Literature DB >> 31183170

Results of concomitant groin-free percutaneous temporary RVAD support using a centrifugal pump with a double-lumen jugular venous cannula in LVAD patients.

Bastian Schmack1, Mina Farag1, Jamila Kremer1, Leonie Grossekettler2, Andreas Brcic3, Philip W Raake2, Michael M Kreusser2, Ranny Goldwasser1, Aron-Frederik Popov4, Ashham Mansur5, Matthias Karck1, Arjang Ruhparwar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have evolved to become standard of care in severe heart failure (HF) patients. Right HF (RHF) is a major complication responsible for early mortality. Several techniques for temporary right ventricular assist device (t-RVAD) have been described before, baring relevant disadvantages such as limited mobilization or the need for re-thoracotomy. We describe the results of an alternative technique for t-RVAD using the Tandem Heart™ with ProtekDuo™ cannula.
METHODS: An institutional retrospective single centre outcome analysis was performed including all permanent LVAD recipients with concomitant groin-free t-RVAD support.
RESULTS: Between October 2015 and September 2017, 11 patients (10 male, 90.9%) were included. Preoperative NYHA class was 3.8±0.75 and INTERMACS class 3.5±1.5. Four (36.4%) patients were already on mechanical circulatory support (MCS) at time of implantation with 4 (36.4%) patients already on inotropic support. All LVAD implantations were performed on-pump and 3 cases (27.3%) were re-do cases. Mean t-RVAD duration was 16.8±9.5 days. Ten patients (90.9%) could be weaned from temporary RVAD support, 1 patient deceased on support. Mean ICU stay was 23.8±16.5 days, while 30-day survival was 72.7%. Follow-up was complete with 214.7±283 days. Three patients (27.3%) died following multi-organ failure (MOF), 1 patient (9.1%) following intracranial bleed 12 days after t-RVAD explantation. No severe t-RVAD associated complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our technique allows for safe groin-free t-RVAD providing all advantages of percutaneous implantation including complete mobilization and bedside explantation without any need for operation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  INTERMACS; ProtekDuo; heart failure (HF); left ventricular assist device (LVAD); right ventricular failure

Year:  2019        PMID: 31183170      PMCID: PMC6535488          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  21 in total

1.  Decision tree for adjuvant right ventricular support in patients receiving a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Yajuan Wang; Marc A Simon; Pramod Bonde; Bronwyn U Harris; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Robert L Kormos; James F Antaki
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Nicholas C Dang; Veli K Topkara; Michelle Mercando; Joy Kay; Kurt H Kruger; Michael S Aboodi; Mehmet C Oz; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Temporary right heart assist: a minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Simon Schopka; Assad Haneya; Leopold Rupprecht; Daniele Camboni; Christof Schmid; Michael Hilker
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Alternative right ventricular assist device implantation technique for patients with perioperative right ventricular failure.

Authors:  Diyar Saeed; Bujar Maxhera; Hiroyuki Kamiya; Artur Lichtenberg; Alexander Albert
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Right ventricular failure after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device: analysis of predictors and outcomes.

Authors:  Casey Lo; Deirdre Murphy; Robyn Summerhayes; Margaret Quayle; Aiden Burrell; Michael Bailey; Silvana F Marasco
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  Validation of clinical scores for right ventricular failure prediction after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Andreas P Kalogeropoulos; Anita Kelkar; Jeremy F Weinberger; Alanna A Morris; Vasiliki V Georgiopoulou; David W Markham; Javed Butler; J David Vega; Andrew L Smith
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes.

Authors:  Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Francis D Pagani; Stuart D Russell; Ranjit John; Leslie W Miller; Todd Massey; Carmelo A Milano; Nader Moazami; Kartik S Sundareswaran; David J Farrar
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Risk score derived from pre-operative data analysis predicts the need for biventricular mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; Vivian M Hsu; Elliott D Kozin; Mary Lou O'Hara; Elan Howell; Deborah Dougherty; Ryan C McCormick; Carine A Laporte; Jeffrey E Cohen; Kevin W Southerland; Jessica L Howard; Mariell L Jessup; Rohinton J Morris; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates.

Authors:  Jennifer Cowger Matthews; Todd M Koelling; Francis D Pagani; Keith D Aaronson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device support for severe right heart failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion.

Authors:  Koji Takeda; Yoshifumi Naka; Jonathan A Yang; Nir Uriel; Paolo C Colombo; Ulrich P Jorde; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kartik S Telukuntla; Jerry D Estep
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Temporary Right-Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abdelshafy; Kadir Caliskan; Goksel Guven; Ahmed Elkoumy; Hagar Elsherbini; Hesham Elzomor; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Sakir Akin; Osama Soliman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  When to use central mechanical support devices.

Authors:  Michael Salna; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-03-21

4.  Temporary right ventricular circulatory support following right ventricular infarction: results of a groin-free approach.

Authors:  Jamila Kremer; Mina Farag; Andreas Brcic; Alina Zubarevich; Joel Schamroth; Michael M Kreusser; Matthias Karck; Arjang Ruhparwar; Bastian Schmack
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-08-05

5.  MitraClip implantation followed by insertion of a left ventricular assist device in patients with advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Michael M Kreusser; Sonja Hamed; Andreas Weber; Bastian Schmack; Martin J Volz; Nicolas A Geis; Leonie Grossekettler; Sven T Pleger; Arjang Ruhparwar; Hugo A Katus; Philip W Raake
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-10-26

6.  Ventricular assist device for a coronavirus disease 2019-affected heart.

Authors:  Tienush Rassaf; Matthias Totzeck; Amir A Mahabadi; Ulrike Hendgen-Cotta; Sebastian Korste; Stephan Settelmeier; Peter Luedike; Ulf Dittmer; Frank Herbstreit; Thorsten Brenner; Karin Klingel; Mike Hasenberg; Bernd Walkenfort; Matthias Gunzer; Thomas Schlosser; Alexander Weymann; Markus Kamler; Bastian Schmack; Arjang Ruhparwar
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-11-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.