Literature DB >> 34970427

Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) framework for managing underperformance in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Srivathsan Ravindran1,2, Siwan Thomas-Gibson3,4, Keith Siau5, Geoff V Smith1,6, Mark Coleman1,7, Colin Rees8, Chris Healey1,9.   

Abstract

Underperformance can be defined as performance which persistently falls below a desired minimum standard considered acceptable for patient care. Within gastrointestinal endoscopy, underperformance may be multifactorial, related to an individual's knowledge, skills, attitudes, health or external factors. If left unchecked, underperformance has the potential to impact on care and ultimately patient safety. Managing underperformance should be a key attribute of high-quality endoscopy service, as recognised in the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) accreditation process. However, it is recognised that not all services have robust mechanisms to do this. This article provides the JAG position on managing underperformance in endoscopy, defined through a practical framework. This follows a stepwise process of detecting underperformance, verification, identification of additional causative factors, providing support and reassessment. Detection and verification of issues may require use of multiple evidence sources, including performance data, feedback and appraisal reports. Where technical underperformance is identified, this should be risk stratified by potential risk to patient safety. Support should be tailored to each individual case based on the type of underperformance detected, any causative factors with an action plan developed. Support may include coaching, mentoring, training and upskilling. Wider support from the medical director's office or external services may also be required. Monitoring and reassessment is a crucial part of the overall process. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34970427      PMCID: PMC8666862          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  7 in total

Review 1.  British society of gastroenterology Endoscopy Quality Improvement Programme (EQIP): overview and progress.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Sara Koo; John Anderson; Mark McAlindon; Andrew M Veitch; Allan John Morris; Pradeep Bhandari; James E East; George Webster; Kofi W Oppong; Ian D Penman
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-18

2.  Managing underperformance in endoscopy: a pragmatic approach.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Michael J Bourke; Douglas Rex; Paul Fockens; Michal F Kaminski; Neil Haslam; Martin Walls
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Do team processes really have an effect on clinical performance? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  J Schmutz; T Manser
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Siwan Thomas Gibson; Matt D Rutter; Phil Baragwanath; Rupert Pullan; Mark Feeney; Neil Haslam
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS).

Authors:  Sabina Beg; Krish Ragunath; Andrew Wyman; Matthew Banks; Nigel Trudgill; D Mark Pritchard; Stuart Riley; John Anderson; Helen Griffiths; Pradeep Bhandari; Phillip Kaye; Andrew Veitch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Characteristics of healthcare organisations struggling to improve quality: results from a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Valerie M Vaughn; Sanjay Saint; Sarah L Krein; Jane H Forman; Jennifer Meddings; Jessica Ameling; Suzanne Winter; Whitney Townsend; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Teamworking in endoscopy: a human factors toolkit for the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Srivathsan Ravindran; Manmeet Matharoo; Mark Coleman; Sarah Marshall; Chris Healey; Ian Penman; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 9.776

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  JAG consensus statements for training and certification in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Keith Siau; Ian L P Beales; Adam Haycock; Durayd Alzoubaidi; Rachael Follows; Rehan Haidry; Jayan Mannath; Susan McConnell; Aravinth Murugananthan; Srivathsan Ravindran; Stuart A Riley; R N Williams; Nigel John Trudgill; Andrew M Veitch
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-24

2.  Quality indicators of colonoscopy care: a qualitative study from the perspectives of colonoscopy participants and nurses.

Authors:  Wenwen Cai; Xingxing Zhang; Yanxia Luo; Minshan Ye; Yu Guo; Weiqing Ruan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jamie Catlow; Rashmi Bhardwaj-Gosling; Linda Sharp; Matthew David Rutter; Falko F Sniehotta
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 7.418

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.