Literature DB >> 29322212

Meta-analysis on Materials and Techniques for Laparotomy Closure: The MATCH Review.

N A Henriksen1, E B Deerenberg2, L Venclauskas3, R H Fortelny4, M Miserez5, F E Muysoms6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate closure materials and suture techniques for emergency and elective laparotomies. The primary outcome was incisional hernia after 12 months, and the secondary outcomes were burst abdomen and surgical site infection.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted until September 2017. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated by at least 3 assessors using critical appraisal checklists. Meta-analyses were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 23 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. There was no evidence from RCTs using the same suture technique in both study arms that any suture material (fast-absorbable/slowly absorbable/non-absorbable) is superior in reducing incisional hernias. There is no evidence that continuous suturing is superior in reducing incisional hernias compared to interrupted suturing. When using a slowly absorbable suture for continuous suturing in elective midline closure, the small bites technique results in significantly less incisional hernias than a large bites technique (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19, 0.86).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no high-quality evidence available concerning the best suture material or technique to reduce incisional hernia rate when closing a laparotomy. When using a slowly absorbable suture and a continuous suturing technique with small tissue bites, the incisional hernia rate is significantly reduced compared with a large bites technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29322212     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4393-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  43 in total

1.  Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Eva B Deerenberg; Joris J Harlaar; Ewout W Steyerberg; Harold E Lont; Helena C van Doorn; Joos Heisterkamp; Bas Pl Wijnhoven; Willem R Schouten; Huib A Cense; Hein Bac Stockmann; Frits J Berends; F Paul Hlj Dijkhuizen; Roy S Dwarkasing; An P Jairam; Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Smoking is a risk factor for incisional hernia.

Authors:  Lars Tue Sørensen; Ulla B Hemmingsen; Lene T Kirkeby; Finn Kallehave; Lars Nannestad Jørgensen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02

3.  Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.

Authors:  P C Richards; C M Balch; J S Aldrete
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a prospective comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Z H Krukowski; E L Cusick; J Engeset; N A Matheson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure.

Authors:  A E Cameron; C J Parker; E S Field; R C Gray; A P Wyatt
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure.

Authors:  A Bloemen; P van Dooren; B F Huizinga; A G M Hoofwijk
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Randomized comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing.

Authors:  P J Osther; P Gjøde; B B Mortensen; P B Mortensen; J Bartholin; F Gottrup
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  [Results of a controlled trial comparing 3 suture threads at slow resorption for the closure of supra-umbilical midline laparotomies].

Authors:  L Bresler; P J Courbey; L Feldman; J Bilweiss; J M Tortuyaux; P Rauch; P Boissel; J Grosdidier
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1995

9.  Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.

Authors:  H Gislason; J E Grønbech; O Søreide
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1995-05

10.  Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Hasan H Eker; Wim C J Hop; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  8 in total

1.  Acronyms Use in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Introduction to a New Language.

Authors:  B Ramana; Rudrajit Sinha; Brian Jacob; Shirin Towfigh; Danny Rosin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  [Prophylaxis of parastomal, perineal and incisional hernias in colorectal surgery].

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Daniela Salzmann; Kilian Gloy
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Novel understanding of high mobility group box-1 in the immunopathogenesis of incisional hernias.

Authors:  Nicholas K Larsen; Matthew J Reilly; Finosh G Thankam; Robert J Fitzgibbons; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 4.  Efficacy and safety of mesh closure in preventing wound failure following emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Albendary; Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed; Amin Alamin; Shantanu Rout; Anil George; Shafquat Zaman
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Delphi Consensus on Intraoperative Technical/Surgical Aspects to Prevent Surgical Site Infection after Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Jaime Ruiz-Tovar; Marja A Boermeester; Liliana Bordeianou; George J Chang; Emre Gorgun; Christoph Justinger; Elise H Lawson; David J Leaper; Najjia N Mahmoud; Christopher Mantyh; Michael F McGee; Valentine Nfonsam; Ines Rubio-Perez; Elizabeth C Wick; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.532

6.  Does small bite closure reduce the incidence of incisional hernia compared to standard mass closure for midline laparotomy?

Authors:  Kareemaldin Elsamani; Ahmed Abdel Rahim; Safaa Hamid
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-24

7.  Abdominal Wall Closure in Elective Midline Laparotomy: The Current Recommendations.

Authors:  René H Fortelny
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-05-23

8.  Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model.

Authors:  Y Yurtkap; F P J den Hartog; W van Weteringen; J Jeekel; G J Kleinrensink; J F Lange
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.739

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.