Literature DB >> 19159506

Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour.

Jill J Francis1, Charlotte Stockton, Martin P Eccles, Marie Johnston, Brian H Cuthbertson, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Chris Hyde, Alan Tinmouth, Simon J Stanworth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many theories of behaviour are potentially relevant to predictive and intervention studies but most studies investigate a narrow range of theories. Michie et al. (2005) agreed 12 'theoretical domains' from 33 theories that explain behaviour change. They developed a 'Theoretical Domains Interview' (TDI) for identifying relevant domains for specific clinical behaviours, but the framework has not been used for selecting theories for predictive studies. It was used here to investigate clinicians' transfusion behaviour in intensive care units (ICU). Evidence suggests that red blood cells transfusion could be reduced for some patients without reducing quality of care.
OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify the domains relevant to transfusion practice in ICUs and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), using the TDI. (2) To use the identified domains to select appropriate theories for a study predicting transfusion behaviour.
METHODS: An adapted TDI about managing a patient with borderline haemoglobin by watching and waiting instead of transfusing red blood cells was used to conduct semi-structured, one-to-one interviews with 18 intensive care consultants and neonatologists across the UK.
RESULTS: Relevant theoretical domains were: knowledge, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, social influences, behavioural regulation. Further analysis at the construct level resulted in selection of seven theoretical approaches relevant to this context: Knowledge-Attitude-Behaviour Model, Theory of Planned Behaviour, Social Cognitive Theory, Operant Learning Theory, Control Theory, Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness and Action Planning Approaches.
CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrated, the use of the TDI to identify relevant domains in a complex area of inpatient care. This approach is potentially valuable for selecting theories relevant to predictive studies and resulted in greater breadth of potential explanations than would be achieved if a single theoretical model had been adopted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19159506     DOI: 10.1348/135910708X397025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  100 in total

1.  Managing patients on bisphosphonates: the practice of primary care dentists before and after the publication of national guidance.

Authors:  D L Bonetti; J E Clarkson; P Elouafkaoui; D A Stirling; L Young; A R Templeton
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Is further intervention required to translate caries prevention and management recommendations into practice?

Authors:  P Elouafkaoui; D Bonetti; J Clarkson; D Stirling; L Young; H Cassie
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Implementation of the Recommendations for RBC Transfusions for Critically Ill Children From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative.

Authors:  Katherine M Steffen; Scot T Bateman; Stacey L Valentine; Sara Small; Philip C Spinella; Allan Doctor
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.624

4.  Efficacy of a web-based intervention to improve and sustain knowledge and screening for amblyopia in primary care settings.

Authors:  Wendy L Marsh-Tootle; Gerald McGwin; Connie L Kohler; Robert E Kristofco; Raju V Datla; Terry C Wall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Using the theoretical domains framework to guide the development of a self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury: Results from a national stakeholder advisory group.

Authors:  Sarah E P Munce; Sonya Allin; Dalton L Wolfe; Karen Anzai; Gary Linassi; Vanessa K Noonan; Susan B Jaglal
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Evidence-Based Practice Implementation Within a Theory of Planned Behavior Framework.

Authors:  Alexandra M Burgess; Jaime Chang; Brad J Nakamura; Sonia Izmirian; Kelsie H Okamura
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.505

7.  Using the Behavior Change Wheel to Understand University Students' Prolonged Sitting Time and Identify Potential Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Oscar Castro; Ineke Vergeer; Jason Bennie; Jonathan Cagas; Stuart J H Biddle
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2021-06

8.  Factors influencing decisions by critical care physicians to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in critically ill adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Alexis F Turgeon; Kristin Dorrance; Patrick Archambault; François Lauzier; François Lamontagne; Ryan Zarychanski; Robert Fowler; Lynne Moore; Jacques Lacroix; Shane English; Amélie Boutin; John Muscedere; Karen E A Burns; Donald Griesdale; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Damon Scales; Francis Bernard; Janet Yamada; Janet E Squires
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Women's experiences of hormonal therapy for breast cancer: exploring influences on medication-taking behaviour.

Authors:  Caitriona Cahir; Stephan U Dombrowski; Catherine M Kelly; M John Kennedy; Kathleen Bennett; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Using theories of behaviour to understand transfusion prescribing in three clinical contexts in two countries: development work for an implementation trial.

Authors:  Jill J Francis; Alan Tinmouth; Simon J Stanworth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Marie Johnston; Chris Hyde; Charlotte Stockton; Jamie C Brehaut; Dean Fergusson; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.