Literature DB >> 31187244

Comparative analysis of biomechanical parameters of the corneas following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and contralateral healthy corneas.

Natalya F Shilova1, Yoav Nahum2,3, Avital Adler2,3, Irit Bahar2,3, Boris E Malyugin4, Natalia S Anisimova4, Eitan Livny2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of the unilateral operated corneas in patients who had undergone Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) with those of the contralateral normal corneas.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at university hospitals (Department of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel, and S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery State Institution, Moscow, Russia). Forty eyes of 20 patients who underwent DMEK for unilateral PBK 3.5 to 36 months ago and with normal fellow eyes were included in the study. An ocular response analyzer was used to measure the corneal biomechanical properties in the operated and normal fellow eyes. The main outcome measures were corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF).
RESULTS: The mean CH (8.4 ± 1.5 mmHg vs. 8.2 ± 1.5 mmHg, P = 0.707) and the mean CRF (8.7 ± 1.6 mmHg vs. 8.3 ± 1.6 mmHg, P = 0.419) values did not show any statistically significant difference between the operated and the normal fellow eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the corneas that underwent DMEK for PBK showed normal values for biomechanical parameters. These findings support the previous studies that have reported near complete visual, functional, and ultra-structural rehabilitation of the corneas following DMEK.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal biomechanics; DMEK; Intraocular pressure; Keratoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31187244     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04387-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  24 in total

Review 1.  The application of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to different experimental designs in optometry.

Authors:  R A Armstrong; F Eperjesi; B Gilmartin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician?

Authors:  Aachal Kotecha
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Dolores Ortiz; David Piñero; Mohamed H Shabayek; Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Michael C Chen; Nancy Lee; Nirit Bourla; D Rex Hamilton
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese.

Authors:  Andrew Lam; Davie Chen; Roger Chiu; Wan-Sang Chui
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kimiya Shimizu; Fumiko Ohmoto
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry.

Authors:  David Touboul; Cynthia Roberts; Julien Kérautret; Caroline Garra; Sylvie Maurice-Tison; Elodie Saubusse; Joseph Colin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  María A del Buey; José A Cristóbal; Francisco J Ascaso; Laura Lavilla; Elena Lanchares
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Raciha Beril Kucumen; Nursal Melda Yenerel; Ebru Gorgun; Destan Nil Kulacoglu; Banu Oncel; Maryo Cenk Kohen; Murat Levent Alimgil
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Corneal Biomechanical Assessment with Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Imaging During Non-Contact Tonometry: A Prospective Review.

Authors:  Pedro Manuel Baptista; Renato Ambrosio; Luis Oliveira; Pedro Meneres; Joao Melo Beirao
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.