| Literature DB >> 35677447 |
Yongheng Wei1, Lei Nie1, Lele Gao1, Liang Zhong1, Zhongyu Sun1, Xiangchun Yang1, Jianan Yue1, Yingzi Zeng2, Lian Li1,3, Jing Sun4, Hengchang Zang1,5,3,4.
Abstract
Xinkeshu tablets (XKST), a traditional Chinese patent medicine (CPM), have served in the clinical treatment of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) for decades. However, its pharmacodyamic material basis was still unclear, and the holistic quality control has not been well established due to the lack of systematic research on the quality markers. In this experiment, the heart rate recovery rate of a zebrafish larva was used to evaluate the traditional pharmacological effect of XKST i.e., antiarrhythmic effect. The HPLC fingerprints of 16 batches of XKST samples were obtained, and antiarrhythmic components of XKST were identified by establishing the spectrum-effect relationship between HPLC fingerprints and heart rate recovery rate of zebrafish larva with orthogonal signal correction and partial least squares regression (OSC-PLSR) analysis. The anticardiovascular disease components of XKST were identified by mapping the targets related to CVDs in network pharmacology. The compounds of XKST absorbed and exposed in vivo were identified by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography Q-Exactive high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-Exactive HRMS). Based on the earlier studies, combined with five principles for identifying quality markers and verified by a zebrafish arrhythmia model, danshensu, salvianolic acid A, salvianolic acid B, daidzein, and puerarin were identified as quality markers of XKST. In total, 16 batches of XKST samples were further quantified with the method established in this study. Our study laid the foundation for the quality control of XKST. The integrated strategy used in the study of XKST could be applied for the identification and quantification of quality markers of other CPMs as well.Entities:
Keywords: Xinkeshu tablets; network pharmacology; pharmacodynamics of zebrafish; plasma pharmacochemistry; quality markers; spectrum-effect relationship
Year: 2022 PMID: 35677447 PMCID: PMC9170229 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.899038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1Strategy to identify and quantify quality markers of XKST.
FIGURE 2HPLC fingerprints of 16 batches of XKST and reference fingerprint.
Heart rate recovery rate of zebrafish larvae treated with XKST.
| Group | Concentration | Heart rate per minute | Heart rate recovery rate/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | — | 162.82 ± 4.67 | 100 |
| Model | — | 98.06 ± 6.55## | 0 |
| ISO | 20 μM | 152.73 ± 4.73** | 84.42 |
| S1 | 200 μg/ml | 143.77 ± 5.54** | 70.58 |
| S2 | 200 μg/ml | 150.64 ± 6.25** | 81.2 |
| S3 | 200 μg/ml | 137.54 ± 7.33** | 60.96 |
| S4 | 200 μg/ml | 135.75 ± 7.14** | 58.2 |
| S5 | 200 μg/ml | 131.00 ± 8.83** | 50.86 |
| S6 | 200 μg/ml | 138.75 ± 8.00** | 62.83 |
| S7 | 200 μg/ml | 131.31 ± 7.26** | 51.34 |
| S8 | 200 μg/ml | 141.21 ± 6.17** | 66.64 |
| S9 | 200 μg/ml | 141.69 ± 7.57** | 67.38 |
| S10 | 200 μg/ml | 114.55 ± 8.68** | 25.45 |
| S11 | 200 μg/ml | 127.33 ± 8.37** | 45.2 |
| S12 | 200 μg/ml | 131.45 ± 6.68** | 51.57 |
| S13 | 200 μg/ml | 124.50 ± 5.59** | 40.83 |
| S14 | 200 μg/ml | 141.82 ± 6.59** | 67.57 |
| S15 | 200 μg/ml | 141.00 ± 7.12** | 66.31 |
| S16 | 200 μg/ml | 129.00 ± 7.25** | 47.78 |
# p < 0.05 vs. control, ## p < 0.01 vs. control, *p < 0.05 vs. model, **p < 0.01 vs. model.
Optimized results of the PLS model.
| Grouping method | Pretreatment method | Number of OSC | PLS component number | Cumulative | Cumulative |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | PLSR | 0 | 2 | 0.752 | 0.654 | 0.340 |
| KS | OSC–PLSR | 1 | 1 | 0.873 | 0.985 | 0.980 |
| SPXY | OSC–PLSR | 1 | 1 | 0.889 | 0.979 | 0.966 |
FIGURE 3Coefficient plot (A) and VIP plot (B) of the OSC–PLS model grouped using the KS and SPXY method. (A1) Coefficient plot of the OSC–PLS model grouped using the KS method, (B1) VIP plot of the OSC–PLS model grouped using the KS method, (A2) Coefficient plot of the OSC–PLS model grouped using the SPXY method, and (B2) VIP plot of the OSC–PLS model grouped using the SPXY method.
FIGURE 4Predicted results of the OSC–PLSR model grouped using the KS (A) and SPXY methods (B).
Forty-four anticardiovascular disease components of XKST identified by network pharmacology.
| Serial number | Compound name | Serial number | Compound name |
|---|---|---|---|
| XKST-01 | Quinic acid | XKST-23 | Ginsenoside Rb1 |
| XKST-02 | Malic acid | XKST-24 | Ginsenoside Rg2 |
| XKST-03 | Danshensu | XKST-25 | Ginsenoside Rh1 |
| XKST-04 | Chlorogenic acid | XKST-26 | Formononetin |
| XKST-05 | Puerarin | XKST-27 | Ginsenoside Rd |
| XKST-06 | Daidzin | XKST-28 | Notoginsenoside K |
| XKST-07 | Genistein-8-C-glucoside | XKST-29 | Ginsenoside Rg3 |
| XKST-08 | Hyperoside | XKST-30 | Salvianolic acid F |
| XKST-09 | Apigenin-7-O-glucoside | XKST-31 | Salvianolic acid G |
| XKST-10 | Salvianolic acid D | XKST-32 | Protocatechuic acid |
| XKST-11 | Rosmarinic acid | XKST-33 | Sophoraside A |
| XKST-12 | Ononin | XKST-34 | Caffeic Acid |
| XKST-13 | Notoginsenoside R1 | XKST-35 | Genistein-8-C-glucoside |
| XKST-14 | Daidzein | XKST-36 | Lithospermic acid |
| XKST-15 | Ginsenoside Rg1 | XKST-37 | Pueroside B |
| XKST-16 | Ginsenoside Re | XKST-38 | 4′,6-Dimethoxyisoflavone-7-O-glucoside |
| XKST-17 | Biochanin A | XKST-39 | 5′-Hydroxyl oninin |
| XKST-18 | Salvianolic acid A | XKST-40 | Daidzein-4′,7-diglucoside |
| XKST-19 | Salvianolic acid B | XKST-41 | Cumoesterol |
| XKST-20 | Genistein | XKST-42 | Costunolide |
| XKST-21 | Salvianolic acid C | XKST-43 | Dehydrocostus lactone |
| XKST-22 | Notoginsenoside R2 | XKST-44 | Oleanic acid |
FIGURE 5Compound–target network of XKST.
FIGURE 6KEGG mechanism analysis.
FIGURE 7Total ion chromatogram of XKST (A), blank plasma (B), and plasma-containing drug (C).
Identification of compounds of XKST absorbed and exposed in vivo
| Number | t R/min | Compound | Formula | Parent ion ( | Theoretical value ( | Error ( × 10−6) | Daughter ion (m/z) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.39 | Danshensu | C9H10O5 | 197.0446 [M−H]− | 197.0448 | −1.6544 | 179 [M−H−H2O]− |
| 2 | 5.75 | Puerarin-7-O-glucoside | C27H30O14 | 577.1667 [M−H]− | 577.1556 | 19.1040 | 457 [M−H−C4H8O4]− |
| 3 | 6.98 | Daidzin-4′-O-glucoside | C27H30O14 | 623.1628 [M + HCOO]− | 623.1612 | 2.6446 | 415 [M−H−C6H10O5]− |
| 4 | 7.15 | 3′- Hydroxypuerarin | C21H20O10 | 431.0985 [M−H]− | 431.0978 | 1.7351 | 311 [M−H−C4H8O4]− |
| 5 | 9.01 | Puerarin | C21H20O9 | 415.1035 [M−H]− | 415.1028 | 1.6430 | 295 [M−H−C4H8O4]− |
| 6 | 9.67 | Quinic acid | C7H12O6 | 191.0052 [M−H]− | 191.0555 | −4.6322 | 147 [M−H−CO2]− |
| 111 [M−H−CO2−2H2O]− | |||||||
| 7 | 10.14 | Mirificin | C26H28O13 | 547.1466 [M−H]− | 547.1450 | 2.7141 | 295 [M−H−C5H8O4−C4H8O4]− |
| 8 | 10.62 | 3′-Methoxy puerarin 6'' -O-ß-Apionoside | C27H30O14 | 577.1567 [M−H]− | 577.1556 | 1.7777 | 325 [M−H−C5H8O4−C4H8O4]− |
| 9 | 11.41 | 3′-Methoxy daidzin | C22H22O10 | 491.1204 [M + HCOO]− | 491.1189 | 3.0848 | 445 [M−H]− |
| 283 [M−H−C6H10O5]− | |||||||
| 10 | 12.04 | Genistein-8-C-apiosyl (1-6)-glucoside | C26H28O14 | 563.1420 [M−H]− | 563.1399 | 3.5728 | 311 [M−H−C5H8O4−C4H8O4]− |
| 11 | 12.3 | Pueroside A | C29H34O14 | 605.1890 [M−H]− | 605.1869 | 3.3295 | 297 [M−H−C6H10O4−C6H10O5]− |
| 12 | 13.76 | 4′- Methoxypuerarin | C22H22O9 | 429.1187 [M−H]− | 429.1185 | 0.5290 | 309 [M−H−C4H8O4]− |
| 13 | 13.94 | Formononetin-8-C | C27H30O13 | 561.1623 [M−H]− | 561.1606 | 2.7800 | 309 [M−H−C5H8O4−C4H8O4]− |
| -glucoside-O-xyloside | |||||||
| 14 | 14.02 | Salvianolic acid D | C20H18O10 | 417.0836 [M−H]− | 417.0820 | 3.6060 | 373 [M−H−CO2]− |
| 175 [M−H−CO2−C9H10O5]− | |||||||
| 15 | 15.29 | Sophoraside A | C24H26O10 | 519.1519 [M + HCOO]− | 519.1502 | 3.3401 | 311 [M−H−C6H10O5]− |
| 267 [M−H−C6H10O5−CO2]− | |||||||
| 16 | 15.65 | Ononin | C22H22O9 | 475.1252 [M + HCOO]− | 475.1240 | 2.6288 | 267 [M−H−C6H10O5]− |
| 17 | 15.9 | Daidzein | C15H10O4 | 253.0506 [M−H]− | 253.0500 | 2.3434 | 224 [M−H−CHO]− |
| 209 [M−H−CO2]− | |||||||
| 18 | 16.3 | Biochanin A | C16H12O5 | 283.0617 [M−H]− | 283.0606 | 3.9532 | 268 [M−H−CH3]− |
| 19 | 16.5 | Salvianolic acid A | C26H22O10 | 493.1153 [M−H]− | 493.2588 | 3.8389 | 295 [M−H−C9H10O5]− |
| 20 | 16.74 | Salvianolic acid B | C36H30O16 | 717.1475 [M−H]− | 717.1454 | 2.8153 | 519 [M−H−C9H10O5]− |
FIGURE 8Heart rate recovery rate of zebrafish larvae treated with compounds. n = 12. # p < 0.05 vs. control, ## p < 0.01 vs. control, *p < 0.05 vs. model, and **p < 0.01 vs. model
Contents (μg/g) of quality markers of XKST.
| Sample | Content (μg/g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danshensu | Puerarin | Daidzein | Salvianolic acid B | Salvianolic acid A | |
| S1 | 4223.32 | 28213.79 | 1035.98 | 10842.07 | 2602.99 |
| S2 | 4645.43 | 25973.15 | 755.31 | 13433.78 | 2720.34 |
| S3 | 4548.31 | 27011.45 | 850.48 | 12978.71 | 3418.48 |
| S4 | 4346.63 | 27310.96 | 853.23 | 12193.43 | 3218.52 |
| S5 | 4834.66 | 17357.93 | 687.33 | 11219.66 | 3150.94 |
| S6 | 4368.05 | 17249.23 | 716.81 | 11894.80 | 2663.78 |
| S7 | 4376.49 | 25873.43 | 836.48 | 10747.91 | 3245.27 |
| S8 | 3457.47 | 26854.15 | 990.81 | 12068.66 | 2389.18 |
| S9 | 3666.63 | 26107.29 | 897.71 | 10429.67 | 2394.46 |
| S10 | 4926.06 | 19833.88 | 791.76 | 11696.36 | 2863.85 |
| S11 | 4502.94 | 19999.11 | 805.41 | 12098.40 | 2569.36 |
| S12 | 4369.58 | 21819.44 | 909.39 | 11414.44 | 2752.03 |
| S13 | 5075.79 | 19329.50 | 787.09 | 11406.17 | 2901.71 |
| S14 | 4080.40 | 21690.52 | 955.59 | 11615.34 | 2521.53 |
| S15 | 3751.31 | 20709.28 | 938.12 | 11375.23 | 2447.42 |
| S16 | 4034.66 | 24343.50 | 931.46 | 11310.97 | 2976.10 |
| Average | 4325.48 | 23104.79 | 858.93 | 11670.35 | 2802.25 |
| RSD (%) | 10.42 | 16.23 | 11.53 | 6.68 | 11.58 |