Yasuhiro Homma1, Atsuhiko Mogami2, Tomonori Baba3, Kiyohito Naito3, Taiji Watari3, Osamu Obayashi2, Kazuo Kaneko3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. yhomma@juntendo.ac.jp. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, 1129 Nagaoka, Izunokuni, 410-2295, Shizuoka, Japan. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A virtual reality simulator developed for orthopaedic and trauma surgical training has been introduced. However, it is unclear whether the experiences of actual surgery are reflected in virtual reality simulation surgery (VRSS) using a simulator. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the results in VRSS differ between a trauma expert and a trauma novice. METHODS: In Group A (expert), there are ten orthopaedic trauma surgeons and in Group B (novice) ten residents within 2 years after medical school graduation. VRSS for a femoral neck fracture using Hansson hook-pins (Test 1) and Hansson twin hook plate (Test 2) was performed. The parameters evaluated were total procedure time (s), fluoroscopy time (s), number of times X-ray was used (defined by the number of times the foot pedal was used), number of retries in guide placement, and final implant position. RESULTS: In Test 1, the averages of four parameters (distance to posterior cortex (p = 0.009), distal pin distance above lesser trochanter (p = 0.015), distal pin hook angular error (p = 0.004), and distal pin tip distance to centre (lateral) (p = 0.015)) were significantly different between Groups A and B. In Test 2, no parameters in a mean were significantly different between groups, but seven parameters in a variance (guide wire distance to joint surface (p = 0.0191), twin hook length outside barrel (p = 0.011), twin hook tip distance to centre (lateral) (p = 0.042), twin hook distance to centre of lateral cortex (lateral) (p = 0.016), plate end alignment error (lateral) (p = 0.027), guide wire angle with lateral cortex (front) (p = 0.024), and 3.2-mm drill outside cortex (p = 0.000)) were significantly different between groups. In Test 1, Group B showed significantly longer fluoroscopy time than Group A (p = 0.044). In Test 2, Group B showed significantly fewer instances of X-ray use than Group A (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the experiences of actual surgery are reflected in the result of VRSS using the simulator.
INTRODUCTION: A virtual reality simulator developed for orthopaedic and trauma surgical training has been introduced. However, it is unclear whether the experiences of actual surgery are reflected in virtual reality simulation surgery (VRSS) using a simulator. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the results in VRSS differ between a trauma expert and a trauma novice. METHODS: In Group A (expert), there are ten orthopaedic trauma surgeons and in Group B (novice) ten residents within 2 years after medical school graduation. VRSS for a femoral neck fracture using Hansson hook-pins (Test 1) and Hansson twin hook plate (Test 2) was performed. The parameters evaluated were total procedure time (s), fluoroscopy time (s), number of times X-ray was used (defined by the number of times the foot pedal was used), number of retries in guide placement, and final implant position. RESULTS: In Test 1, the averages of four parameters (distance to posterior cortex (p = 0.009), distal pin distance above lesser trochanter (p = 0.015), distal pin hook angular error (p = 0.004), and distal pin tip distance to centre (lateral) (p = 0.015)) were significantly different between Groups A and B. In Test 2, no parameters in a mean were significantly different between groups, but seven parameters in a variance (guide wire distance to joint surface (p = 0.0191), twin hook length outside barrel (p = 0.011), twin hook tip distance to centre (lateral) (p = 0.042), twin hook distance to centre of lateral cortex (lateral) (p = 0.016), plate end alignment error (lateral) (p = 0.027), guide wire angle with lateral cortex (front) (p = 0.024), and 3.2-mm drill outside cortex (p = 0.000)) were significantly different between groups. In Test 1, Group B showed significantly longer fluoroscopy time than Group A (p = 0.044). In Test 2, Group B showed significantly fewer instances of X-ray use than Group A (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the experiences of actual surgery are reflected in the result of VRSS using the simulator.
Authors: Henrik Palm; Steffen Jacobsen; Michael Krasheninnikoff; Nicolai Bang Foss; Henrik Kehlet; Peter Gebuhr Journal: Injury Date: 2006-10-17 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Nicole D Rynecki; Daniel Coban; Owen Gantz; Raghav Gupta; Varun Ayyaswami; Arpan V Prabhu; Jeremy Ruskin; Sheldon S Lin; Kathleen S Beebe Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Aparna K Mohan; Michael Hauptmann; Martha S Linet; Elaine Ron; Jay H Lubin; D Michal Freedman; Bruce H Alexander; John D Boice; Michele Morin Doody; Genevieve M Matanoski Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-06-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: José Negrillo-Cárdenas; Juan-Roberto Jiménez-Pérez; Joaquim Madeira; Francisco R Feito Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2021-08-07 Impact factor: 2.924