Alexis Ollitrault1, Frédérique Charbonneau2, Marie-Laure Herdan3, Olivier Bergès2, Kevin Zuber4, Lama Giovansili5, Pauline Launay5, Julien Savatovsky2, Augustin Lecler2. 1. Department of Neuroradiology, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 25 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France. alexis.ollitrault@gmail.com. 2. Department of Neuroradiology, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 25 rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France. 3. Department of Orbitopalpebral Surgery, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 25 rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France. 4. Department of Clinical Research, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 25 rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 25 rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic performances of a single Dixon-T2-weighted imaging (WI) sequence compared to a conventional protocol including T1-, T2-, and fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI at 3 T when assessing thyroid eye disease (TED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB-approved prospective single-center study enrolled participants presenting with confirmed TED from April 2015 to October 2019. They underwent an MRI, including a conventional protocol and a Dixon-T2WI sequence. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to all data, read both datasets independently and randomly. They assessed the presence of extraocular muscle (EOM) inflammation, enlargement, fatty degeneration, or fibrosis as well as the presence of artifacts. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. RESULTS: Two hundred six participants were enrolled (135/206 [66%] women, 71/206 [34%] men, age 52.3 ± 13.2 years). Dixon-T2WI was significantly more likely to detect at least one inflamed EOM as compared to the conventional set (248/412 [60%] versus 228/412 [55%] eyes; (p = 0.02). Dixon-T2WI was more sensitive and specific than the conventional set for assessing muscular inflammation (100% versus 94.7% and 71.2% versus 68.5%, respectively). Dixon-T2WI was significantly less likely to show major or minor artifacts as compared to fat-suppressed T2WI (20/412 [5%] versus 109/412 [27%] eyes, p < 0.001, and 175/412 [42%] versus 257/412 [62%] eyes, p < 0.001). Confidence was significantly higher with Dixon-T2WI than with the conventional set (2.35 versus 2.24, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Dixon-T2WI showed higher sensitivity and specificity and showed fewer artifacts than a conventional protocol when assessing thyroid eye disease, in addition to higher self-reported confidence. KEY POINTS: • Dixon-T2WI has better sensitivity and specificity than a conventional protocol for assessing inflamed extraocular muscles in patients with thyroid eye disease. • Dixon-T2WI shows significantly fewer artifacts than fat-suppressed T2WI. • Dixon-T2WI is faster and is associated with significantly higher self-reported reader confidence as compared to a conventional protocol when assessing inflammatory extraocular muscles.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic performances of a single Dixon-T2-weighted imaging (WI) sequence compared to a conventional protocol including T1-, T2-, and fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI at 3 T when assessing thyroid eye disease (TED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB-approved prospective single-center study enrolled participants presenting with confirmed TED from April 2015 to October 2019. They underwent an MRI, including a conventional protocol and a Dixon-T2WI sequence. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to all data, read both datasets independently and randomly. They assessed the presence of extraocular muscle (EOM) inflammation, enlargement, fatty degeneration, or fibrosis as well as the presence of artifacts. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. RESULTS: Two hundred six participants were enrolled (135/206 [66%] women, 71/206 [34%] men, age 52.3 ± 13.2 years). Dixon-T2WI was significantly more likely to detect at least one inflamed EOM as compared to the conventional set (248/412 [60%] versus 228/412 [55%] eyes; (p = 0.02). Dixon-T2WI was more sensitive and specific than the conventional set for assessing muscular inflammation (100% versus 94.7% and 71.2% versus 68.5%, respectively). Dixon-T2WI was significantly less likely to show major or minor artifacts as compared to fat-suppressed T2WI (20/412 [5%] versus 109/412 [27%] eyes, p < 0.001, and 175/412 [42%] versus 257/412 [62%] eyes, p < 0.001). Confidence was significantly higher with Dixon-T2WI than with the conventional set (2.35 versus 2.24, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Dixon-T2WI showed higher sensitivity and specificity and showed fewer artifacts than a conventional protocol when assessing thyroid eye disease, in addition to higher self-reported confidence. KEY POINTS: • Dixon-T2WI has better sensitivity and specificity than a conventional protocol for assessing inflamed extraocular muscles in patients with thyroid eye disease. • Dixon-T2WI shows significantly fewer artifacts than fat-suppressed T2WI. • Dixon-T2WI is faster and is associated with significantly higher self-reported reader confidence as compared to a conventional protocol when assessing inflammatory extraocular muscles.
Entities:
Keywords:
Artifacts; Eye diseases; Magnetic resonance imaging; Thyroid diseases