Literature DB >> 24863325

Health economic impact of high-dose versus standard-dose cytarabine induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.

P L Fedele1, S Avery, S Patil, A Spencer, M Haas, A Wei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is one of the most resource-intensive cancer therapies delivered in hospitals. AIMS: To assess the health resource impact of different chemotherapy approaches for AML commonly used in Australia.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken in 63 patients aged 18-55 years with AML given induction with either 7 + 3 (cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) days 1-7 and idarubicin 12 mg/m(2) days 1-3) or HiDAC-3 (high-dose cytarabine 3 g/m(2) twice daily days 1, 3, 5 and 7 and idarubicin 12 mg/m(2) days 1-3) chemotherapy. Average costs of hospitalisation, pathology, radiology, chemotherapy and ancillary drugs were calculated and compared with current Victorian casemix funding. Two consolidation approaches, HiDAC (cytarabine 3 g/m(2) twice daily days 1, 3, 5 and 7) × either three or four cycles (following 7 + 3) and IcE (idarubicin 12,mg/m(2) days 1-2, cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) × 5 days and etoposide 75 mg/m(2) × 5 days) × 2 cycles (following HiDAC-3) were modelled, using a policy of discharge following completion of chemotherapy with outpatient monitoring.
RESULTS: The cost (in AUD) of induction was similar between 7 + 3 ($58,037) and HiDAC-3 ($56,902), with bed day costs accounting for 61-62% of the total expense. Blood bank costs ranked second, accounting for 15%. Accumulated costs for HiDAC consolidation were $44,289 for a three-cycle protocol and $59,052 for four cycles ($14,763 per cycle) versus $31,456 for two cycles of IcE consolidation ($15,728 per cycle). Overall, the classical 7 + 3 → HiDAC approach ($102,326/$117,089 for three or four consolidation cycles) incurs a greater cost than a HiDAC-3 → IcE × 2 approach ($88,358). For patients requiring complete hospitalisation until neutrophil recovery, the estimated costs of treatment will be even higher, ranging between $122,282 for HiDAC-3 → IcE × 2, $153,212 for 7 + 3 → HiDAC × 3 and $184,937 for 7 + 3 → HiDAC × 4. State-based casemix funding for non-complicated AML therapy is currently $74,013 for 7 + 3 → HiDAC × 4, $64,177 for 7 + 3 → HiDAC × 3 and $54,340 for HiDAC-3 → IcE × 2 based on outpatient recovery after consolidation chemotherapy. These calculations do not take into account additional resource implications associated with complications of consolidation chemotherapy or reinduction for treatment failure.
CONCLUSION: Regimens minimising the total number of chemotherapy cycles may represent the most efficient use of limited health resources for the treatment of AML.
© 2014 The Authors; Internal Medicine Journal © 2014 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HiDAC; acute myeloid leukaemia; cost effectiveness; cytarabine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24863325     DOI: 10.1111/imj.12478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med J        ISSN: 1444-0903            Impact factor:   2.048


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of in-patient costs for children treated on the AAML0531 clinical trial: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Kelly D Getz; Yimei Li; Todd A Alonzo; Matthew Hall; Robert B Gerbing; Lillian Sung; Yuan-Shung Huang; Staci Arnold; Alix E Seif; Tamara P Miller; Rochelle Bagatell; Brian T Fisher; Peter C Adamson; Alan Gamis; Ron Keren; Richard Aplenc
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 2.  Trends in Clinical Benefits and Costs of Novel Therapeutics in AML: at What Price Does Progress Come?

Authors:  Jennifer E Vaughn; Veena Shankaran; Roland B Walter
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  A genomics-informed computational biology platform prospectively predicts treatment responses in AML and MDS patients.

Authors:  Leylah M Drusbosky; Neeraj Kumar Singh; Kimberly E Hawkins; Cesia Salan; Madeleine Turcotte; Elizabeth A Wise; Amy Meacham; Vindhya Vijay; Glenda G Anderson; Charlie C Kim; Saumya Radhakrishnan; Yashaswini Ullal; Anay Talawdekar; Huzaifa Sikora; Prashant Nair; Arati Khanna-Gupta; Taher Abbasi; Shireen Vali; Subharup Guha; Nosha Farhadfar; Hemant S Murthy; Biljana N Horn; Helen L Leather; Paul Castillo; Caitlin Tucker; Christina Cline; Leslie Pettiford; Jatinder K Lamba; Jan S Moreb; Randy A Brown; Maxim Norkin; John W Hiemenz; Jack W Hsu; William B Slayton; John R Wingard; Christopher R Cogle
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-06-25

4.  Comparison of Hospital Length of Stay and Supportive Care Utilization Between Patients Treated with CPX-351 and 7+3 for Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes.

Authors:  Kwanza Price; Zhun Cao; Craig Lipkin; Deb Profant; Scott Robinson
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-01-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.