| Literature DB >> 31198419 |
Li Gujing1, He Hui1, Li Xin1, Zhang Lirong2, Yao Yutong3, Ye Guofeng1, Lu Jing1, Zhou Shulin4, Yang Lei5, Luo Cheng1, Yao Dezhong1.
Abstract
Dance and music are expressive art forms. Previous behavioural studies have reported that dancers/musicians show a better sensorimotor ability and emotional representation of others. However, the neural mechanism behind this phenomenon is not completely understood. Recently, intensive researches have identified that the insula is highly enrolled in the empathic process. Thus, to expand the knowledge of insular function associated with empathy under the dance/music training background, we mapped the insular network and its associated brain regions in 21 dancers, 20 musicians, and 24 healthy controls using resting-state functional connectivity (FC) analysis. Whole brain voxel-based analysis was performed using seeds from the posterior insula (PI), the ventral anterior insula (vAI), and the dorsal anterior insula (dAI). The training effects of dance and music on insular subnetworks were then evaluated using one-way analysis of variance ANOVA. Increased insular FC with those seeds was found in dancers/musicians, including PI and anterior cingulated cortex (ACC), vAI and middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and middle cingulated cortex (MCC), and dAI and ACC and MTG. In addition, significant associations were found between discrepant insular FC patterns and empathy scores in dancers and musicians. These results indicated that dance/music training might enhance insular subnetwork function, which would facilitate integration of intero/exteroceptive information and result in better affective sensitivity. Those changes might finally facilitate the subjects' empathic ability.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31198419 PMCID: PMC6526550 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9693109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Participant demographic information.
| Dancer group | Musician group | Control group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 7/14 | 7/13 | 7/17 | 0.91a |
| Age (mean ± SD years) | 18.71 ± 1.90 | 19.05 ± 1.19 | 19.58 ± 1.58 | 0.19b |
| Education (years) | 12.48 ± 1.63 | 12.50 ± 1.19 | 13.03 ± 1.42 | 0.21b |
| FD | 0.1021 ± 0.0492 | 0.0850 ± 0.0493 | 0.0919 ± 0.0328 | 0.5972b |
Indicated values shown are mean ± standard deviation. aThe p values according to a chi-squared test between the dance, music, and control groups. bThe p values according to the ANOVA test. FD indicates framewise displacement.
Scores of C-IRI in dancer and musician groups.
| Dancer group | Musician group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-IRI total | 63.47 ± 6.23 | 64.13 ± 8.24 | 0.79 |
| PT | 17.76 ± 2.56 | 18.20 ± 1.66 | 0.58 |
| FS | 12.59 ± 2.92 | 14.07 ± 3.73 | 0.22 |
| EC | 19.29 ± 4.57 | 17.20 ± 3.91 | 0.18 |
| PD | 13.82 ± 3.30 | 14.67 ± 3.58 | 0.49 |
Indicated values shown are mean ± standad deviation.
Insular subdivision connectivity in dancers, musicians, and controls.
| Region | BA | MNI coordinates | Peak | Cluster voxels | Post hoc analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| a (dancer-control) | b (musician-control) | c (dancer-musician) | ||||
| Seed: left PI | |||||||||
| ACC | BA 24 | 5 | 26 | 26 | 8.95 | 36 |
|
| — |
| MCC | BA 23 | 9 | -12 | 39 | 8.87 | 32 |
|
| — |
| Seed: right PI | |||||||||
| MCC | BA 48 | 6 | -19 | 40 | 9.21 | 68 |
| — | — |
| ACC | BA 48 | 6 | 24 | 26 | 9.32 | 39 |
| — | — |
| Seed: left vAI | |||||||||
| MFC | BA 8 | -4 | 19 | 51 | 14.23 | 246 |
|
| — |
| INS.L | BA 48 | -38 | 15 | 2 | 13.32 | 162 |
|
| — |
| MTG.L | BA 21 | -63 | -48 | -2 | 8.86 | 85 |
|
| — |
| ACC | BA 32 | 10 | 29 | 33 | 8.58 | 46 |
|
| — |
| Seed: right vAI | |||||||||
| MFC | BA 8 | -3 | 23 | 51 | 12.65 | 194 |
|
| — |
| INS.L | BA 48 | -36 | 16 | 2 | 15.58 | 171 |
|
| — |
| MTG.L | BA 21 | -61 | -47 | -2 | 20.55 | 127 |
|
| — |
| ACC | BA 32 | 13 | 29 | 23 | 7.96 | 42 |
|
| — |
| Seed: left dAI | |||||||||
| MTG.L | BA 21 | -61 | -47 | -4 | 13.23 | 124 |
|
| — |
| MTG.R | BA 21 | 61 | -44 | -6 | 9.63 | 108 | — |
| — |
| ACC | BA 32 | 10 | 29 | 24 | 14.48 | 96 |
|
| — |
| Seed: right dAI | |||||||||
| MTG.L | BA 21 | -63 | -48 | -4 | 19.09 | 168 |
|
| — |
| ACC | BA 32 | 10 | 31 | 25 | 13.28 | 102 |
| — |
|
| PoCG.L | BA 43 | -59 | -14 | 31 | 11.09 | 122 | — |
|
|
| MTG.R | BA 21 | 62 | -41 | -6 | 11.01 | 127 | — |
| — |
| PrCG.R | BA 6 | 46 | 2 | 31 | 10.07 | 119 | — |
|
|
a indicates the values for post hoc analysis between the dancers and the controls. b indicates the values for post hoc analysis between the musicians and the controls. c indicates the values for post hoc analysis between the dancers and the musicians. — indicates that the comparison results of post hoc analysis were not significant.
Figure 1Functional connectivity of PI seeds. (a) Represents the results of the left PI, and (b) represents the results of the right PI. There is increased FC between PI and ACC and MCC in dancers and musicians compared with controls.
Figure 2Functional connectivity of vAI seeds. (a) Represents the results of left vAI, and (b) represents the result of the right vAI. Increased FC is observed in ACC, MFC, left MTG, and left insula in dancers and musicians compared with controls.
Figure 3Functional connectivity of dAI seeds. (a) Represents the results of the left dAI, and (b) represents the results of the right dAI. A significant increase in FC between dAI and ACC and left MTG is observed in dancers and musicians compared with controls. Only in the musician group is there a significantly higher FC between dAI and left postcentral and right precentral gyrus.
Figure 4The positive associations between C-IRI scores and FC in the dancer group. Linear partial correlation coefficients between FC (left PI and MCC) and PT scores in dancers (blue solid line) and musicians (red broken line).
Relationship between FC and C-IRI scores.
| C-IRI scores | Total | PT | EC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D ( | M ( | D-M | D ( | M ( | D-M | D ( | M ( | D-M | |
| FC (left PI-MCC) | -0.353/0.264 | -0.247/0.182 | 0.473 | 0.580/0.014∗ | -0.338/0.299 | 0.004∗ | 0.261/0.271 | 0.249/0.295 | 0.912 |
| FC (left vAI-MTG) | -0.189/0.575 | 0.524/0.024∗ | 0.036∗ | 0.281/0.273 | 0.264/0.341 | 0.426 | -0.042/0.763 | 0.532/0.024∗ | 0.022∗ |
| FC (right vAI-MTG) | -0.235/0.262 | 0.526/0.019∗ | 0.013∗ | -0.042/0.687 | 0.317/0.242 | 0.642 | -0.108/0.590 | 0.482/0.031∗ | 0.017∗ |
D represents dancer group; M represents musician group.
Figure 5The positive associations between C-IRI scores and FC in the musician group. Linear partial correlation coefficients between FC and C-IRI scores in dancers (blue broken line) and musicians (red solid line). (a) Shows correlations between FC (between left vAI and MTG) and C-IRI total scores. (b) Shows correlations between FC (between left vAI and MTG) and EC scores. (c) Shows correlations between FC (between right vAI and MTG) and C-IRI total scores. (d) Shows correlations between FC (between right vAI and MTG) and EC scores.