| Literature DB >> 29767060 |
Zhiyong Fan1, Yong Xiao1, Yonghui Chen1, Xin Wu2, Guanglei Zhang1, Qinhua Wang1, Chunyan Xie2.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of catechins on reproductive performance, antioxidative capacity and immune function of gestating sows. A total of 60 cross-bred (Landrace × Large White) multiparious sows were blocked by body weight, parity and backfact and randomly allocated to 1 of 5 treatments: 0, 100, 200, 300, or 400 mg/kg catechins. Dietary treatments were imposed from mating to d 40 of gestation of sows. At farrowing, litter total born, born alive, dead, and normal-(healthy piglets, ≥0.85 kg) and low-birth weight piglets (<0.85 kg) were recorded. Within 3.00 ± 0.50 days after farrowing litter size was standardized to 8.00 ± 1.50 piglets within treatment. The piglets were weighed at birth (d 1) and weaning (d 28). Sows serum samples were obtained from blood samples collected on d 40 of gestation for analyses of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), nitric oxide synthetase (NOS) and nitrogen monoxide (NO). Our results showed that supplementation of catechins at levels of 200 or 300 mg/kg led to improvements in litter born alive (P < 0.01) and piglet born healthy (P < 0.01) and a decrease in stillborn (P < 0.05) at farrowing when compared with the control. In comparison with the control, catechins at any supplemental levels all enhanced the serum SOD (P < 0.05) and CAT (P < 0.01) activities of sows at farrowing but no obvious differences in the serum GSH-Px and NOS activities were observed in this trial (P > 0.05). Sows received 200 mg catechin per kg diets showed a reduction (P < 0.05) of the serum MDA level at farrowing compared with all other treatments. Sows received all the levels of catechin showed a reduction (P < 0.05) of serum H2O2 level compared with sows received the control diet on both d 40 of gestation and farrowing. Our results demonstrated that the catechins may be a potential antioxidant to increase the reproductive performance and antioxidative capacity of sows when it was added into diets during the early gestation.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidative capacity; Catechins; Gestating sows; Litter size; Reproductive performance
Year: 2015 PMID: 29767060 PMCID: PMC5941005 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.11.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Nutr ISSN: 2405-6383
Ingredient and chemical composition of basal diet (air-dry basis).
| Ingredient, % | Content | Chemical composition, % of DM | Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 70.00 | Digestible energy, MJ/kg DM | 13.40 |
| Soybean meal | 11.20 | Crude protein | 13.10 |
| Wheat bran | 14.40 | Lysine | 0.60 |
| Fish meal | 1.60 | Methionine | 0.20 |
| CaHPO4 | 1.10 | Calcium | 0.75 |
| CaCO3 | 0.16 | Total phosphorus | 0.60 |
| NaCl | 0.40 | Available-P | 0.37 |
| Premix | 1.14 | Crude fiber | 3.30 |
| Total | 100 |
DM = dry matter.
The premix provided the following per kilogram of diet: Cu5 mg, Fe 80 mg, Zn 50 mg, Mn 20 mg, Se 0.15 mg, I 0.14 mg, VA 4,000 IU, VD3 200 IU, VE 44 IU, VK3 4.00 mg, VB1 1.0 mg, VB2 3.75 mg, VB3 40.60 mg, pantothenic acid 20.0 mg, VB6 10 mg, VB12 0.015 μg, folic acid 12 mg, d-biotin 0.34 mg.
Effects of dietary catechins on litter performance.
| Item | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | Group V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piglet born alive | 8.70 ± 0.70bAB | 7.60 ± 0.92bB | 11.60 ± 0.90aA | 11.40 ± 0.68aA | 10.10 ± 1.06abAB | 0.005 |
| Piglet born healthy | 7.70 ± 0.61a | 7.10 ± 0.79a | 10.70 ± 0.76b | 10.70 ± 0.62b | 8.70 ± 1.00ab | 0.001 |
| Low birth weight piglets | 0.58 ± 0.19 | 0.40 ± 0.22 | 0.91 ± 0.21 | 0.64 ± 0.31 | 1.33 ± 0.58 | 0.307 |
| Stillborn | 0.75 ± 0.25a | 0.30 ± 0.15ab | 0.09 ± 0.30b | 0.09 ± 0.30b | 0.22 ± 0.15b | 0.027 |
| Birth weight, g | 1578 ± 65.23 | 1533 ± 51.41 | 1524 ± 32.90 | 1653 ± 75.95 | 1564 ± 75.45 | 0.603 |
Values are means ± SE, n = 12. Means within a row without common lower-case letters (P < 0.05) and upper-case letters (P < 0.01) differ.
Effects of catechins on antioxidant enzymes and radicals in serum of the pregnant sows.
| Item | Period | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | Group V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSH-Px, U/mL | d 40 of gestation | 277.8 ± 2.33 | 285.4 ± 8.56 | 293.1 ± 7.17 | 290.2 ± 6.21 | 258.3 ± 5.25 | 0.229 |
| Farrowing | 300.0 ± 6.35 | 327.2 ± 12.61 | 319.0 ± 19.44 | 314.4 ± 11.33 | 290.1 ± 16.38 | 0.364 | |
| SOD, U/mL | d 40 of gestation | 74.44 ± 1.37 | 75.12 ± 3.92 | 78.63 ± 3.28 | 78.43 ± 2.26 | 73.79 ± 6.04 | 0.824 |
| Farrowing | 80.25 ± 3.00b | 90.38 ± 2.32a | 90.00 ± 2.82a | 91.79 ± 2.31a | 89.03 ± 2.69a | 0.021 | |
| CAT, U/mL | d 40 of gestation | 2.74 ± 0.32 | 3.52 ± 0.57 | 3.66 ± 0.43 | 3.81 ± 0.20 | 4.06 ± 0.59 | 0.326 |
| Farrowing | 2.91 ± 0.36A | 3.96 ± 0.54B | 4.34 ± 0.25B | 4.29 ± 0.23B | 5.14 ± 0.29B | 0.005 | |
| NOS, U/mL | d 40 of gestation | 12.92 ± 0.71 | 12.83 ± 0.54 | 13.44 ± 0.54 | 13.72 ± 0.79 | 13.56 ± 0.65 | 0.830 |
| Farrowing | 9.11 ± 0.58 | 9.32 ± 0.77 | 8.79 ± 0.17 | 9.21 ± 0.52 | 9.47 ± 0.62 | 0.932 | |
| MDA, nmol/mL | d 40 of gestation | 7.21 ± 0.19 | 6.97 ± 0.14 | 6.84 ± 0.48 | 6.78 ± 0.33 | 7.08 ± 0.12 | 0.825 |
| Farrowing | 7.67 ± 0.23A | 6.97 ± 0.26A | 5.92 ± 0.42B | 7.01 ± 0.27A | 6.94 ± 0.20A | 0.008 | |
| H2O2, nmol/L | d 40 of gestation | 13.11 ± 0.51A | 11.75 ± 0.23B | 11.43 ± 0.22B | 11.00 ± 0.35B | 10.56 ± 0.22B | 0.000 |
| Farrowing | 15.53 ± 1.62a | 12.69 ± 0.64ab | 11.36 ± 0.60b | 11.27 ± 0.51b | 11.03 ± 0.47b | 0.020 | |
| NO, μmol/L | d 40 of gestation | 3.50 ± 0.036 | 3.64 ± 0.31 | 4.12 ± 0.25 | 4.27 ± 0.31 | 4.33 ± 0.42 | 0.321 |
| Farrowing | 2.87 ± 0.55 | 3.00 ± 0.20 | 3.18 ± 0.32 | 2.77 ± 0.07 | 2.90 ± 0.10 | 0.592 |
Values are means ± SE, n = 12. Means within a row without common lower-case letters (P < 0.05) and upper-case letters (P < 0.01) differ.
GSH-Px = glutathione peroxidase; SOD = superoxide dismutase; CAT = catalase; NOS = nitric oxide synthetase; MDA = malondialdehyde; H2O2 = hydrogen peroxide; NO = nitric oxide.