of 1,261 operational taxonomic units were obtained and grouped in 18 phyla and 101 genera. Firmicutes (45.36%) and Bacteroidetes (37.47%) were the two major phyla obtained, whereas at genus level Prevotella (7.03%) and Treponema (6.29%) were the most abundant. Pigs were also genotyped with a high-throughput method for 45,508 single nucleotide polymorphisms that covered the entire pig genome. Subsequently, genome-wide association studies were made among the genotypes of these pigs and their gut microbiota composition. A total of 52 single-nucleotide polymorphisms distributed in 17 regions along the pig genome were associated with the relative abundance of six genera; Akkermansia, CF231, Phascolarctobacterium, Prevotella, SMB53, and Streptococcus. Our results suggest 39 candidate genes that may be modulating the microbiota composition and manifest the association between host genome and gut microbiota in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31217427      PMCID: PMC6584621          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45066-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

The digestive tract of animals has been evolving along the time with symbiotic microorganisms. These microbes, mostly bacteria, have adapted to thrive in such conditions forming complex and vital interactions among them and their host[1,2]. The ecological community of these microorganisms is called microbiome, and the interactions with the host can be commensal, pathogenic or mutualistic[3]. In this scenario, mutualistic gut microbiota provides the host with beneficial functions that the host cannot perform, such as digesting complex polysaccharides, producing vitamins, and preventing colonization by pathogens[2,4]. Likewise, commensal gut populations modulate hosts’ immune responses which can modify the microbiota composition in order to maintain gut homeostasis[4]. Therefore, apart from the host genetics, the complexity of the interactions increases taking into account factors such as age, diet, environment, disease, or maternal seeding which are known to influence gut microbial communities[5]. The intestinal epithelium acts as a barrier, protecting deeper tissues from bacterial entry[2]. Supporting this defence system, the gut epithelial surface is coated with a mucous layer formed by mucin glycoproteins[6,7]. While the small intestine has only one layer which is permeable to bacteria[6], the mucous layer of the colon is structured in two parts: a dense inner layer firmly attached to the gut epithelium that minimizes bacterial-epithelial cell contact, and a loose outer layer that can be broken down by commensal bacteria[7]. In this outer mucous layer, the metabolites produced by these bacteria interact with the host stimulating the innate and adaptive immune responses[2]. For instance, host innate immunity can select for a species-specific microbiota using microbicidal proteins[8]. However, the host also has mechanisms to tolerate the metabolites from non-pathogenic bacteria[2], just as certain bacteria trigger the host immune system for self-benefit[9]. In these recent years, high-throughput sequencing technologies have greatly improved the study of bacterial populations without performing microbial cultures. The microbial 16S rRNA gene sequencing is commonly used to estimate the microbiota composition, while the shotgun sequencing of DNA fragments isolated after shearing faecal or other samples is used for the metagenome (all the microbial collective genomes) characterization[10]. Recently, whole-metagenome sequencing has been used to obtain the reference gene catalogue of the pig gut microbiome[11]. This study revealed that the reference catalogue of the porcine gut microbiome shared more non-redundant genes between human and pig than human and mouse[11], suggesting pig as a better animal model than mouse because of their similarity with humans. Both species are omnivores and have monogastric digestive tracts which are analogous in anatomy, immunology and physiology[12]. The heritability of the microbial genera composition of the pig gut has been reported to range from low to high values[13,14]. Accordingly, host genetics has been suggested as an important factor in the determination of gut microbial composition[15]. However, there are limited studies measuring the contribution of inter-individual variability modulating the bacterial communities and the effect of host polymorphisms on the establishment of the microbiota[16]. In this context, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which have been widely used to analyse a plethora of complex traits, are now being used to study the link between the host and its microbiota composition[15,16]. With this approach, Blekhman et al.[17] were the first to describe in humans the relationship between the abundance of Bifidobacterium and the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) close to the lactase gene. In this case, lactase non-persistent recessive individuals who drink milk cannot break down lactose and thus, Bifidobacterium thrives using this available sugar[18]. Conversely, host genetics appeared to have a minor impact in the microbiota compared with age, diet or the environment[19]. It is not surprising, since conditions are difficult to standardize between individuals. In this regard, production pigs represent a perfect model to measure the effect of host genetics in shaping the microbiota due to their similar diet and environmental factors during their whole rearing cycle, but the relationship between the pig genome and its gut microbiota composition has not yet been fully described[20]. The objective of this study was to identify genomic regions that influence the gut microbiota composition through host-microbiota associations in pigs. For this purpose, the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced from rectal contents of 288 pigs genotyped with a high-throughput method.

Materials and Methods

Ethics approval

All animal manipulations were performed according to the regulations of the Spanish Policy for Animal Protection RD53/2013, which meets the European Union Directive 2010/63/EU about the protection of animals used in experimentation. Pigs were slaughter in a commercial abattoir following national and institutional guidelines for Good Experimental Practices.

Animal material

A total of 288 healthy commercial F1 crossbred pigs (Duroc × Iberian) were used in this study. All animals were maintained in the same farm under intensive conditions and feeding was ad libitum with a barley- and wheat-based commercial diet. Pigs with an average weight of 138.8 kg (SD = 11.46 kg) were slaughtered in a commercial abattoir in four distinct days. Samples of rectal content and Longissimus dorsi muscle were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and later stored at −80 °C.

Microbial DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing

For each one of the 288 samples, the DNA of 0.2 g of rectal content was extracted with PowerFecal kit (MoBio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. DNA purity and concentration were measured through a ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The amplification of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was performed following the recommendations of the 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation guide (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Full description of primer sequences and methods used can be accessed at Supplementary Information S1. All the 288 amplicon pooled libraries were sequenced in three runs of a MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) instrument in the Sequencing Service of the FISABIO (Fundació per al Foment de la Investigació Sanitària i Biomèdica de la Comunitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain) using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (600-cycle format, 2 × 300 bp paired-end reads). A mean of 104,115 reads for each sample was obtained (17.991 Gb in total), ranging from 34,186 to 218,360 reads, except for one outlier that was discarded because it had 1,758,983 reads.

Taxonomy classification and diversity studies of the gut samples

Bioinformatics analysis were performed in QIIME v.1.9.1[21] by using the QIIME’s subsampled open-reference operational taxonomic unit (OTU) calling approach and following the recommendations of Rideout et al.[22]. In brief, the join_paired_ends.py function in QIIME was used to merge the forward and reverse reads contained in the fastq files of the remaining 287 samples. The quality control and the filtering process was made pursuant to the considerations provided by Bokulich et al.[23]. Therefore, the split_libraries_fastq.py command was used to demultiplex and filter (at Phred ≥ Q20) the fastq sequence data. After this step, OTUs were identified by using the pick_open_reference_otus.py function with a subsampled percentage of 10% (s = 0.1). Subsequently, chimera detection was carried on in QIIME with BLAST[24] and OTUs were taxonomically annotated employing the Greengenes 13.8 database[25]. At this point, two samples did not satisfy the quality filters and were discarded. Thus, for the remaining 285 samples, a dataset containing 1,294 OTUs was obtained after filtering out singletons and OTUs representing less than 0.005% of the total number of annotated reads[23]. From this dataset, 33 OTUs had missing taxonomic ranks and were discarded. Finally, 1,261 OTUs in the 285 samples were considered for further analysis (Supplementary Table S1). The 1,261 OTUs were grouped in 18 phyla and 101 genera through the tax_glom method within the phyloseq package[26] in R (www.r-project.org). Besides, genera that belonged to a higher taxonomy rank but lacked the genus information were merged and marked as unspecified (g__unsp). The analyses of α and β-diversities in the 285 samples were carried on with the vegan R package[27], and the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot was performed using phyloseq[26] and ggplot2[28]. For the α-diversity study, the Shannon index was employed, whereas the β-diversity study was represented using the Whittaker index. Additionally, the dissimilarity between pairs of samples was estimated with the NMDS method using the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity[29].

Host DNA extraction and SNP genotyping

Pig genomic DNA was extracted from the Longissimus dorsi muscle of all the 288 samples using the standard phenol-chloroform method[30]. The DNA concentration and purity was measured with a ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop) afterwards. A total of 288 pigs were genotyped with the GeneSeek Genomic Profiler (GGP) Porcine HD v1 (70 K) array (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using the Infinium HD Assay Ultra protocol (Illumina). Genotypes were obtained with the GenomeStudio software (2011.1 version, Illumina) and filtered with the PLINK software[31] (1.90b5 version). Further analyses were conducted using only SNPs that mapped in the Sscrofa11.1 assembly, with a minor allele frequency (MAF) >5% and missing genotypes <5%, retaining a total of 45,508 SNPs.

GWAS analysis

For the 285 samples, GWAS between the microbiota composition at genus level and the 45,508 genotyped SNPs were made. Samples were normalized in percentages based on the number of annotated reads per sample (relative abundance). To avoid errors caused by low abundant genera, GWAS were performed only in genera that comprised more than the 0.5% of the total annotated reads and were present in more than the 90% of the samples. In addition, genera marked as unspecified were excluded from the GWAS analysis. Therefore, GWAS were performed in 18 of the 101 genera found. For the GWAS analysis, the following univariate linear mixed model was applied using the GEMMA software[32] (0.96 version):where yijkl indicates the vector of phenotypic observations in the kth individual; sex (two categories) and batch (4 categories) are fixed effects; uk is the infinitesimal genetic effect considered as random and distributed as N(0, Kσu), where K is the numerator of the kinship matrix; δk is a −1, 0, +1 indicator variable depending on the kth individual genotype for the lth SNP; al represents the additive effect associated with the lth SNP; and eijkl is the residual. The false discovery rate (FDR) method developed by Benjamini and Hochberg[33] was applied for multiple test correction using the p.adjust function incorporated in R. The cut-off for considering a SNP as significant was set at FDR ≤ 0.1. Two significant SNPs were grouped inside the same interval if the distance between them was less than 2 Mb.

Gene annotation and functional prediction

The associated regions in the pig genome were annotated at 1 Mb on each side of the previously defined intervals. The genes contained in these regions were extracted using the BioMart tool[34] from the Ensembl project (www.ensembl.org; release 92) using the Sscrofa11.1 reference assembly. In addition, the functional consequences of the significant SNPs were predicted through the Variant Effect Predictor tool[35] from the Ensembl project (release 92).

Results and Discussion

Microbiota composition and diversity

A mean of 104,115 reads per sample were obtained with a MiSeq (Illumina) after sequencing the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from rectal contents of 288 pigs. A total of 1,261 OTUs which were grouped in 18 phyla and 101 genera were found in the 285 samples that fulfilled the quality criteria. At phylum level, Firmicutes (45.36%) and Bacteroidetes (37.47%) were the more abundant (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table S2). In accordance with the literature[36,37], Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are usually the most dominant phyla found in colon and faeces of pigs. The most abundant genera, not marked as unspecified, were Prevotella (7.03%) and Treponema (6.29%) (Supplementary Table S3). Accordingly, Prevotella spp. are frequently found as one of the most abundant genus in the lower intestine and faeces[36,37]. However, comparisons between different studies should be made with caution, since differences in microbiota composition are conditional on the different sets of primers used in the analysis, breeds (host genetic background), age of the animals at sampling time, and environmental factors such as dietary composition[14,38].
Figure 1

Stacked area plot of OTUs grouped by phyla for the 285 pig rectal samples.

Stacked area plot of OTUs grouped by phyla for the 285 pig rectal samples. To obtain a measure for the number of different OTUs and their relative abundance within each of the 285 samples, the community α-diversity was calculated through the Shannon index (Fig. 2a). The mean of the α-diversity was 5.55, ranging from 4.97 to 5.93. It is not surprising, since the distal part of the pig gut usually has a higher α-diversity than the rest of the intestine[37]. In addition, the β-diversity was used to measure the differences between samples through the Whittaker index (Fig. 2b) obtaining a mean distance to the centroid of 0.10. Lastly, a NMDS plot was performed to observe the dissimilarities between samples employing Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (Fig. 2c). The β-diversity was closer to 0, indicating that the global microbiota composition was quite similar along the 285 samples. Furthermore, this low β-diversity was expected, since the pigs from our study have been subjected to the same diet and environmental factors during their whole rearing cycle and this uniformity is reinforced by the absence of clustering in the NMDS plot. This way, overall diversity results reinforce the appropriateness of the model to measure the effect of host genetics in shaping the microbiota.
Figure 2

Plots showing the diversities and dissimilarities measured using the 1,261 OTUs found in rectal contents of 285 pigs. (a) Boxplot of the Shannon α-diversity. (b) Boxplot of the Whittaker β-diversity calculated through the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. (c) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities. The size of the dot is proportional to the total number of annotated reads in each sample.

Plots showing the diversities and dissimilarities measured using the 1,261 OTUs found in rectal contents of 285 pigs. (a) Boxplot of the Shannon α-diversity. (b) Boxplot of the Whittaker β-diversity calculated through the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. (c) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities. The size of the dot is proportional to the total number of annotated reads in each sample.

GWAS results

GWAS were performed using 45,508 SNPs genotyped in 285 animals and the relative abundance of 18 genera; Akkermansia, Bacteroides, CF231, Coprococcus, Fibrobacter, Lactobacillus, Oscillospira, Parabacteroides, Paraprevotellaceae Prevotella, Phascolarctobacterium, Prevotella, RFN20, Ruminococcus, SMB53, Sphaerochaeta, Streptococcus, Treponema and YRC22. A total of 52 significant SNPs were distributed in 17 regions along the following Sus scrofa chromosomes (SSC): SSC3, SSC4, SSC6, SSC7, SSC8, SSC9, SSC10, SSC11, SSC13, SSC14, SSC15, SSC18 and SSCX (Supplementary Table S4). Significant association signals (FDR ≤ 0.1) were found in six out of the 18 GWAS for the following genera: Akkermansia, CF231, Phascolarctobacterium, Prevotella, SMB53 and Streptococcus (Fig. 3 and Table 1). No shared associated regions were found for the abundances of these six genera, albeit some of them belong to the same phyla. CF231 and Prevotella are genera of the Bacteroidetes phylum. Within the Firmicutes phylum, Phascolarctobacterium and SMB53 are members of the Clostridiales order, and Streptococcus is a member of the Lactobacillales order. Hence, our results suggest an association between chromosomal regions along the pig genome and abundance of certain bacteria genera. In the following sections, the candidate genes mapped in the genomic regions associated with the genus relative abundance of Akkermansia, CF231, Phascolarctobacterium, Prevotella, SMB53 and Streptococcus are discussed in detail. The list of candidate genes is summarized in Table 1.
Figure 3

GWAS plot for the relative abundance of the following genera: Akkermansia, CF231, Phascolarctobacterium, Prevotella, SMB53, and Streptococcus. The red lines indicate those SNPs that are below the genome-wide significance threshold (FDR ≤ 0.05), while the blue lines indicate those SNPs that are below genome-wide significance threshold (FDR ≤ 0.1).

Table 1

Significant genomic regions in the pig genome associated with the relative composition of genera and the candidate genes found within.

RegionGenusChr.aPosition in Mb Start - EndNo. SNPsbMost significant SNPEffect (%)p-valueFDRCandidate genes
A1 Akkermansia 30.89–3.043rs81335357; rs812466457.724.04 × 10−64.58 × 10−2CARD11; CHST12
A2 Akkermansia 6101.46–103.461rs8139042925.856.06 × 10−64.58 × 10−2 TGIF1
A3 Akkermansia 7112.61–114.611rs3256041186.561.33 × 10−57.55 × 10−2LGMN; CHGA
A4 Akkermansia 947.53–49.572rs81410866; rs814108818.785.25 × 10−64.58 × 10−2ssc-mir-125b-1; ssc-mir-100; SORL1
A5 Akkermansia 1599.10–101.101rs809826467.943.04 × 10−64.58 × 10−2 SLC39A10
B1 CF231 4119.91–121.911rs3190050517.075.72 × 10−66.48 × 10−2
B2 CF231 X112.48–114.503rs3292292836.344.10 × 10−66.48 × 10−2FGF13; ATP11C
C1 Phascolarctobacterium 965.33–67.331rs812234347.731.25 × 10−65.68 × 10−2SLC45A3; RAB7B; RAB29; NUCKS1; IKBKE; MAPKAPK2
D1 Prevotella 83.81–5.811rs32617485810.887.79 × 10−73.53 × 10−2CYTL1; WFS1; MAN2B2
E1 SMB53 1018.51–22.055rs34413685414.254.92 × 10−91.68 × 10−4CAPN8; CAPN2; SUSD4; DENND1B; PTPRC; ssc-mir-181b-1; ssc-mir-181a-1
E2 SMB53 1053.89–55.891rs3411655638.873.15 × 10−57.14 × 10−2 MALRD1
E3 SMB53 1128.22–33.5014rs8083511010.421.37 × 10−61.47 × 10−2 PCDH17
F1 Streptococcus 923.45–25.663rs3191688516.153.11 × 10−59.41 × 10−2 FAT3
F2 Streptococcus 132.97–5.154rs8131023711.881.20 × 10−59.41 × 10−2PLCL2; GALNT15; RFTN1
F3 Streptococcus 14133.80–135.801rs33744824110.513.46 × 10−69.41 × 10−2CTBP2; UROS
F4 Streptococcus 1525.15–27.879rs3313413798.721.12 × 10−59.41 × 10−2ERCC3; BIN1; MAP3K2
F5 Streptococcus 1844.25–46.251rs3340647497.72.26 × 10−59.41 × 10−2 ssc-mir-196b-1

aChromosome.

bNumber of significant SNPs found in the region (FDR ≤ 0.1).

GWAS plot for the relative abundance of the following genera: Akkermansia, CF231, Phascolarctobacterium, Prevotella, SMB53, and Streptococcus. The red lines indicate those SNPs that are below the genome-wide significance threshold (FDR ≤ 0.05), while the blue lines indicate those SNPs that are below genome-wide significance threshold (FDR ≤ 0.1). Significant genomic regions in the pig genome associated with the relative composition of genera and the candidate genes found within. aChromosome. bNumber of significant SNPs found in the region (FDR ≤ 0.1).

Akkermansia

The relative abundance of Akkermansia, a genus of the Verrucomicrobia phylum, was significantly associated with polymorphisms in five chromosomic regions: SSC3, SSC6, SSC7, SSC9, and SSC15 (Table 1). Within the SSC3 region (1.03–3.04 Mb), two candidate genes have been proposed, caspase recruitment domain family member 11 (CARD11) and carbohydrate sulfotransferase 12 (CHST12). CARD11 is necessary for T helper 17 cells differentiation which are involved in the adaptive immune system and protect the body against extracellular bacteria[39]. The CHST12 gene is required for glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis[40]. Glycosaminoglycans are also called mucopolysaccharides and are often found in the mucin layer together with glycans and sialic acid[41]. The most common species of the Verrucomicrobia phylum found in the gut, Akkermansia muciniphila, colonizes the mucus layer and it is a known mucin degrader[42]. The regulation of host genes related to glycosaminoglycans biosynthesis probably has a direct effect in the occurrence of mucin degrading bacteria. Studying further this candidate gene may help to select a genetic variant that enriches the presence of A. muciniphila, since this species is beneficial to the host by restoring gut barrier function and helps reducing obesity[43]. In SSC6 (102.46 Mb), the only significant SNP (rs81390429, p-value = 6.06 × 10−6) explained a 25% of the variance in the abundance of the Akkermansia genus. The candidate gene found in this SSC6 region, TGIF1 (TGFB induced factor homeobox 1), encodes for a protein that contributes to the adaptive immunity favouring the response of T follicular helper cells[44]. Additionally, two candidate genes were proposed for the Akkermansia spp. abundance in the SSC7 region (112.61–114.61 Mb): CHGA (chromogranin A) and LGMN (legumain). In humans, faecal levels of CHGA were associated with 61 different bacterial species including A. muciniphila, which was negatively associated with CHGA[45]. CHGA plays a role in the innate immunity with its antimicrobial activity against bacteria[46], whereas LGMN is a cysteine protease that also has antimicrobial activity, as well as it is involved in the antigen-presenting process and Toll-like receptors (TLRs) activation[47]. Thus, variations in the CHGA or LGMN genes should be affecting the microbiota composition based on the bacterial resistance to their antimicrobial activity. Inside the SSC9 region (47.53–49.57 Mb), there were three candidate genes, two microRNAs genes, ssc-mir-125b-1 and ssc-mir-100, and the sortilin related receptor 1 (SORL1) gene. Both microRNAs are involved with the adaptive immune system: miR-125b-1 inhibits B cell differentiation[48], while miR-100 inhibits T cell proliferation and differentiation[49]. Therefore, polymorphisms in these miRNAs genes may affect the targeting of these miRNAs or their expression, which might be associated with the abundance of Akkermansia spp. However, the two significant SNPs (rs81410866 and rs81410881, p-value = 5.25 × 10−6) of the SSC9 region were located in intronic regions of the SORL1 gene. SORL1 is an endocytic receptor that might be affecting gut microbiota composition as it has been associated with obesity[50], and pancreatic and biliary tract cancer in humans[51]. Finally, a significant SNP (rs80982646, p-value = 3.04 × 10−6) located at 100.1 Mb in SSC15 was also associated with the relative abundance of Akkermansia spp. In this region, we identified the SLC39A10 (solute carrier family 39 member 10) gene which appears to be a good candidate to modulate the presence of Akkermansia spp., since positively regulates B cell receptor signalling pathway[52]. Hence, in accordance with our results, germ-free mice colonized with A. muciniphila showed an overexpression in genes related with the antigen presentation pathway and B and T cell maturation, implying its possible role as host immune system modulator[53].

CF231

The relative abundance of the CF231 genus (a member of the Paraprevotellaceae family) was associated to genetic variations in two regions along the pig genome in SSC4 and SSCX (Table 1). While no candidate genes were found in SSC4 at 120.91 Mb, the SSCX region (112.48–114.50 Mb) contained the ATPase phospholipid transporting 11 C (ATP11C) and the fibroblast growth factor 13 (FGF13) genes. The ATP11C protein is involved in B cell differentiation past the pro-B cell stage, thus, defects in ATP11C led to a lower number of B cells and an impairment in their differentiation[54]. Changes in the ATP11C gene may cause species-specific tolerance through the adaptive immune system and transport. Additionally, ATP11C is also involved in the metabolism of cholestatic bile acids[55]. Intestinal content of cholesterol has the potential to shape the gut microbiome[56] and the CF231 genus might be affected by the expression of these genes, since bile acids are catabolites of cholesterol. Interestingly, an enrichment of the CF231 genus has been detected in experiments with high fat diet-induced hypercholesterolemic rats treated with cholesterol-lowering drugs[57]. On the other hand, the three significant SNPs of the SSCX region were located in an intron of the other candidate gene, FGF13 (Supplementary Table S4). Although the biological role of the FGF13 gene is not clear, it may be involved in the repair of the intestinal epithelial damage affecting microbiota composition. This function has been reported in another member of its gene family, FGF2 (fibroblast growth factor 2)[58].

Phascolarctobacterium

Six candidate genes found inside the SSC9 region (65.33–67.33 Mb) may be associated with the relative abundance of Phascolarctobacterium spp. (Table 1). Phascolarctobacterium is a Gram-negative genus commonly found in human faeces able to produce short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)[59]. SCFAs are absorbed and serve as a source of energy by colonocytes and peripheral tissue or can be use as substrates for lipogenesis, gluconeogenesis or regulation of cholesterol synthesis in the liver[60]. Interestingly, one of the candidate genes that could be modulating the abundance of Phascolarctobacterium spp. was the SLC45A3 (solute carrier family 45 member 3). SLC45A3 is involved in the positive regulation of fatty acid biosynthetic process[61]. There were also two other candidate genes within SSC9 which encode GTPases that are members of the RAS oncogene family (RAB7B and RAB29). Under the induction of the lipopolysaccharides present in the Gram-negative cell wall, RAB7B promotes the degradation of toll like receptor 4 (TLR4) impairing the innate immune response by reducing the sensitivity of macrophages to lipopolysaccharides signalling[62]. Therefore, RAB7B may play an important role in the development of tolerance to Gram-negative commensal bacteria such as Phascolarctobacterium spp. The other GTPase, RAB29, is involved in bacterial toxin transport and is able to discriminate between Salmonella enterica serovars[63]. The positive regulation of insulin receptor signalling pathway by the NUCKS1 (nuclear casein kinase and cyclin dependent kinase substrate 1) gene[64] located in this SSC9 region may also be modulating the abundance of the Phascolarctobacterium genus, since it has been described an enrichment of this genus in diabetic animal models treated with prebiotics to alleviate glucose intolerance[60]. Additionally, the two remaining candidate genes, IKBKE (inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit epsilon) and MAPKAPK2 (mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2) might be associated with the microbiota composition because of their relationship with the immune system. IKBKE inhibits T cell responses[65] and MAPKAPK2 regulates interleukin 10[66] which is crucial to maintain the gut homeostasis[4].

Prevotella

Studies performed in humans have associated the presence of the Prevotella genus with a high intake of complex fibres in the diet[67]. In our animal material, Prevotella spp. represented 7.03% of the total composition at genus level (Supplementary Table S3). In this case, only the rs326174858 SNP located at 4.81 Mb in SSC8 was significantly associated (p-value = 7.79 × 10−7) with the abundance of Prevotella spp. (Table 1). Three candidate genes were found in this SSC8 region, cytokine like 1 (CYTL1), wolframin ER transmembrane glycoprotein (WFS1), and mannosidase alpha class 2B member 2 (MAN2B2). CYTL1 codes for a protein capable of chemoattracting macrophages and its activity is sensitive to Bordetella pertussis toxin[68]. A defect in the second gene, WFS1, produces insulin insufficiency, causing diabetes via pancreatic β cells failures[69]. Therefore, diabetic individuals would reduce glucose uptake in the gut epithelium[70]. In this sense, glucose might be more available for some bacteria species, producing changes in the overall microbiota composition. In accordance with this hypothesis, the abundance of Prevotella spp. was reduced in diabetic children when compared to healthy ones[71]. The encoded protein of the last candidate gene, MAN2B2, is implicated in the degradation of glycans[72]. Glycans are excreted into the intestine, including those in dietary plants, animal-derived, cartilage and tissue (glycosaminoglycans and N-linked glycans), and endogenous glycans from host mucus (O-linked glycans)[73]. The Prevotella genus contributes to the degradation of mucin and plant-based carbohydrates[74] and, therefore, it seems plausible that variations in a gene involved in the degradation of glycans could modulate the presence of Prevotella spp.

SMB53

The SMB53 genus sequences found in swine compost were closely related with Clostridium glycolicum[75]. The abundance of the SMB53 genus in our pig rectal samples accounted for 1.19% of the total number of annotated reads (Supplementary Table S3), and presented three significant associated regions, two in SSC10 and one in SSC11 (Table 1). The first region of SSC10 (18.51–22.05 Mb) showed the most significant SNP (rs344136854, p-value = 4.92 × 10−9). Seven candidate genes have been identified inside this SSC10 region: calpain 2 (CAPN2) and 8 (CAPN8); sushi domain containing 4 (SUSD4); DENN domain containing 1B (DENND1B); protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type C (PTPRC); ssc-mir-181a-1 and ssc-mir-181b-1. Calpains are a family of proteases that are able to perform various cellular functions depending on changes in intracellular Ca2+ levels[76]. For instance, an increase in Ca2+ in the intestinal porcine endothelial cells due to the Clostridium perfringens β-toxin triggers the calpain activation leading to intestinal cell death[77]. Therefore, polymorphisms in the CAPN2 or CAPN8 genes may confer resistance to Clostridium spp. avoiding endothelial cell death and so, increasing Clostridia abundance in the gut. Two of the significant SNPs of this SSC10 region were located in an intron of the SUSD4 gene, whereas other significant SNP was also located in an intron of the DENND1B gene (Supplementary Table S4). SUSD4, DENND1B and PTPRC are genes related with the immune system: SUSD4 inhibits the complement system[78], DENND1B is a regulator of the T cell receptor signalling[79], and PTPRC is necessary for antigen receptor mediated signalling in lymphocytes[80]. The last two candidate genes in this first SSC10 region were both microRNAs from the miR-181 family. The depletion of miR-181 causes a lack of Natural Killer T cells in the thymus as well as defects in T and B cells development[81]. In the second SSC10 region (54.89 Mb), the only significant SNP (rs341165563, p-value = 3.15 × 10−5) was located in an intron of the MALRD1 (MAM and LDL receptor class A domain containing 1) gene (Supplementary Table S4). This candidate gene is involved in bile acid synthesis regulation and is able to modify the gut microbiota[82]. Khan et al.[57] demonstrated an increase in the relative abundance of the SMB53 genus in hypercholesterolemic rats treated with cholesterol-lowering drugs. Thus, further studies are needed to evaluate the modulation of the SMB53 genus by the MALRD1 negative regulation of bile acid biosynthetic process. Additionally, the SMB53 genus belongs to the Clostridiaceae family. Most members of this family have the capacity to consume gut mucus- and plant-derived saccharides like glucose[83]. Interestingly, recent studies performed by Horie et al.[84] have detected an enrichment of SMB53 in caecum of mice suffering type 2 diabetes, suggesting a possible role of this genus in the disease. The last region, in SSC11 (28.22–33.5 Mb), was comprised of 14 SNPs but, despite being the longest region observed (5.3 Mb), only one candidate gene (protocadherin 17, PCDH17) was proposed. Remarkably, the most significant SNP (rs80835110, p-value = 1.37 × 10−6) was located in an intron of PCDH17 (Supplementary Table S4). PCDH17 may play a role in the colon similar to protocadherin 1 (PCDH1), acting as a physical barrier in the airway epithelial cells[85].

Streptococcus

There are five regions within the pig genome associated to the presence of Streptococcus spp., SSC9, SSC13, SSC14, SSC15, and SSC18 (Table 1). In the SSC9 region (23.45–25.66 Mb), the protein encoded by the FAT atypical cadherin 3 (FAT3) gene may be forming epithelial junctions that can be broken down by Streptococcus spp.[86]. In the SSC13 region (2.97–5.15 Mb), three candidate genes were found: phospholipase C like 2 (PLCL2), polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 5 (GALNT15), and raftlin, lipid raft linker 1 (RFTN1). Four significant SNPs were located in intronic regions of the PLCL2 gene (Supplementary Table S4). PLCL2 increases the thresholds of B cell activation[87] and so, it may modulate the tolerance of the adaptive immune system. On the other hand, GALNT15 belongs to a family of proteins that are able to produce O-linked glycosylation in the mucin[88] and hence, the variations on the GALNT15 gene might affect some mucin dwellers like Streptococcus spp.[89]. Additionally, it is also interesting to highlight a possible link between the RFTN1 gene, involved in the formation and/or maintenance of lipid rafts[90], and the abundance of the Streptococcus genus. The lipid rafts are microdomains located in the membrane surface of the cell that play an important role in cellular signaling and membrane trafficking of T and B lymphocytes[90,91]. Furthermore, lipid rafts are also mediators of innate immune recognition of bacteria[92]. The possible association of RFTN1 with the abundance of Streptococci needs further attention, since some species of Streptococcus are known to hijack these lipid rafts to enter the host cell causing disease[93]. Two candidate genes were found in the SSC14 region (133.8–135.8 Mb): CTBP2 (C-terminal binding protein 2) and UROS (uroporphyrinogen III synthase). The CTBP2 gene was associated in pigs with a susceptibility to develop a bacterial respiratory disease[94]. The UROS gene is involved in the metabolism of porphyrins including heme and uroporphyrinogen III biosynthetic processes[95]. Iron in mammals is incorporated into heme; an essential component of the hemoglobin, which can be acquired by bacterial pathogens as a nutritional iron source. Several Streptococci species that are pathogenic to humans and animals, namely S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae and S. suis, contain cell wall heme-binding proteins that allow them to scavenge heme from host’s hemoglobin as a source of iron acquisition[96,97]. Additionally, the group B Streptococci are able to respire in the presence of heme, enhancing resistance to oxidative stress and improving their survival[98]. Our results suggest that the UROS gene may modulate the presence of Streptococcus spp. making these animals more susceptible to Streptococci colonization. A total of three candidate genes were identified in the SSC15 region (25.15–27.87 Mb): ERCC3 (ERCC excision repair 3, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit), BIN1 (bridging integrator 1), and MAP3K2 (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 2). The ERCC3 gene expression was downregulated in human gastric cells after the infection with Helicobacter pylori[99]. In the same direction as the aforementioned GALNT15 gene, the BIN1 gene might modulate the abundance of mucin dweller bacteria like Streptococcus spp. because of the attenuation of BIN1 favours the intestinal barrier function[100]. The protein encoded by the last candidate gene of this SSC15 region, MAP3K2, activates the toll like receptor 9 (TLR9) that recognizes CpG oligodeoxynucleotide motif in bacteria[101]. Finally, the last significant region (45.25 Mb) in SSC18 contained one microRNA, ssc-mir-196b-1, that was found upregulated in the duodenum of piglets that were resistant to Escherichia coli infection[102].

Conclusion

This report identifies associations between the pig genome and the relative abundance of six genera (Akkermansia, CF231, Phascolarctobacterium, Prevotella, SMB53 and Streptococcus). Most of the candidate genes found in the 17 associated regions of the pig genome encode for proteins that are involved in the host defence system, including the immune system, physical barriers such as the mucin layer or cell junctions, whereas other proteins participate in the metabolism of mucopolysaccharides or bile acids. Our results confirm the importance of host genomics in the modulation of the microbiota composition. However, the associations found in this study could be specific of our population, as the associated polymorphisms found may not be segregating in other populations and the gut microbiota is affected by different factors such as breed, age and diet. Therefore, further studies are warranted in different populations to determine which genetic combinations favour the enrichment of beneficial bacteria, providing the individual with the best intestinal health to avoid the entrance of potential pathogens. Supplementary Legends. Supplementary Information S1. Supplementary Table S1. Supplementary Table S2. Supplementary Table S3. Supplementary Table S4.
  94 in total

1.  Phascolarctobacterium faecium abundant colonization in human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Feifan Wu; Xianfeng Guo; Jiachun Zhang; Min Zhang; Zihao Ou; Yongzheng Peng
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  NUCKS is a positive transcriptional regulator of insulin signaling.

Authors:  Beiying Qiu; Xiaohe Shi; Ee Tsin Wong; Joy Lim; Marco Bezzi; Diana Low; Qiling Zhou; Semih Can Akıncılar; Manikandan Lakshmanan; Hannah L F Swa; Jill Mae Lan Tham; Jayantha Gunaratne; Kenneth K Y Cheng; Wanjin Hong; Karen S L Lam; Masahito Ikawa; Ernesto Guccione; Aimin Xu; Weiping Han; Vinay Tergaonkar
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Sushi domain-containing protein 4 (SUSD4) inhibits complement by disrupting the formation of the classical C3 convertase.

Authors:  Emelie Holmquist; Marcin Okroj; Björn Nodin; Karin Jirström; Anna M Blom
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Genome-wide association studies identify susceptibility loci affecting respiratory disease in Chinese Erhualian pigs under natural conditions.

Authors:  X Huang; T Huang; W Deng; G Yan; H Qiu; Y Huang; S Ke; Y Hou; Y Zhang; Z Zhang; S Fang; L Zhou; B Yang; J Ren; H Ai; L Huang
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Zinc transporter SLC39A10/ZIP10 controls humoral immunity by modulating B-cell receptor signal strength.

Authors:  Shintaro Hojyo; Tomohiro Miyai; Hitomi Fujishiro; Masami Kawamura; Takuwa Yasuda; Atsushi Hijikata; Bum-Ho Bin; Tarou Irié; Junichi Tanaka; Toru Atsumi; Masaaki Murakami; Manabu Nakayama; Osamu Ohara; Seiichiro Himeno; Hisahiro Yoshida; Haruhiko Koseki; Tomokatsu Ikawa; Kenji Mishima; Toshiyuki Fukada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mediators of innate immune recognition of bacteria concentrate in lipid rafts and facilitate lipopolysaccharide-induced cell activation.

Authors:  Martha Triantafilou; Kensuke Miyake; Douglas T Golenbock; Kathy Triantafilou
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Modulation of Mucosal Immune Response, Tolerance, and Proliferation in Mice Colonized by the Mucin-Degrader Akkermansia muciniphila.

Authors:  Muriel Derrien; Peter Van Baarlen; Guido Hooiveld; Elisabeth Norin; Michael Müller; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  ATP11C is critical for the internalization of phosphatidylserine and differentiation of B lymphocytes.

Authors:  Mehmet Yabas; Charis E Teh; Sandra Frankenreiter; Dennis Lal; Carla M Roots; Belinda Whittle; Daniel T Andrews; Yafei Zhang; Narci C Teoh; Jonathan Sprent; Lina E Tze; Edyta M Kucharska; Jennifer Kofler; Geoffrey C Farell; Stefan Bröer; Christopher C Goodnow; Anselm Enders
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 25.606

10.  Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites.

Authors:  Ran Blekhman; Julia K Goodrich; Katherine Huang; Qi Sun; Robert Bukowski; Jordana T Bell; Timothy D Spector; Alon Keinan; Ruth E Ley; Dirk Gevers; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  19 in total

1.  Metagenomics of antimicrobial and heavy metal resistance in the cecal microbiome of fattening pigs raised without antibiotics.

Authors:  Paiboon Tunsagool; Wuttichai Mhuantong; Sithichoke Tangphatsornruang; Nutthee Am-In; Rungtip Chuanchuen; Taradon Luangtongkum; Gunnaporn Suriyaphol
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Correlation between fat accumulation and fecal microbiota in crossbred pigs.

Authors:  Xin Li; Mengyu Li; Jinyi Han; Chuang Liu; Xuelei Han; Kejun Wang; Ruimin Qiao; Xiu-Ling Li; Xin-Jian Li
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.902

3.  The Role of Gut Microbiota in the Skeletal Muscle Development and Fat Deposition in Pigs.

Authors:  Qi Han; Xingguo Huang; Fuyong Yan; Jie Yin; Yingping Xiao
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11

4.  Comparison of cecal microbiota composition in hybrid pigs from two separate three-way crosses.

Authors:  Yuting Yang; Liyan Shen; Huan Gao; Jinming Ran; Xian Li; Hengxin Jiang; Xueyan Li; Zhenhui Cao; Ying Huang; Sumei Zhao; Chunlian Song; Hongbin Pan
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2020-12-01

5.  Gut microbiome mediates host genomic effects on phenotypes: a case study with fat deposition in pigs.

Authors:  Francesco Tiezzi; Justin Fix; Clint Schwab; Caleb Shull; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  Gut eukaryotic communities in pigs: diversity, composition and host genetics contribution.

Authors:  Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Francesc Prenafeta-Boldú; Laura M Zingaretti; Olga Gonzalez-Rodriguez; Antoni Dalmau; Raquel Quintanilla; Maria Ballester
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-05-07

7.  Effect of Spent Mushroom (Cordyceps militaris) on Growth Performance, Immunity, and Intestinal Microflora in Weaning Pigs.

Authors:  Waewaree Boontiam; Chalong Wachirapakorn; Pheeraphong Phaengphairee; Suchat Wattanachai
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine.

Authors:  Matteo Bergamaschi; Francesco Tiezzi; Jeremy Howard; Yi Jian Huang; Kent A Gray; Constantino Schillebeeckx; Nathan P McNulty; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  A glance at the gut microbiota of five experimental animal species through fecal samples.

Authors:  Zhiguang Xiang; Hua Zhu; Bochao Yang; Hang Fan; Jianguo Guo; Jiangning Liu; Qi Kong; Qingfeng Teng; Haiquan Shang; Lei Su; Chuan Qin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A gene co-association network regulating gut microbial communities in a Duroc pig population.

Authors:  Antonio Reverter; Maria Ballester; Pamela A Alexandre; Emilio Mármol-Sánchez; Antoni Dalmau; Raquel Quintanilla; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.