Literature DB >> 31201809

Pain and activity after vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.

Matthew D Barber1, Linda Brubaker2, Ingrid Nygaard3, Clifford Y Wai4, Keisha Y Dyer5, David Ellington6, Amaanti Sridhar7, Marie G Gantz7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about short- and long-term pain and functional activity after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the study were to describe postoperative pain and functional activity after transvaginal native tissue reconstructive surgery with apical suspension and retropubic synthetic midurethral sling and to compare these outcomes between patients receiving 2 common transvaginal prolapse repairs, uterosacral ligament, and sacrospinous ligament vaginal vault suspension. STUDY
DESIGN: This planned secondary analysis of a 2 × 2 factorial randomized trial included 374 women randomized to receive uterosacral (n = 188) or sacrospinous (n = 186) vaginal vault suspension to treat both stages 2-4 apical vaginal prolapse and stress urinary incontinence between 2008 and 2013 at 9 medical centers. Participants were also randomized to receive perioperative pelvic muscle therapy or usual care. All patients received transvaginal native tissue repairs and a midurethral sling. Participants completed the Surgical Pain Scales (0-10 numeric rating scales; higher scores = greater pain) and Activity Assessment Scale (0-100; higher score = higher activity) prior to surgery and at 2 weeks, 4-6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey was completed at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery; the bodily pain, physical functioning, and role-physical subscales were used for this analysis (higher scores = less disability). Self-reported pain medication use was also collected.
RESULTS: Before surgery, average pain at rest and during normal activity were (adjusted mean ± SE) 2.24 ± 0.23 and 2.76 ± 0.25; both increased slightly from baseline at 2 weeks (+0.65, P = .004, and +0.74, P = .007, respectively) and then decreased below baseline at 3 months (-0.87 and -1.14, respectively, P < .001), with no differences between surgical groups. Pain during exercise/strenuous activity and worst pain decreased below baseline levels at 4-6 weeks (-1.26, P = .014, and -0.95, P = .002) and 3 months (-1.97 and -1.50, P < .001) without differences between surgical groups. Functional activity as measured by the Activity Assessment Scale improved from baseline at 4-6 weeks (+9.24, P < .001) and 3 months (+13.79, P < .001). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey Bodily Pain, Physical Functioning, and Role-Physical Scales demonstrated significant improvements from baseline at 6, 12, and 24 months (24 months: +5.62, +5.79, and +4.72, respectively, P < .001 for each) with no differences between groups. Use of narcotic pain medications was reported by 14.3% of participants prior to surgery and 53.7% at 2 and 26.1% at 4-6 weeks postoperatively; thereafter use was similar to baseline rates until 24 months when it decreased to 6.8%. Use of nonnarcotic pain medication was reported by 48.1% of participants prior to surgery, 68.7% at 2 weeks, and similar to baseline at 3 months; thereafter use dropped steadily to 26.6% at 2 years. Uterosacral ligament suspension resulted in less new or worsening buttock pain than sacrospinous suspension at 4-6 weeks postoperatively (4.6% vs 10.5%, P = .043) but no difference in groin or thigh pain.
CONCLUSION: Pain and functional activity improve for up to 2 years after native tissue reconstructive surgery with uterosacral or sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension and midurethral sling for stages 2-4 pelvic organ prolapse. On average, immediate postoperative pain is low and improves to below baseline levels by 4-6 weeks.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional activity; pelvic floor disorders; pelvic organ prolapse; postoperative pain; sacrospinous ligament fixation; stress urinary incontinence; uterosacral ligament suspension; vaginal reconstructive surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31201809      PMCID: PMC7250460          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  22 in total

1.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Reply to: Predictors of Opioid Administration in the Acute Postoperative Period.

Authors:  Marcella G Willis-Gray; Katherine E Husk; Taylor J Brueseke; Jennifer M Wu; Alexis A Dieter
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  Outpatient Narcotic Use After Minimally Invasive Urogynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Angela S Kelley; Dee E Fenner; Mitchell B Berger
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

5.  Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Kathryn L Burgio; Holly E Richter; Ingrid Nygaard; Alison C Weidner; Shawn A Menefee; Emily S Lukacz; Peggy Norton; Joseph Schaffer; John N Nguyen; Diane Borello-France; Patricia S Goode; Sharon Jakus-Waldman; Cathie Spino; Lauren Klein Warren; Marie G Gantz; Susan F Meikle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Recognition and management of nerve entrapment pain after uterosacral ligament suspension.

Authors:  Christopher P Chung; Thomas J Kuehl; Wilma I Larsen; Paul M Yandell; Bob L Shull
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Postoperative pain and perceptions of recuperation after suture- and mesh-based apical sacrospinous ligament suspension.

Authors:  Carolyn Botros; Juraj Letko; Adam Gafni-Kane; Sylvia Botros; Svjetlana Lozo; Peter Sand
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Changes in physical activity after abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Victoria L Handa; Linda Brubaker; Diane Borello-France; John Wei; Ellen Wells; Patricia Goode
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Quality of life after surgery for genital prolapse in elderly women: obliterative and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Cindy L Amundsen; Marie F R Paraiso; Alison C Weidner; Audrey Romero; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.