| Literature DB >> 31208001 |
Eng Guan Chua1, Mun Fai Loke2,3, Selva Perumal Gunaletchumy4, Han Ming Gan5,6, Kavitha Thevakumar7, Chin Yen Tay8, Sylvia Young9, Than Than Aye10, Win Win Maw11, Mya Mya Aye12, Alex Hwong-Ruey Leow13, Ahmad Najib Azmi14, Sri Ganesh Kalimuthu15, Haji Mohd Akmal Bin Dato Dahlan16, Khean Lee Goh17, Jamuna Vadivelu18.
Abstract
The present study explored the differences in gastric microbiome between three distinct populations of Southeast Asia. These include the isolated Orang Asli population and modern Malaysians, as well as patients from Myanmar, the least developed country in the region. All 79 subjects recruited in this study had Helicobacter pylori infection. Based on alpha diversity analysis, Orang Asli had the richest and most diverse gastric microbiome, followed by Myanmar and modern Malaysian groups. Beta diversity analysis revealed significant separation of samples between different populations. These observations are likely to be associated with the level of modernization of each population. Our data further suggested increased bacterial species richness and diversity of the gastric microbiome in individuals who were less modernized, particularly in the Orang Asli group, could suppress the growth of H. pylori. In addition, there were significant variations in the gastric microbiome between modern Malaysians with different types of gastric diseases. Notably, Cutibacterium acnes was present at significantly greater abundance level in patients with non-ulcerative dyspepsia than those with peptic-ulcer diagnosis. This suggests that C. acnes may also play a role in gastritis besides H. pylori, which merits further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; Helicobacter pylori; Malaysian; Myanmar; Orang Asli; beta diversity; gastric disease; microbiome
Year: 2019 PMID: 31208001 PMCID: PMC6616485 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7060174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Urea breath test results and demographics of Orang Asli subjects.
| Origin |
| Positive | Indeterminate | Negative | Mean Age (years) | Married (%) | Female (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temiar | 69 | 3 | 49 | 17 | 33 (16–80) | 85% | 67% |
| Temuan | 56 | 3 | 32 | 21 | 29 (15–56) | 69% | 51% |
| Semai | 45 | 11 | 19 | 15 | 32 (14–60) | 83% | 77% |
| Others (Mah Meri, Iban, Jah Hut and Jakun) | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 39 (27–53) | 43% | 57% |
Demographics and clinical findings of study subjects who underwent endoscopic examination.
| Country | Ethnic Group | N | Mean Age (years) | NUD | PUD | GC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | Orang Asli (Semai) | 3 | 33.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Orang Asli (Temiar) | 7 | 32.3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Chinese | 16 | 47.9 | 7 | 6 | 3 | |
| Indian | 10 | 34.6 | 8 | 1 | 1 | |
| Malay | 6 | 37.5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Myanmar | Burmese | 22 | 48.3 | 5 | 11 | 6 |
| Rakhine | 5 | 47.4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| Karen | 3 | 36.7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | |
| Chin | 2 | 41.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Mon | 2 | 31.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Others (Kachin, Paoh) | 3 | 61.7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GC: Gastric cancer; NUD: Non-ulcerative dyspepsia; PUD: Peptic ulcer disease.
Figure 1Bacterial phyla and genera compositions in Orang Asli, Myanmar and modern Malaysian non-ulcerative dyspepsia (NUD) patients. (A) Mean relative abundances of the five most predominant bacterial phyla in each population. (B) Mean relative abundances of the five most predominant bacterial genera in each cohort.
Figure 2Alpha diversity analysis between Orang Asli, Myanmar and modern Malaysian groups diagnosed with NUD. (A) Alpha diversity estimation based on species richness index. (B) Alpha diversity estimation based on Shannon diversity index.
Figure 3Beta diversity analysis between Orang Asli, Myanmar and modern Malaysian groups diagnosed with NUD. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot based on Jaccard index (R = 0.75, p < 0.001).
List of bacterial genera abundances that significantly differed between Orang Asli, Myanmar and modern Malaysian groups diagnosed with NUD.
| Genus | Median Relative Abundance (%) | Adjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OA | MYA | MM | OA vs. MYA | OA vs. MM | MYA vs. MM | |
|
| 0.69 | 0 | 0 | 0.005 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 0.77 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 1.24 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 2.09 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 1.86 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.004 | 0.001 | N.S |
|
| 0.72 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | 0.001 | N.S |
|
| 3.11 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 7.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 2.07 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 0.84 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 3.1 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 0.63 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | 0.001 | N.S |
|
| 2.96 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 2.18 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 3.96 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 0.55 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 1.49 | 0 | 0 | 0.004 | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 0.01 | 0.49 | 71.69 | N.S | 0.001 | 0.01 |
|
| 0.88 | 0 | 0.42 | 0.005 | N.S | 0.001 |
|
| 0.62 | 0 | 0 | 0.005 | N.S | N.S |
|
| 0.36 | 11.06 | 1.89 | 0.007 | N.S | N.S |
|
| 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.59 | N.S | 0.004 | N.S |
|
| 0.1 | 0.41 | 1.6 | N.S | 0.001 | N.S |
|
| 0.29 | 0 | 0 | N.S | 0.01 | N.S |
|
| 1.85 | 0 | 0 | N.S | <0.001 | N.S |
|
| 0.71 | 0 | 0 | N.S | 0.006 | N.S |
|
| 0 | 0.44 | 0.33 | N.S | 0.006 | N.S |
|
| 0 | 0.59 | 0 | N.S | N.S | 0.004 |
OA: Orang Asli; MYA: Myanmars; MM: Modern Malaysians; N.S: Not significant.
Figure 4Beta diversity analysis between modern Malaysians with gastric cancer, peptic ulcer disease and non-ulcerative dyspepsia. PCoA plot based on Jaccard index (R = 0.4, p = 0.002).
Figure 5Bacterial phyla and genera compositions in modern Malaysians with gastric cancer, peptic ulcer disease and non-ulcerative dyspepsia. (A) Mean relative abundances of the five most dominating bacterial phyla in each disease group. (B) Mean relative abundances of the five most dominating bacterial genera in each disease group.