Literature DB >> 31205977

Fully automated prostate whole gland and central gland segmentation on MRI using holistically nested networks with short connections.

Ruida Cheng1, Nathan Lay2, Holger R Roth2, Baris Turkbey3, Dakai Jin2, William Gandler1, Evan S McCreedy1, Tom Pohida4, Peter Pinto5, Peter Choyke3, Matthew J McAuliffe1, Ronald M Summers2.   

Abstract

Accurate and automated prostate whole gland and central gland segmentations on MR images are essential for aiding any prostate cancer diagnosis system. Our work presents a 2-D orthogonal deep learning method to automatically segment the whole prostate and central gland from T2-weighted axial-only MR images. The proposed method can generate high-density 3-D surfaces from low-resolution ( z axis) MR images. In the past, most methods have focused on axial images alone, e.g., 2-D based segmentation of the prostate from each 2-D slice. Those methods suffer the problems of over-segmenting or under-segmenting the prostate at apex and base, which adds a major contribution for errors. The proposed method leverages the orthogonal context to effectively reduce the apex and base segmentation ambiguities. It also overcomes jittering or stair-step surface artifacts when constructing a 3-D surface from 2-D segmentation or direct 3-D segmentation approaches, such as 3-D U-Net. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves 92.4 % ± 3 % Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for prostate and DSC of 90.1 % ± 4.6 % for central gland without trimming any ending contours at apex and base. The experiments illustrate the feasibility and robustness of the 2-D-based holistically nested networks with short connections method for MR prostate and central gland segmentation. The proposed method achieves segmentation results on par with the current literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; deep learning; holistically nested networks; prostate; segmentation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31205977      PMCID: PMC6551111          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.2.024007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  10 in total

1.  Multifeature landmark-free active appearance models: application to prostate MRI segmentation.

Authors:  Robert Toth; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Automated prostate segmentation in whole-body MRI scans for epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Mohamad Habes; Thilo Schiller; Christian Rosenberg; Martin Burchardt; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Automatic model-based segmentation of the heart in CT images.

Authors:  Olivier Ecabert; Jochen Peters; Hauke Schramm; Cristian Lorenz; Jens von Berg; Matthew J Walker; Mani Vembar; Mark E Olszewski; Krishna Subramanyan; Guy Lavi; Jürgen Weese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information.

Authors:  Stefan Klein; Uulke A van der Heide; Irene M Lips; Marco van Vulpen; Marius Staring; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Deeply Supervised Salient Object Detection with Short Connections.

Authors:  Qibin Hou; Ming-Ming Cheng; Xiaowei Hu; Ali Borji; Zhuowen Tu; Philip H S Torr
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  Automatic magnetic resonance prostate segmentation by deep learning with holistically nested networks.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Holger R Roth; Nathan Lay; Le Lu; Baris Turkbey; William Gandler; Evan S McCreedy; Tom Pohida; Peter A Pinto; Peter Choyke; Matthew J McAuliffe; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-21

7.  Spatial aggregation of holistically-nested convolutional neural networks for automated pancreas localization and segmentation.

Authors:  Holger R Roth; Le Lu; Nathan Lay; Adam P Harrison; Amal Farag; Andrew Sohn; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Representation learning: a unified deep learning framework for automatic prostate MR segmentation.

Authors:  Shu Liao; Yaozong Gao; Aytekin Oto; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

10.  Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool.

Authors:  Abdel Aziz Taha; Allan Hanbury
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 1.930

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Automatic quadriceps and patellae segmentation of MRI with cascaded U2 -Net and SASSNet deep learning model.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Marion Crouzier; François Hug; Kylie Tucker; Paul Juneau; Evan McCreedy; William Gandler; Matthew J McAuliffe; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 2.  A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Yash S Khandwala; Sulaiman Vesal; Wei Shao; Qianye Yang; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Christian A Kunder; James D Brooks; Yipeng Hu; Mirabela Rusu; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-10

3.  Harnessing clinical annotations to improve deep learning performance in prostate segmentation.

Authors:  Karthik V Sarma; Alex G Raman; Nikhil J Dhinagar; Alan M Priester; Stephanie Harmon; Thomas Sanford; Sherif Mehralivand; Baris Turkbey; Leonard S Marks; Steven S Raman; William Speier; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.