Literature DB >> 31180347

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials.

Pavel Prado-Gutiérrez1, Mónica Otero2, Eduardo Martínez-Montes3, Alejandro Weinstein4, María-José Escobar2, Wael El-Deredy4, Matías Zañartu2.   

Abstract

Neural entrainment refers to the synchronization of neural activity to the periodicity of sensory stimuli. This synchronization defines the generation of steady-state evoked responses (i.e., oscillations in the electroencephalogram phase-locked to the driving stimuli). The classic interpretation of the amplitude of the steady-state evoked responses assumes a stereotypical time-invariant neural response plus random background fluctuations, such that averaging over repeated presentations of the stimulus recovers the stereotypical response. This approach ignores the dynamics of the steady-state, as in the case of the adaptation elicited by prolonged exposures to the stimulus. To analyze the dynamics of steady-state responses, it can be assumed that the time evolution of the response amplitude is the same in different stimulation runs separated by sufficiently long breaks. Based on this assumption, a method to characterize the time evolution of steady-state responses is presented. A sufficiently large number of recordings are acquired in response to the same experimental condition. Experimental runs (recordings) are column-wise averaged (i.e., runs are averaged but epoch within recordings are not averaged with the preceding segments). The column-wise averaging allows analysis of steady-state responses in recordings with remarkably high signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, the averaged signal provides an accurate representation of the time evolution of the steady-state response, which can be analyzed in both the time and frequency domains. In this study, a detailed description of the method is provided, using steady-state visually evoked potentials as an example of a response. Advantages and caveats are evaluated based on a comparison with single-trial methods designed to analyze neural entrainment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31180347      PMCID: PMC7055073          DOI: 10.3791/59898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  50 in total

1.  The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates.

Authors:  G Savio; J Cárdenas; M Pérez Abalo; A González; J Valdés
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses.

Authors:  A Z Snyder
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 May-Jun

Review 3.  Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants.

Authors:  M Sasha John; David K Brown; Patricia J Muir; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Sustained spatial attention to vibration is mediated in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  C-M Giabbiconi; N J Trujillo-Barreto; T Gruber; M M Müller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Use of a steady-state baseline to address evoked vs. oscillation models of visual evoked potential origin.

Authors:  Minpeng Xu; Yihong Jia; Hongzhi Qi; Yong Hu; Feng He; Xin Zhao; Peng Zhou; Lixin Zhang; Baikun Wan; Wei Gao; Dong Ming
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Kalman Filter Based Estimation of Auditory Steady State Response Parameters.

Authors:  Robert Luke; Jan Wouters
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz.

Authors:  O G Lins; P E Picton; T W Picton; S C Champagne; A Durieux-Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  J L Valdes; M C Perez-Abalo; V Martin; G Savio; C Sierra; E Rodriguez; O Lins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Phase stability of auditory steady state responses in newborn infants.

Authors:  Jong Min Choi; David W Purcell; M Sasha John
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Rod Driven Frequency Entrainment and Resonance Phenomena.

Authors:  Christina Salchow; Daniel Strohmeier; Sascha Klee; Dunja Jannek; Karin Schiecke; Herbert Witte; Arye Nehorai; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Persistence of EEG Alpha Entrainment Depends on Stimulus Phase at Offset.

Authors:  Mónica Otero; Pavel Prado-Gutiérrez; Alejandro Weinstein; María-José Escobar; Wael El-Deredy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.