Literature DB >> 3117165

Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a prospective comparative clinical trial.

Z H Krukowski1, E L Cusick, J Engeset, N A Matheson.   

Abstract

Seven hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients undergoing a midline abdominal incision were stratified according to age, sex, type of operation and degree of operative contamination and were randomly allocated to mass closure of the abdominal wall with continuous 4 metric polydioxanone (PDX; 374 patients) or continuous 4 metric polypropylene (PPL; 383 patients). Wound infection was less common with PDX (PDX 3.5 per cent; PPL 7.0 per cent; P less than 0.05) and there was one dehiscence in each group. The incidence of defective wounds in patients surviving 1 year was similar (7.7 per cent PDX; 9.7 per cent PPL) but the PPL suture had to be removed because of persisting wound pain or sinus formation in five patients. PDX is the preferred suture material for closure of midline abdominal incisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3117165     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800740927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  9 in total

1.  [Incision and closure of the abdominal wall].

Authors:  M Bolli; M Schilling
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Decision analysis model of incisional hernia after open abdominal surgery.

Authors:  H Cheng; F Rupprecht; D Jackson; T Berg; M H Seelig
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Meta-analysis on Materials and Techniques for Laparotomy Closure: The MATCH Review.

Authors:  N A Henriksen; E B Deerenberg; L Venclauskas; R H Fortelny; M Miserez; F E Muysoms
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  N C Hodgson; R A Malthaner; T Ostbye
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Triclosan-coated sutures reduce wound infections after hepatobiliary surgery--a prospective non-randomized clinical pathway driven study.

Authors:  Christoph Justinger; Jochen Schuld; Jens Sperling; Otto Kollmar; Sven Richter; Martin Karl Schilling
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Suture choice to reduce occurrence of surgical site infection, hernia, wound dehiscence and sinus/fistula: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  B E Zucker; C Simillis; P Tekkis; C Kontovounisios
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  An ideal suture for midline abdominal closure?

Authors:  Vinay Gaikwad; Rajeev Kapoor; Robin Thambudorai
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079].

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Petra Baumann; Johannes Hüsing; Christoph Seidlmayer; Markus Albertsmeier; Annette Franck; Steffen Luntz; Christoph M Seiler; Hanns-Peter Knaebel
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Factors Affecting Midline Incisional Hernia Rates: Analysis of 14,618 Patients.

Authors:  David C Bosanquet; James Ansell; Tarig Abdelrahman; Julie Cornish; Rhiannon Harries; Amy Stimpson; Llion Davies; James C D Glasbey; Kathryn A Frewer; Natasha C Frewer; Daphne Russell; Ian Russell; Jared Torkington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.