| Literature DB >> 31193936 |
Clara Bik-San Lau1,2,3, Grace Gar-Lee Yue1,2, Kit-Man Lau1,2, Yuk-Yu Chan3, Pang-Chui Shaw1,2,3,4, Hin-Fai Kwok1,2, Lok-Sze Wong1,2.
Abstract
Quality surveillance on authentication, safety and efficacy of proprietary Chinese medicines (pCm) are certainly the top priorities for the industries. Nowadays, the quality control system adopted is mainly chemical marker-oriented, concerning basically the correct use of raw material and safety issues, while the biological activities of the chemical marker(s) are seldom considered. Hence, there is an undefined relationship between the amount of chemical markers and the claimed pharmacological activities. In view of the need in identifying appropriate markers for biological standardization of pCm products, the present study aimed to establish a systematic methodology for verifying whether the chemical marker of a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) listed in Chinese Pharmacopoeia could be upgraded to a bioactive marker with certain efficacy in treating a particular disease. Our proposed methodology included a series of work on extraction, quantification, literature search and in vivo pharmacological experiments, in which the water extractability, biological effects at theoretical dose and oral bioavailability of the candidate chemical markers were all taken into consideration. The feasibility and implication of this bioactive markers verification methodology were further elaborated. Our findings will serve as the foundation for further research and development of biological standardization of TCM.Entities:
Keywords: Bioactive marker; CP, Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China; Chemical marker; Method establishment study; Proprietary Chinese medicines; Quality control; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine; pCm, proprietary Chinese medicines
Year: 2018 PMID: 31193936 PMCID: PMC6544610 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2018.09.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Fig. 1A workflow for verifying whether a chemical marker listed in Chinese pharmacopoeia could be upgraded to a bioactive marker for a particular TCM.
Fig. 2TLC chromatogram of Danshen samples observed under visible light (upper panel) or UV 365 nm (lower panel). Stationary phase: TLC silica gel F254 plate (Merck, NJ, USA); mobile phase: chloroform-toluene- ethyl acetate-methanol- formic acid (6: 4: 8: 1: 4, v/v) and then petroleum ether (60–90 °C)- ethyl acetate (4: 1, v/v). Lane 1: Salvianolic acid B (Rf 0.28); Lane 2: Tanshinone IIA (Rf 0.62); Lane 3: Reference herb (National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, China); Lane 4: Sample 3497; Lane 5: Sample 3501; Lane 6: Sample 3502; Lane 7: Sample 3535; Lane 8: Sample 3536; Lane 9: Sample 3537.
Amount of “cryptotanshinone + tanshinone I + tanshinone IIA” and “salvianolic acid B” in the raw herb of different Danshen samples.
| Danshen samples voucher specimen numbers | Cryptotanshinone + Tanshinone I + Tanshinone IIA (CP standard: ≥ 0.250%) | Salvianolic acid B (CP standard: ≥ 3.000%) |
|---|---|---|
| 3497 | 0.152% | 4.751% |
| 3501 | 0.108% | 1.010% |
| 3502 | 0.118% | 2.824% |
| 3535 | 0.104% | 1.556% |
| 3536 | 0.086% | 2.358% |
| 3537 | 0.072% | 0.888% |
Amount of chemical markers in Danshen 3497 aqueous extract.
| Chemical markers | Amount in Danshen 3497 aqueous extract (w/w) |
|---|---|
| Cryptotanshinone | <0.0014% |
| Tanshinone I | 0.0036% |
| Tanshinone IIA | <0.0014% |
| Salvianolic acid B | 5.2410% |