Literature DB >> 20132950

Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes.

Robert L Kormos1, Jeffrey J Teuteberg, Francis D Pagani, Stuart D Russell, Ranjit John, Leslie W Miller, Todd Massey, Carmelo A Milano, Nader Moazami, Kartik S Sundareswaran, David J Farrar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes of right ventricular failure in a large population of patients implanted with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.
METHODS: Patients (n = 484) enrolled in the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (Thoratec, Pleasanton, Calif) bridge-to-transplantation clinical trial were examined for the occurrence of right ventricular failure. Right ventricular failure was defined as requiring a right ventricular assist device, 14 or more days of inotropic support after implantation, and/or inotropic support starting more than 14 days after implantation. Demographics, along with clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic data, were compared between patients with and without right ventricular failure, and risk factors were identified.
RESULTS: Overall, 30 (6%) patients receiving left ventricular assist devices required a right ventricular assist device, 35 (7%) required extended inotropes, and 33 (7%) required late inotropes. A significantly greater percentage of patients without right ventricular failure survived to transplantation, recovery, or ongoing device support at 180 days compared with patients with right ventricular failure (89% vs 71%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio of greater than 0.63 (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.3; P = .009), need for preoperative ventilator support (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-13.2; P < .001), and blood urea nitrogen level of greater than 39 mg/dL (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.1; P = .02) were independent predictors of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of right ventricular failure in patients with a HeartMate II ventricular assist device is comparable or less than that of patients with pulsatile-flow devices. Its occurrence is associated with worse outcomes than seen in patients without right ventricular failure. Patients at risk for right ventricular failure might benefit from preoperative optimization of right heart function or planned biventricular support. 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20132950     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  155 in total

1.  Decision tree for adjuvant right ventricular support in patients receiving a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Yajuan Wang; Marc A Simon; Pramod Bonde; Bronwyn U Harris; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Robert L Kormos; James F Antaki
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  A case of late-onset right ventricular failure after implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Koichiro Kinugawa; Taro Shiga; Miyoko Endo; Toshiro Inaba; Hisataka Maki; Masaru Hatano; Atsushi Yao; Takashi Nishimura; Yasunobu Hirata; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Ryozo Nagai
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 3.  The future of left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ahmet Kilic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  LaVone A Smith; Leora T Yarboro; Jamie L W Kennedy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Ventricular assist devices: pharmacological aspects of a mechanical therapy.

Authors:  O Wever-Pinzon; J Stehlik; A G Kfoury; J V Terrovitis; N A Diakos; C Charitos; D Y Li; S G Drakos
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 12.310

6.  Patient selection for advanced heart failure therapy referral.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Adam D DeVore; Robert J Mentz; Mani A Daneshmand; Chetan B Patel
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2014-03

7.  Predictors of hospital length of stay after implantation of a left ventricular assist device: an analysis of the INTERMACS registry.

Authors:  William G Cotts; Edwin C McGee; Susan L Myers; David C Naftel; James B Young; James K Kirklin; Kathleen L Grady
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 8.  Epidemiology and importance of renal dysfunction in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Gregory Giamouzis; Andreas P Kalogeropoulos; Javed Butler; Georgios Karayannis; Vasiliki V Georgiopoulou; John Skoularigis; Filippos Triposkiadis
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-12

Review 9.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 10.  Heart transplantation and end-stage cardiac amyloidosis: a review and approach to evaluation and management.

Authors:  Jerry D Estep; Arvind Bhimaraj; A M Cordero-Reyes; Brian Bruckner; Matthias Loebe; Guillermo Torre-Amione
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.