Literature DB >> 31195056

Effects of Transcranial Static Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Cortex Evaluated by Different TMS Waveforms and Current Directions.

Paula Davila-Pérez1, Alvaro Pascual-Leone2, Javier Cudeiro3.   

Abstract

Transcranial static magnetic stimulation (tSMS) modulates cortical excitability probably by interacting with the GABA-glutamate intracortical balance. Different transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) waveforms probe distinct GABA-mediated cortical inhibition networks. The goal of the present work is to further characterize tSMS-induced changes in motor cortex reactivity and inhibition-excitation (I/E) balance. We hypothesized that tSMS affects particular cortical networks and thus, the effects of tSMS would be different depending on the TMS waveform used to assess its results. 23 healthy young adults completed two sessions of real or sham tSMS. The order of the sessions was randomized across participants. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cortical silent period (CSP), short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were assessed with TMS monophasic posterior-anterior (monoPA; n = 9), monophasic anterior-posterior (monoAP; n = 7), or biphasic (biAP-PA; n = 7) pulses. Repeated measures analyses of variance and appropriate pairwise comparisons were performed for each TMS measure. After 15 min of real tSMS, the MEP amplitudes decreased compared to sham and baseline, SICI and LICI showed greater inhibition, and a tendency towards longer CSPs and less facilitation was found. These results were only observed with monoPA TMS. MEP amplitude increased compared to sham with monoAP TMS, with no clear changes in general intracortical I/E balance. Biphasic TMS was not able to capture any effects of tSMS. The results show that the effects of tSMS on cortical excitability and inhibition involve specific interneuron circuits that are selectively activated by monoPA TMS.
Copyright © 2019 IBRO. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biphasic; current direction; monophasic; paired-pulse TMS; transcranial magnetic stimulation; transcranial static magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31195056      PMCID: PMC6688472          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.05.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  28 in total

1.  The cortical silent period: intrinsic variability and relation to the waveform of the transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse.

Authors:  M Orth; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  I-wave origin and modulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; P Profice; F Ranieri; F Capone; M Dileone; A Oliviero; F Pilato
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Decreased input to the motor cortex increases motor cortical excitability.

Authors:  Gabrielle Todd; Jane E Butler; S C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Static magnetic field can transiently alter the human intracortical inhibitory system.

Authors:  Ippei Nojima; Satoko Koganemaru; Hidenao Fukuyama; Tatsuya Mima
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of M1 reduces corticospinal excitability without distorting sensorimotor integration in humans.

Authors:  Pablo Arias; Lucía Adán-Arcay; Beatriz Puerta-Catoira; Antonio Madrid; Javier Cudeiro
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  The minimal number of TMS trials required for the reliable assessment of corticospinal excitability, short interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation.

Authors:  Mana Biabani; Michael Farrell; Maryam Zoghi; Gary Egan; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Corticospinal activity evoked and modulated by non-invasive stimulation of the intact human motor cortex.

Authors:  Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) of the visual cortex decreases experimental photophobia.

Authors:  Elena Lozano-Soto; Vanesa Soto-León; Simona Sabbarese; Lara Ruiz-Alvarez; Margarita Sanchez-Del-Rio; Juan Aguilar; Bryan A Strange; Guglielmo Foffani; Antonio Oliviero
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 6.292

10.  Dopamine-dependent changes of cortical excitability induced by transcranial static magnetic field stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M Dileone; M C Carrasco-López; J C Segundo-Rodriguez; L Mordillo-Mateos; N López-Ariztegui; F Alonso-Frech; M J Catalan-Alonso; J A Obeso; A Oliviero; G Foffani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Static magnetic stimulation in the central nervous system: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nuria Viudes-Sarrion; Enrique Velasco; Miguel Delicado-Miralles; Carmen Lillo-Navarro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.830

2.  Static magnetic field stimulation of the supplementary motor area modulates resting-state activity and motor behavior.

Authors:  José A Pineda-Pardo; Ignacio Obeso; Pasqualina Guida; Michele Dileone; Bryan A Strange; José A Obeso; Antonio Oliviero; Guglielmo Foffani
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-10-31

3.  Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation facilitates hand motor function and cortical excitability: A crossover, randomized, double blind study.

Authors:  Meng-Fei Zhang; Wei-Zhou Chen; Fub-Biao Huang; Zhi-Yong Peng; Ying-Chan Quan; Zhi-Ming Tang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.086

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.