Literature DB >> 31205655

British society of gastroenterology Endoscopy Quality Improvement Programme (EQIP): overview and progress.

Colin J Rees1,2, Sara Koo2, John Anderson3, Mark McAlindon4, Andrew M Veitch5, Allan John Morris6, Pradeep Bhandari7, James E East8, George Webster9, Kofi W Oppong10, Ian D Penman11.   

Abstract

High quality gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy improves patient care. Raising standards in endoscopy improves diagnostic accuracy, management of pathology and ultimately improves outcomes. Historical identification of significant variation in colonoscopy quality led to the development of the Joint Advisory Group (JAG) on GI Endoscopy, the Global Rating Scale (GRS), JAG Endoscopy Training System (JETS) training and certification. These measures led to major improvements in UK endoscopy but significant variation in practice still exists. To improve quality further the British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Quality Improvement (EQIP) has been established with the aim of raising quality and reducing variation in the quality of UK endoscopy. A multifaceted approach to quality improvement (QI) will be undertaken and is described in this manuscript. Upper GI EQIP will support adoption of standards alongside regional upskilling courses. Lower GI EQIP will focus on supporting endoscopists to achieve current standards alongside approaches to reducing postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography EQIP will adopt a regional approach of using local data to support network-based QI. Newer areas of endoscopy practice such as small bowel endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound will focus on identifying key performance indicators as well as standardising training and accreditation pathways. EQIP will also support QI in management of GI bleeding as well as standardising the approach to new techniques and technologies. Where evidence is lacking, approaches to gather new evidence and support the translation into clinical practice will be supported.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic procedures; endoscopy; gastrointestinal bleeding

Year:  2019        PMID: 31205655      PMCID: PMC6540284          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  24 in total

1.  The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK.

Authors:  Daniel R Gavin; Roland M Valori; John T Anderson; Mark T Donnelly; J Graham Williams; Edwin T Swarbrick
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Achieving high quality colonoscopy: using graphical representation to measure performance and reset standards.

Authors:  P T Rajasekhar; M D Rutter; M G Bramble; D W Wilson; J E East; J R Greenaway; B P Saunders; T J W Lee; R Barton; A P S Hungin; C J Rees
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Thomas J W Lee; Matthew D Rutter; Roger G Blanks; Sue M Moss; Andrew F Goddard; Andrew Chilton; Claire Nickerson; Richard J Q McNally; Julietta Patnick; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Robert L Barclay; Joseph J Vicari; Andrea S Doughty; John F Johanson; Roger L Greenlaw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.

Authors:  T J W Lee; R G Blanks; C J Rees; K C Wright; C Nickerson; S M Moss; A Chilton; A F Goddard; J Patnick; R J Q McNally; M D Rutter
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Patient satisfaction with the endoscopy experience and willingness to return in a central Canadian health region.

Authors:  Russell Loftus; Zoann Nugent; Lesley A Graff; Frederick Schumacher; Charles N Bernstein; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Should bowel preparation, antifoaming agents, or prokinetics be used before video capsule endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vikram S Kotwal; Bashar M Attar; Saurabh Gupta; Rajender Agarwal
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.566

10.  Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Marco Pennazio; Renato Santucci; Emanuele Rondonotti; Carla Abbiati; Gizela Beccari; Francesco P Rossini; Roberto De Franchis
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) framework for managing underperformance in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Srivathsan Ravindran; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Keith Siau; Geoff V Smith; Mark Coleman; Colin Rees; Chris Healey
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-05

2.  Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Emma C Robbins; Kevin Pack; Iain Stenson; Paula L Kirby; Bhavita Patel; Matthew D Rutter; Andrew M Veitch; Brian P Saunders; Matthew Little; Alastair Gray; Stephen W Duffy; Kate Wooldrage
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.106

3.  Heterogeneity in colorectal cancer incidence among people recommended 3-yearly surveillance post-polypectomy: a validation study.

Authors:  Emma C Robbins; Kate Wooldrage; Iain Stenson; Kevin Pack; Stephen Duffy; David Weller; Theodore Levin; Carol Conell; Suzanne Wright; Claire Nickerson; Jessica Martin; Amanda J Cross
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Causes and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Abdulelah Almutairdi; Ibrahim M Alruzug; Thamer A Aldarsouny; Toufic Semaan; Manhal K Aldaher; Adnan AlMustafa; Nahla Azzam; Faisal Batwa; Badr Albawardy; Abdulrahman Aljebreen
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.