Literature DB >> 31196504

Is there a relationship between preoperative diagnosis and clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? An experience in 699 shoulders.

Benjamin J Lindbloom1, Kaitlyn N Christmas2, Katheryne Downes2, Peter Simon2, Paul B McLendon1, A Vincent Hess2, Mark A Mighell1, Mark A Frankle3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of diagnosis on outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is not completely understood. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of different pathologies.
METHODS: A total of 699 RSAs were performed for the following diagnoses: (1) rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCA), (2) massive cuff tear (MCT) with osteoarthritis (OA), (3) MCT without OA, (4) OA, (5) acute proximal humeral fracture, (6) malunion, (7) nonunion, and (8) inflammatory arthropathy. All patients had minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (mean, 47 months; range, 24-155 months). Range of motion, Simple Shoulder Test scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, visual analog scale scores for function, and health-related quality-of-life measures were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively.
RESULTS: The RCA, MCT-with-OA, MCT-without-OA, and OA groups all exhibited significant improvements in all outcome scores and in all planes of motion from preoperatively until a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. The malunion, nonunion, and inflammatory arthropathy groups showed improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, forward flexion, and abduction. The average changes for all other outcomes and planes of motions were also positive but did not reach statistical significance. After adjustment for age and compared with RCA, female patients with malunion had significantly poorer forward flexion (P < .05), those with OA had significantly better abduction (P < .05), and those with fractures had significantly worse patient satisfaction (P < .05). Among male patients, those with MCTs without OA had significantly worse satisfaction (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: RSA reliably provides improvement regardless of preoperative diagnosis. Although subtle differences exist between male and female patients, improvements in clinical outcome scores were apparent after RSA.
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; arthritis; clinical outcomes; diagnosis; fracture; rotator cuff arthropathy; rotator cuff tear; shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31196504     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  16 in total

1.  Improved Clinical Outcomes After Lateralized Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jóni Nunes; Renato Andrade; Clara Azevedo; Nuno V Ferreira; Nuno Oliveira; Emílio Calvo; João Espregueira-Mendes; Nuno Sevivas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasties Performed for Proximal Humeral Fractures Versus Elective Etiologies.

Authors:  Liau Zi Qiang Glen; Chin Kai Cheong; Kameswara Rishi Yeshayahu Nistala; Phua Kean Ann Sean; Li Tian Pei; Manohara Ruben
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Comparison of Early Range of Motion in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Based on Indication: A Single Center Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Michael E Doany; Kenny Ling; Rosen Jeong; Alireza Nazemi; David E Komatsu; Edward D Wang
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Su Cheol Kim; Jong Hun Park; Hashem Bukhary; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Alexandros Kiriazis; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-20

6.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff tears without arthritis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Aparna Viswanath; Steve Bale; Ian Trail
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-15

7.  Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased symptomatic acromial and scapular spine stress fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matt Miller; Peter N Chalmers; Jacob Nyfeler; Luke Mhyre; Cade Wheelwright; Kristin Konery; Jun Kawakami; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-07

Review 8.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

9.  Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Clinical comparison of humeral-lateralization reverse total shoulder arthroplasty between patients with irreparable rotator cuff tear and patients with cuff tear arthropathy.

Authors:  Jae-Hoo Lee; Yong-Min Chun; Doo-Sup Kim; Doo-Hyung Lee; Sang-Jin Shin
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.