| Literature DB >> 31185632 |
Lumin Gao1,2, Xue Lin3,4, Chunyan Xie5, Tianyong Zhang6, Xin Wu7,8, Yulong Yin9,10.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the effect of Calcium (Ca) feeding time on a sow's productive performance and the profiles of serum mineral elements during late pregnancy and lactation. A total of 75 pregnant sows were assigned to three groups: The control (C), earlier-later (E-L), and later-earlier (L-E) groups. During late pregnancy, the C group was fed an extra 4.5 g Ca (in the form of CaCO3) at both 06:00 and 15:00, the E-L group was fed an extra 9 g Ca at 06:00, and the L-E group was fed an extra 9 g Ca at 15:00. Similar treatments with double the amount of Ca were applied during lactation. The results show that, compared with the C group, L-E feeding decreased the number of stillbirths and the duration of farrowing and placenta expulsion (FARPLA) and increased the average daily weight gain (ADG) of piglets. Similarly, E-L feeding increased the ADG of piglets (p < 0.05). Furthermore, both E-L and L-E feeding increased the Ca levels in sow serum and umbilical serum, and the Fe levels in umbilical serum, but decreased the Ca levels in the placenta and colostrum (p < 0.05). Experiments on the genes involved in mineral element transport showed that E-L feeding activated the mRNA expression of TRPV5, S100G, SLC30A7, SLC39A4, and Ferroportin1, while it inhibited the mRNA expression of ATP7A in the placenta (p < 0.05). Moreover, L-E feeding up-regulated the mRNA expression of ATP2B and IREB2, while it down-regulated the mRNA expression of ATP7B in the placenta (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that maternal Ca feeding at 15:00 h during late pregnancy and lactation decreased FARPLA and stillbirths and improved the growth performance of suckling piglets by altering the mineral element of the metabolism in the umbilical serum and milk, compared to conventional feeding regimes.Entities:
Keywords: calcium; milk; mineral element profile; sow; umbilical serum
Year: 2019 PMID: 31185632 PMCID: PMC6617234 DOI: 10.3390/ani9060337
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Composition and nutrient levels of diets (air-dry basis) (%).
| Items | Late Pregnancy Diet | Lactation Diet |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredients (%) | ||
| Ground corn | 46.37 | 55.05 |
| Soybean meal | 10.43 | 9.00 |
| Wheat bran | 25.00 | 20.00 |
| Wheat | 10.92 | 8.00 |
| Zeolite powder | 3.55 | 4.26 |
| CaHPO4 | 1.27 | 1.27 |
| CaCO3 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Lysine (54.6%) | 0.44 | 0.40 |
| Phytase 1 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Premix 2 | 2.02 | 2.02 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Chemical composition % 3 | ||
| DE (kcal/kg) | 3000.72 | 3418.67 |
| Ca (%) | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Total phosphorus (P) (%) | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| Available P (%) | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Crude fat (%) | 6.70 | 4.82 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 4.28 | 2.77 |
| Ash (%) | 4.59 | 3.33 |
1 Phytase, 1000 FTU/kg (FTU: Fytase Unit), from Axtra® PHY (a new generation fungal phytase, 6-phytase from Buttiauxella sp., expressed in Trichoderma reesei), Danisco Animal Nutrition, DuPont Industrial Biosciences. 2 The vitamin–mineral premix provided the following per kilogram of diet: 30 mg of antioxidant, 6000 IU (International Unit) of vitamin A, 3000 IU of vitamin D3, 20 IU of vitamin E, 1.8 mg of vitamin K3, 2.0 mg of thiamine, 6.0 mg of riboflavin, 4.0 mg of pyridoxine, 0.02 mg of vitamin B12, 26.0 mg of niacin, 18.0 mg of pantothenic acid, 3.2 mg of folic acid, 0.4 mg of biotin, 27 mg of Mg as MgSO4·H2O. 3 The nutrient levels were calculated values.
Sequence of primers for real time-polymerase chain reaction.
| Target Gene | Gene Bank ID | Nucleotide Sequence of Primers (5′–3′) | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ca transporter | |||
| ATP2B1 | XM_021091182.1 | F:CTGGTTGGATTGAAGGTGCT | 123 |
| R:GCTCCTGCTCAATTCGACTC | |||
| TRPV6 | XM_021078898.1 | F:CTAACAAGCTGGGCCATTTC | 119 |
| R:GCTGTACATGAAGGGCAGGT | |||
| TRPV5 | XM_021078897.1 | F:CATGTACTTTGCCCGAGGAT | 125 |
| R:GGCAAATCCCAGAGTAACCA | |||
| CACNA2D1 | XM_021102233.1 | F:TGTACCTGGATGCACTGGAA | 122 |
| R:TCCCATCACACCAAGAATCA | |||
| S100G | NM_214140.2 | F:TCCTGCAGAACTGAAGAGCA | 133 |
| R:TAGGGTTCTCGGACCTTTCA | |||
| Zn transporter | |||
| Slc30A7 | XM_005655460.2 | F:CCTCTTTAACGGTGCTCTCG | 119 |
| R:CATGAAAGTGTCCGTGTCCA | |||
| Slc30A9 | NM_001137632.1 | F:ATTAGGCGTGGTCTCAGCAT | 119 |
| R:TTACTGACGGGTCGTTCTCC | |||
| Slc39A4 | XM_021090449.1 | F:AGCTCAGCCAGTCAGAGAGG | 123 |
| R:TGACGTAGTGGGTAGCAGCA | |||
| Slc39A14 | XM_005657235.3 | F:AGGATGAAAGGAAGGGCAGT | 114 |
| R:TACCCGATCTGGATCTGTCC | |||
| Fe transporter | |||
| Ferroportin1 | XM_013984335.2 | F:TGGGTGAGAAAGACCCTGAC | 109 |
| R:TAGGAGACCCATCCATCTCG | |||
| IREB2 | NM_001167781.1 | F:CTCTTCCCGGACAGTGTTGT | 124 |
| R:GAGAAACTGGCAGACCAAGC | |||
| FRRS1 | XM_021088483.1 | F:CCTGCGTCTTCTTGTCCTTC | 120 |
| R:CATCATCATCACCCATCCAA | |||
| Cu transporter | |||
| CCS | NM_001001866.1 | F:CTTCAGGATGGAGGATGAGC | 119 |
| R:TCCCGGTGATCTTGGATAAG | |||
| ATP7A | XM_013990938.2 | F:TCTGGCAGCACTGTTATTGC | 116 |
| R:GCCTCCTCCACAAGTTTGAC | |||
| ATP7B | XM_021065286.1 | F:TATGACCCTTCCTGCGTCTC | 121 |
| R:ACCTGGCATCTGTTCCTGTC | |||
| MT-2b | XM_003355808.4 | F:TCCTGCAAATGCAAAGACTG | 119 |
| R:CACTTGTCCGAGGCTCCTT | |||
| CTR1 | NM_214100.3 | F:CGCAAATCACAAGTCAGCAT | 129 |
| R:CACTGTCTGCAGGAGGTGAG | |||
| Others | |||
| Slc11A2(DMT1) | XM_021081710.1 | F:GTCTCAGTCTTTGCCGAAGC | 120 |
| R:CACAGCCAGTGTCGAGTTGT | |||
| GAPDH | XM_021091114.1 | F:GTCGGTTGTGGATCTGACCT | 120 |
| R:GTCCTCAGTGTAGCCCAGGA | |||
Real time-polymerase chain reaction system.
| Item | μL |
|---|---|
| SYBR Green Supermix 1 | 5 |
| Forward Primer | 0.5 |
| Reverse primer | 0.5 |
| cDNA template | 2 |
| Nuclease-free water. | 2 |
| Total | 10 |
1 SYBR Green: SYBR Green Nucleic Acid Gel Stains.
Effects of Ca feeding time on sow performance (n = 25).
| Item | Dietary Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C Group | E-L Group | L-E Group | ||
| Parity | 4.05 ± 0.350 | 4.00 ± 0.297 | 4.38 ± 0.344 | 0.677 |
| Daily feed intake of per sow, kg | ||||
| 85th–114th day of pregnancy | 2.09 ± 0.148 | 2.26 ± 0.054 | 2.24 ± 0.075 | 0.435 |
| 1st to 14th day of lactation | 4.64 ± 0.349 | 4.89 ± 0.432 | 4.99 ± 0.459 | 0.826 |
| Sow backfat thickness, mm | ||||
| On 85th day of pregnancy | 15.89 ± 0.491 | 15.58 ± 0.491 | 15.47 ± 0.509 | 0.891 |
| On 1st day of lactation | 16.58 ± 0.745 | 15.84 ± 0.584 | 16.74 ± 0.648 | 0.713 |
| On 14th day of lactation | 14.58 ± 0.652 | 14.26 ± 0.728 | 14.74 ± 0.732 | 0.915 |
| BF gain or loss, mm | ||||
| 85th day of pregnancy to farrowing | 0.69 ± 0.737 | 0.95 ± 0.594 | 1.79 ± 0.379 | 0.537 |
| 1st–14th day of lactation | −2.00 ± 0.562 | −1.58 ± 0.636 | −2.00 ± 0.341 | 0.857 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), n = 25. The control (C) group = fed extra Ca at both 06:00 and 15:00, the earlier-later (E-L) group = fed extra Ca at 06:00, and the laer-earlier (L-E) group = fed extra Ca at 15:00, the same as below.
The reproductive performance of sows (n = 25).
| Item | Dietary Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C Group | E-L Group | L-E Group | ||
| Litter size, | 12.14 ± 0.517 | 11.85 ± 0.460 | 12.5 ± 0.489 | 0.651 |
| Number born alive, | 10.38 ± 0.374 a | 10.45 ± 0.444 ab | 11.4 ± 0.358 b | 0.134 |
| Number of stillbirths, | 1.71 ± 0.293 | 1.1 ± 0.260 | 0.95 ± 0.198 | 0.087 |
| IUGR, | 0.23 ± 0.136 | 0.05 ± 0.040 | 0.15 ± 0.130 | 0.548 |
| Birth weight, kg | 1.36 ± 0.045 | 1.48 ± 0.052 | 1.40 ± 0.033 | 0.178 |
1 Neonatal piglets with birth weights close to the mean birth weight (±0.5 standard deviation (SD)) were identified as having normal birth weights, whereas piglets with at least 1.5 SD lower birth weight were defined as suffering from intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR). a,b Within a row, means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05) by t-test.
Figure 1Duration of farrowing and placenta expulsion (FARPLA) of sows, FARPLA is defined as the time interval between the birth of the first piglet and the expulsion of the last placenta. n = 25.
Growth performance of suckling piglets (n = 20).
| Item | Dietary Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C Group | E-L Group | L-E Group | ||
| Number of piglets ( | ||||
| 1st day of life | 11.6 ± 0.210 | 11.20 ± 0.263 | 11.63 ± 0.283 | 0.436 |
| 14th day of life | 9.11 ± 0.285 | 9.75 ± 0.216 | 9.30 ± 0.230 | 0.17 |
| Survival rate, % | 80.37 ± 2.728 b | 88.67 ± 2.152 a | 83.23 ± 2.305 ab | 0.049 |
| Body weight (kg) on: | ||||
| 1st day of life | 1.34 ± 0.038 | 1.42 ± 0.049 | 1.40 ± 0.034 | 0.403 |
| 7th day of life | 2.39 ± 0.111 b | 2.68 ± 0.074 a | 2.87 ± 0.091 a | 0.002 |
| 14th day of life | 3.57 ± 0.132 b | 4.35 ± 0.098 a | 4.62 ± 0.122 a | <0.001 |
| Daily gains, kg | ||||
| 1–7 | 0.15 ± 0.015 b | 0.18 ± 0.012 ab | 0.21 ± 0.015 a | 0.028 |
| 7–14 | 0.17 ± 0.010 b | 0.24 ± 0.006 a | 0.25 ± 0.011 a | <0.001 |
| 1–14 | 0.16 ± 0.009 b | 0.2 ± 0.008 a | 0.23 ± 0.010 a | <0.001 |
a,b Within a row, means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05) by t-test.
The concentrations of Ca, Cu, Fe, and Zn in the serum of sows and umbilical cord at parturition (n = 9).
| Item | Dietary Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C Group | E-L Group | L-E Group | ||
| Sow serum on farrowing day | ||||
| Ca (mmol/L) | 2.22 ± 0.06 b | 2.43 ± 0.07 a | 2.42 ± 0.05 a | 0.045 |
| Cu (µg/mL) | 1.24 ± 0.06 b | 1.47 ± 0.09 a | 1.42 ± 0.06 ab | 0.087 |
| Fe (µg/mL) | 1.23 ± 0.387 | 2.75 ± 0.631 | 2.07 ± 0.552 | 0.165 |
| Zn (µg/mL) | 1.70 ± 0.44 a | 0.51 ± 0.14 b | 1.03 ± 0.35 ab | 0.090 |
| Umbilical cord serum | ||||
| Ca (mmol/L) | 2.96 ± 0.23 a | 4.55 ± 0.14 c | 3.67 ± 0.22 b | 0.001 |
| Cu (µg/mL) | 0.50 ± 0.23 a | 0.08 ± 0.01 b | 0.05 ± 0.02 b | 0.021 |
| Fe (µg/mL) | 1.70 ± 0.41 b | 5.72 ± 0.63 a | 5.40 ± 0.98 a | 0.001 |
| Zn (µg/mL) | 1.33 ± 0.23 b | 3.75 ± 1.16 a | 2.42 ± 0.68 ab | 0.110 |
a,b,c Within a row, means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05) by t-test.
The concentrations of Ca, Cu, Fe, and Zn in the sows’ placenta (n = 9).
| Item | Dietary Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C Group | E-L Group | L-E Group | ||
| Ca (mg/100 g) | 36.58 ± 3.28 a | 29.41 ± 1.60 b | 27.65 ± 1.96 b | 0.036 |
| Cu (mg/100 g) | 0.049 ± 0.01 a | 0.052 ± 0.01 a | 0.028 ± 0.003 b | 0.041 |
| Fe (mg/100 g) | 4.17 ± 0.93 a | 2.21 ± 0.44 b | 2.17 ± 0.29 b | 0.048 |
| Zn (mg/100 g) | 0.50 ± 0.05 a | 0.40 ± 0.04 ab | 0.34 ± 0.04 b | 0.046 |
a,b Within a row, means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05) by t-test.
Figure 2mRNA expression of Ca, Cu, Fe, and Zn transporters in the placenta of sows; n = 9. Statistical significances were set at * p < 0.05.
The concentration of Ca, Cu, Fe, and Zn in the colostrum of sows (n = 9).
| Item | Dietary Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C Group | E-L Group | L-E Group | ||
| Ca (g/L) | 59.93 ± 9.407 a | 34.06 ± 2.590 b | 33.36 ± 2.322 b | 0.017 |
| Cu (µg/mL) | 1.62 ± 0.234 b | 3.27 ± 0.821 a | 3.17 ± 0.406 a | 0.016 |
| Fe (µg/mL) | 9.00 ± 2.810 | 8.38 ± 3.300 | 6.62 ± 1.690 | 0.811 |
| Zn (µg/mL) | 10.07 ± 1.603 b | 16.67 ± 1.407 a | 14.08 ± 0.774 a | 0.010 |
a,b Within a row, means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05) by t-test.
Figure 3The concentration of Ca, Zn, Cu, and Fe in the serum and milk of sows on day 7 of lactation. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 9. Statistical significances were set at # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 at 12:00 and at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 at 24:00.