| Literature DB >> 31193388 |
Yoko Kaichi1, Keizo Tanitame2, Hiroaki Terada1, Hideki Itakura3, Haruya Ohno4, Masayasu Yoneda4, Yuji Takahashi5, Yuji Akiyama1, Kazuo Awai1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: CAS, clinical activity score; FSE-IDEAL, fast spin-echo iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; SI, signal intensity; TAO, thyroid-associated orbitopathy; fast spin-echo iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (FSE-IDEAL); orbital fat volume; proptosis; quantitative evaluation; thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO); water fraction
Year: 2019 PMID: 31193388 PMCID: PMC6526225 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2019.05.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Radiol Open ISSN: 2352-0477
Fig. 1Control Axial water- (A) and fat image (B). Yellow circles identify the ROIs. Using the average signal intensity (SI) in the ROIs, the water fraction in orbital fat was calculated as SI water / (SI water + SI fat).
Fig. 2Control Axial fat image (A). The selected orbital fat is green. We separated fat tissue using an adequate signal intensity (SI) threshold and manually removed extraorbital fat. The average SI in the internal rectus muscle was 92; the standard deviation (SD) was 39. In orbital fat, the the average SI was 1306 and the SD was 54. Therefore the threshold value was [(92 + 39) + (1306 - 54)] / 2 = 691. Using FSE-IDEAL images we then produced 3D reconstruction images of the bilateral orbital fat (B) and measured the orbital fat volume on a workstation.
Fig. 3Control Maximum-diameter slice in-phase image. The yellow horizontal line connects the bilateral frontal processes in the zygomatic bones. The distance from the top of the cornea to the horizontal line was measured to determine the degree of proptosis.
Fig. 4Comparison of the quantitative data of 22 TAO patients and 22 healthy controls by Mann–Whitney U test.
Box-and-whisker plots show water fraction of orbital fat (A), orbital fat volume (B) and proptosis (C). The plots show the minimum and maximum values (lower and upper horizontal lines, respectively), the median values (line in box) and the interquartile ranges (box) in each dataset. Significant differences are indicated with the P value. In TAO patients, the value of water fraction, fat volume and degree of proptosis were significantly higher than in the controls.
Fig. 5Bland-Altman analysis confirming the interobserver variability or the water fraction (WF) (A), the volume of orbital fat (FV) (B) and the proptosis (C) on FSE-IDEAL images of the participants. R1 = reader1, R2 = reader2.
Correlations among data obtained in 22 TAO patients.
| Right | Water fraction | Fat volume | Proptosis | ||||
| Proptosis | −0.10 | 0.67 | 0.35 | 0.11 | - | - | |
| Water fraction | - | - | −0.35 | 0.11 | - | - | |
| Age | 0.04 | 0.86 | −0.01 | 0.98 | −0.07 | 0.76 | |
| TAO duration | −0.36 | 0.10 | −0.12 | 0.59 | 0.04 | 0.84 | |
| CAS | −0.17 | 0.44 | 0.16 | 0.47 | 0.30 | 0.18 | |
| Left | Water fraction | Fat volume | Proptosis | ||||
| Proptosis | −0.15 | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.15 | - | - | |
| Water fraction | - | - | −0.53 | 0.01 | - | - | |
| Age | 0.39 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.96 | −0.01 | 0.97 | |
| TAO duration | 0.15 | 0.51 | −0.15 | 0.50 | 0.06 | 0.80 | |
| CAS | 0.04 | 0.84 | 0.16 | 0.47 | 0.20 | 0.36 | |
TAO: thyroid-associated orbitopathy, CAS: clinical activity score