Literature DB >> 31209132

Factors influencing decisions by critical care physicians to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in critically ill adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Alexis F Turgeon1, Kristin Dorrance2, Patrick Archambault2, François Lauzier2, François Lamontagne2, Ryan Zarychanski2, Robert Fowler2, Lynne Moore2, Jacques Lacroix2, Shane English2, Amélie Boutin2, John Muscedere2, Karen E A Burns2, Donald Griesdale2, Lauralyn A McIntyre2, Damon Scales2, Francis Bernard2, Janet Yamada2, Janet E Squires2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most deaths in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury are associated with a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments. We aimed to identify the behavioural determinants that influence recommendations by critical care physicians to consider the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in this population.
METHODS: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study based on the Theoretical Domains Framework of critical care physicians caring for patients with severe traumatic brain injury across Canada. We stratified critical care physicians by regions and used a purposive sampling strategy. We conducted semistructured phone interviews using a piloted and pretested interview guide. We transcribed the interviews verbatim and verified the content for accuracy. We performed the analysis using a 3-step approach: coding, generation of specific beliefs and generation of specific themes.
RESULTS: We recruited 20 critical care physicians across 4 geographic regions. After reaching saturation, we identified 7 core themes across 4 Theoretical Domains Framework domains for factors relevant to the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments. Four factors (i.e., clinical triggers, social triggers, interaction with families and intentions with medical decisions) were identified before the decision is made and 3 were identified during the decision-making process (i.e., considerations, priorities and knowledge needs). We identified multiple themes reflecting internal (n = 18, 8 Theoretical Domains Framework domains) and external (n = 15, 6 Theoretical Domains Framework domains) influences on the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments.
INTERPRETATION: We identified several core themes and domains considered by critical care physicians in Canada in the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Future research should aim at identifying the factors influencing surrogate decision-makers in the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in these patients.
© 2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors or its licensors.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31209132      PMCID: PMC6581526          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.190154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  21 in total

1.  Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies.

Authors:  K J Becker; A B Baxter; W A Cohen; H M Bybee; D L Tirschwell; D W Newell; H R Winn; W T Longstreth
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Ethical controversies at end of life after traumatic brain injury: defining death and organ donation.

Authors:  Michael Souter; Gail Van Norman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Using qualitative research.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2004-12

4.  Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach.

Authors:  S Michie; M Johnston; C Abraham; R Lawton; D Parker; A Walker
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-02

5.  Neurosurgical intensive care improves outcome after severe head injury.

Authors:  P E Wärme; R Bergström; L Persson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit.

Authors:  S A Mayer; S B Kossoff
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-05-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies.

Authors:  Jill J Francis; Marie Johnston; Clare Robertson; Liz Glidewell; Vikki Entwistle; Martin P Eccles; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-12

8.  Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Deborah Cook; Graeme Rocker; John Marshall; Peter Sjokvist; Peter Dodek; Lauren Griffith; Andreas Freitag; Joseph Varon; Christine Bradley; Mitchell Levy; Simon Finfer; Cindy Hamielec; Joseph McMullin; Bruce Weaver; Stephen Walter; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour.

Authors:  Jill J Francis; Charlotte Stockton; Martin P Eccles; Marie Johnston; Brian H Cuthbertson; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Chris Hyde; Alan Tinmouth; Simon J Stanworth
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01-20

10.  A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (the SuDDICU study).

Authors:  B H Cuthbertson; J Francis; M K Campbell; L MacIntyre; I Seppelt; J Grimshaw
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  4 in total

1.  Inter-physician variability in strategies linked to treatment limitations after severe traumatic brain injury; proactivity or wait-and-see.

Authors:  Annette Robertsen; Eirik Helseth; Reidun Førde
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Early discrimination of cognitive motor dissociation from disorders of consciousness: pitfalls and clues.

Authors:  Alessandro Pincherle; Frederic Rossi; Jane Jöhr; Vincent Dunet; Philippe Ryvlin; Mauro Oddo; Nicolas Schiff; Karin Diserens
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Ethics and the 2018 Practice Guideline on Disorders of Consciousness: A Framework for Responsible Implementation.

Authors:  Andrew Peterson; Michael J Young; Joseph J Fins
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign NIH Symposium: Challenging the Future of Research for Coma and Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Jan Claassen; Yama Akbari; Sheila Alexander; Mary Kay Bader; Kathleen Bell; Thomas P Bleck; Melanie Boly; Jeremy Brown; Sherry H-Y Chou; Michael N Diringer; Brian L Edlow; Brandon Foreman; Joseph T Giacino; Olivia Gosseries; Theresa Green; David M Greer; Daniel F Hanley; Jed A Hartings; Raimund Helbok; J Claude Hemphill; H E Hinson; Karen Hirsch; Theresa Human; Michael L James; Nerissa Ko; Daniel Kondziella; Sarah Livesay; Lori K Madden; Shraddha Mainali; Stephan A Mayer; Victoria McCredie; Molly M McNett; Geert Meyfroidt; Martin M Monti; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Santosh Murthy; Paul Nyquist; DaiWai M Olson; J Javier Provencio; Eric Rosenthal; Gisele Sampaio Silva; Simone Sarasso; Nicholas D Schiff; Tarek Sharshar; Lori Shutter; Robert D Stevens; Paul Vespa; Walter Videtta; Amy Wagner; Wendy Ziai; John Whyte; Elizabeth Zink; Jose I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.210

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.