Literature DB >> 31208955

A genomics-informed computational biology platform prospectively predicts treatment responses in AML and MDS patients.

Leylah M Drusbosky1, Neeraj Kumar Singh2, Kimberly E Hawkins1, Cesia Salan1, Madeleine Turcotte1, Elizabeth A Wise1, Amy Meacham1, Vindhya Vijay1, Glenda G Anderson3, Charlie C Kim3, Saumya Radhakrishnan2, Yashaswini Ullal2, Anay Talawdekar2, Huzaifa Sikora2, Prashant Nair2, Arati Khanna-Gupta2, Taher Abbasi4, Shireen Vali4, Subharup Guha5, Nosha Farhadfar1, Hemant S Murthy1, Biljana N Horn6, Helen L Leather1, Paul Castillo6, Caitlin Tucker1, Christina Cline1, Leslie Pettiford1, Jatinder K Lamba7, Jan S Moreb1, Randy A Brown1, Maxim Norkin1, John W Hiemenz1, Jack W Hsu1, William B Slayton6, John R Wingard1, Christopher R Cogle1.   

Abstract

Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are generally older and have more comorbidities. Therefore, identifying personalized treatment options for each patient early and accurately is essential. To address this, we developed a computational biology modeling (CBM) and digital drug simulation platform that relies on somatic gene mutations and gene CNVs found in malignant cells of individual patients. Drug treatment simulations based on unique patient-specific disease networks were used to generate treatment predictions. To evaluate the accuracy of the genomics-informed computational platform, we conducted a pilot prospective clinical study (NCT02435550) enrolling confirmed MDS and AML patients. Blinded to the empirically prescribed treatment regimen for each patient, genomic data from 50 evaluable patients were analyzed by CBM to predict patient-specific treatment responses. CBM accurately predicted treatment responses in 55 of 61 (90%) simulations, with 33 of 61 true positives, 22 of 61 true negatives, 3 of 61 false positives, and 3 of 61 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 88%, and an accuracy of 90%. Laboratory validation further confirmed the accuracy of CBM-predicted activated protein networks in 17 of 19 (89%) samples from 11 patients. Somatic mutations in the TET2, IDH1/2, ASXL1, and EZH2 genes were discovered to be highly informative of MDS response to hypomethylating agents. In sum, analyses of patient cancer genomics using the CBM platform can be used to predict precision treatment responses in MDS and AML patients.
© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31208955      PMCID: PMC6595252          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018028316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  26 in total

1.  Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.

Authors:  Luciano G Martelotto; Charlotte Ky Ng; Maria R De Filippo; Yan Zhang; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Raymond S Lim; Ronglai Shen; Larry Norton; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 13.583

2.  Health economic impact of high-dose versus standard-dose cytarabine induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  P L Fedele; S Avery; S Patil; A Spencer; M Haas; A Wei
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.048

Review 3.  The role of targeted therapy in the management of patients with AML.

Authors:  Alexander E Perl
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-11-14

Review 4.  Acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Elihu Estey; Hartmut Döhner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-11-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.

Authors:  Pierre Fenaux; Ghulam J Mufti; Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg; Valeria Santini; Carlo Finelli; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Robert Schoch; Norbert Gattermann; Guillermo Sanz; Alan List; Steven D Gore; John F Seymour; John M Bennett; John Byrd; Jay Backstrom; Linda Zimmerman; David McKenzie; Cl Beach; Lewis R Silverman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  A 3D in vitro model of patient-derived prostate cancer xenograft for controlled interrogation of in vivo tumor-stromal interactions.

Authors:  Eliza L S Fong; Xinhai Wan; Jun Yang; Micaela Morgado; Antonios G Mikos; Daniel A Harrington; Nora M Navone; Mary C Farach-Carson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  TET2 mutations predict response to hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome patients.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar; Allegra Lord; Kristen Stevenson; Michal Bar-Natan; Albert Pérez-Ladaga; Jacques Zaneveld; Hui Wang; Bennett Caughey; Petar Stojanov; Gad Getz; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Rui Chen; Richard M Stone; Donna Neuberg; David P Steensma; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Cost-effectiveness of treatments for high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of first-line hypomethylating agent therapy.

Authors:  Christopher R Cogle; Jesse D Ortendahl; Tanya Gk Bentley; Ayanna M Anene; Scott Megaffin; Thomas J McKearn; Michael E Petrone; Sudipto Mukherjee
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins.

Authors:  Ngak-Leng Sim; Prateek Kumar; Jing Hu; Steven Henikoff; Georg Schneider; Pauline C Ng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Personalization of cancer treatment using predictive simulation.

Authors:  Nicole A Doudican; Ansu Kumar; Neeraj Kumar Singh; Prashant R Nair; Deepak A Lala; Kabya Basu; Anay A Talawdekar; Zeba Sultana; Krishna Kumar Tiwari; Anuj Tyagi; Taher Abbasi; Shireen Vali; Ravi Vij; Mark Fiala; Justin King; MaryAnn Perle; Amitabha Mazumder
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ex vivo drug screening defines novel drug sensitivity patterns for informing personalized therapy in myeloid neoplasms.

Authors:  Michael A Spinner; Alexey Aleshin; Marianne T Santaguida; Steven A Schaffert; James L Zehnder; A Scott Patterson; Christos Gekas; Diane Heiser; Peter L Greenberg
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-06-23

2.  The effect of decitabine-combined minimally myelosuppressive regimen bridged allo-HSCT on the outcomes of pediatric MDS from 10 years' experience of a single center.

Authors:  Junyan Gao; Yixin Hu; Li Gao; Peifang Xiao; Jun Lu; Shaoyan Hu
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.567

Review 3.  Myelodysplastic syndromes: moving towards personalized management.

Authors:  Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Magnus Tobiasson; Peter Greenberg
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  The Mutational Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Predicts Responses and Outcomes in Elderly Patients from the PETHEMA-FLUGAZA Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rosa Ayala; Inmaculada Rapado; Esther Onecha; David Martínez-Cuadrón; Gonzalo Carreño-Tarragona; Juan Miguel Bergua; Susana Vives; Jesus Lorenzo Algarra; Mar Tormo; Pilar Martinez; Josefina Serrano; Pilar Herrera; Fernando Ramos; Olga Salamero; Esperanza Lavilla; Cristina Gil; Jose Luis López Lorenzo; María Belén Vidriales; Jorge Labrador; José Francisco Falantes; María José Sayas; Bruno Paiva; Eva Barragán; Felipe Prosper; Miguel Ángel Sanz; Joaquín Martínez-López; Pau Montesinos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  Precision Medicine in Hematology 2021: Definitions, Tools, Perspectives, and Open Questions.

Authors:  Peter Valent; Alberto Orfao; Stefan Kubicek; Philipp Staber; Torsten Haferlach; Michael Deininger; Karoline Kollmann; Thomas Lion; Irene Virgolini; Georg Winter; Oliver Hantschel; Lukas Kenner; Johannes Zuber; Florian Grebien; Richard Moriggl; Gregor Hoermann; Olivier Hermine; Michael Andreeff; Christoph Bock; Tariq Mughal; Stefan N Constantinescu; Robert Kralovics; Veronika Sexl; Radek Skoda; Giulio Superti-Furga; Ulrich Jäger
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2021-02-17

6.  Analysis of 5-Azacytidine Resistance Models Reveals a Set of Targetable Pathways.

Authors:  Lubomír Minařík; Kristýna Pimková; Juraj Kokavec; Adéla Schaffartziková; Fréderic Vellieux; Vojtěch Kulvait; Lenka Daumová; Nina Dusilková; Anna Jonášová; Karina Savvulidi Vargová; Petra Králová Viziová; Radislav Sedláček; Zuzana Zemanová; Tomáš Stopka
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.