Literature DB >> 33623882

Precision Medicine in Hematology 2021: Definitions, Tools, Perspectives, and Open Questions.

Peter Valent1,2, Alberto Orfao3, Stefan Kubicek4, Philipp Staber1,2, Torsten Haferlach5, Michael Deininger6, Karoline Kollmann7, Thomas Lion2,8, Irene Virgolini9, Georg Winter4, Oliver Hantschel10, Lukas Kenner11, Johannes Zuber12, Florian Grebien13, Richard Moriggl14, Gregor Hoermann2,5, Olivier Hermine15,16, Michael Andreeff17, Christoph Bock4, Tariq Mughal18, Stefan N Constantinescu19, Robert Kralovics4, Veronika Sexl7, Radek Skoda20, Giulio Superti-Furga4, Ulrich Jäger1,2.   

Abstract

During the past few years, our understanding of molecular mechanisms and cellular interactions relevant to malignant blood cell disorders has improved substantially. New insights include a detailed knowledge about disease-initiating exogenous factors, endogenous (genetic, somatic, epigenetic) elicitors or facilitators of disease evolution, and drug actions and interactions that underlie efficacy and adverse event profiles in defined cohorts of patients. As a result, precision medicine and personalized medicine are rapidly growing new disciplines that support the clinician in making the correct diagnosis, in predicting outcomes, and in optimally selecting patients for interventional therapies. In addition, precision medicine tools are greatly facilitating the development of new drugs, therapeutic approaches, and new multiparametric prognostic scoring models. However, although the emerging roles of precision medicine and personalized medicine in hematology and oncology are clearly visible, several questions remain. For example, it remains unknown how precision medicine tools can be implemented in healthcare systems and whether all possible approaches are also affordable. In addition, there is a need to define terminologies and to relate these to specific and context-related tools and strategies in basic and applied science. To discuss these issues, a working conference was organized in September 2019. The outcomes of this conference are summarized herein and include a proposal for definitions, terminologies, and applications of precision and personalized medicine concepts and tools in hematologic neoplasms. We also provide proposals aimed at reducing costs, thereby making these applications affordable in daily practice.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33623882      PMCID: PMC7892291          DOI: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemasphere        ISSN: 2572-9241


  75 in total

1.  Paul Ehrlich.

Authors:  G LAPAGE
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1952-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Personalized medicine: something old, something new.

Authors:  Fintan R Steele
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Between hype and hope: What is really at stake with personalized medicine?

Authors:  Camille Abettan
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-09

Review 4.  Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma: Genetic Classification and Its Implications for Prognosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer L Crombie; Philippe Armand
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 5.  The Emerging Potential for Network Analysis to Inform Precision Cancer Medicine.

Authors:  Kivilcim Ozturk; Michelle Dow; Daniel E Carlin; Rafael Bejar; Hannah Carter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Standard treatment of Ph+ CML in 2010: how, when and where not to use what BCR/ABL1 kinase inhibitor?

Authors:  Peter Valent
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.686

7.  How personalised medicine will transform healthcare by 2030: the ICPerMed vision.

Authors:  Astrid M Vicente; Wolfgang Ballensiefen; Jan-Ingvar Jönsson
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Comparative efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukaemia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mariana M Fachi; Fernanda S Tonin; Leticia P Leonart; Karina S Aguiar; Luana Lenzi; Bonald C Figueiredo; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Chemical proteomic profiles of the BCR-ABL inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib reveal novel kinase and nonkinase targets.

Authors:  Uwe Rix; Oliver Hantschel; Gerhard Dürnberger; Lily L Remsing Rix; Melanie Planyavsky; Nora V Fernbach; Ines Kaupe; Keiryn L Bennett; Peter Valent; Jacques Colinge; Thomas Köcher; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Quantitative scoring of differential drug sensitivity for individually optimized anticancer therapies.

Authors:  Bhagwan Yadav; Tea Pemovska; Agnieszka Szwajda; Evgeny Kulesskiy; Mika Kontro; Riikka Karjalainen; Muntasir Mamun Majumder; Disha Malani; Astrid Murumägi; Jonathan Knowles; Kimmo Porkka; Caroline Heckman; Olli Kallioniemi; Krister Wennerberg; Tero Aittokallio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ex Vivo Chemosensitivity Profiling of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Its Correlation With Clinical Response and Outcome to Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Min Ji; Jin-Yan Zhao; Hua-Feng Wang; Chong-Wu Wang; Wei Li; Jing-Jing Ye; Fei Lu; Li-Hui Lin; Yan-Ting Gao; Jie Jin; Li Li; Chun-Yan Ji; Joan Ballesteros; Hong-Hu Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.