Brian J Rebolledo1, Jennifer Hammann-Scala2, Alejandro Leali3, Anil S Ranawat3. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA rebolledob@hss.edu. 2. Bioskills Education Laboratory, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical simulation has become increasingly relevant to orthopaedic surgery education and could translate to improved operating room proficiency in orthopaedic surgery trainees. PURPOSE: To compare the arthroscopic performance of junior orthopaedic surgery residents who receivedtraining with a knee and shoulder arthroscopy surgical simulator with those who received didactic training. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS:Fourteen junior orthopaedic surgery residents at a single institution were randomized to receive knee and shoulder arthroscopy training with a surgical simulator (n = 8) or didactic lectures with arthroscopy models (n = 6). After their respective training, performance in diagnostic knee and shoulder arthroscopy was assessed using a cadaveric model. Time to completion and assessment of arthroscopic handling using a subjective injury grading index (scale, 1-10) was then used to evaluate performance in final cadaveric testing. RESULTS:Orthopaedic surgery residents who trained with a surgical simulator outperformed the didactic-trained residents in shoulder arthroscopy by time to completion (-35%; P = .02) and injury grading index (-35%; P = .01). In addition, a trend toward improved performance of knee arthroscopy by the simulator-trained group was found by time to completion (-36%; P = .09) and injury grading index (P = .08). CONCLUSION: In this study, junior orthopaedic surgery residents who trained with asurgical simulator demonstrated improved arthroscopic performance in both knee and shoulder arthroscopy. However, future validation of surgical simulator training for orthopaedic surgery residents remains warranted. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgical skill development with an arthroscopy surgical simulator could translate to improved arthroscopy performance in the operating room.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Surgical simulation has become increasingly relevant to orthopaedic surgery education and could translate to improved operating room proficiency in orthopaedic surgery trainees. PURPOSE: To compare the arthroscopic performance of junior orthopaedic surgery residents who received training with a knee and shoulder arthroscopy surgical simulator with those who received didactic training. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Fourteen junior orthopaedic surgery residents at a single institution were randomized to receive knee and shoulder arthroscopy training with a surgical simulator (n = 8) or didactic lectures with arthroscopy models (n = 6). After their respective training, performance in diagnostic knee and shoulder arthroscopy was assessed using a cadaveric model. Time to completion and assessment of arthroscopic handling using a subjective injury grading index (scale, 1-10) was then used to evaluate performance in final cadaveric testing. RESULTS: Orthopaedic surgery residents who trained with a surgical simulator outperformed the didactic-trained residents in shoulder arthroscopy by time to completion (-35%; P = .02) and injury grading index (-35%; P = .01). In addition, a trend toward improved performance of knee arthroscopy by the simulator-trained group was found by time to completion (-36%; P = .09) and injury grading index (P = .08). CONCLUSION: In this study, junior orthopaedic surgery residents who trained with a surgical simulator demonstrated improved arthroscopic performance in both knee and shoulder arthroscopy. However, future validation of surgical simulator training for orthopaedic surgery residents remains warranted. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgical skill development with an arthroscopy surgical simulator could translate to improved arthroscopy performance in the operating room.
Authors: Stephan Reppenhagen; Manuel Weißenberger; Thomas Barthel; Maximilian Rudert; Hermann Anetzberger Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Jonathan R Kusins; Jason A Strelzow; Marie-Eve LeBel; Louis M Ferreira Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2018-03-17 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Courtney D Bell; Joseph G O'Sullivan; Tamara E Ostervoss; William E Cameron; Ryan C Petering; Jacqueline M Brady Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2020-06
Authors: Mark D Orland; Michael J Patetta; Michael Wieser; Erdan Kayupov; Mark H Gonzalez Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 4.755