| Literature DB >> 31170185 |
Jinxi Wang1,2, Ruihua Dang3, Yoshiki Miyasaka2, Kousuke Hattori2, Daisuke Torigoe1, Tadashi Okamura4, Hassan T Tag-Ei-Din-Hassan1,5, Masami Morimatsu1, Tomoji Mashimo2, Takashi Agui1.
Abstract
The Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is an inherited disease that is controlled by multiple genes and has a complicated genetic mechanism. HSCR patients suffer from various extents of constipation due to dysplasia of the enteric nervous system (ENS), which can be so severe as to cause complete intestinal obstruction. Many genes have been identified as playing causative roles in ENS dysplasia and HSCR, among them the endothelin receptor type B gene (Ednrb) has been identified to play an important role. Mutation of Ednrb causes a series of symptoms that include deafness, pigmentary abnormalities, and aganglionosis. In our previous studies of three rat models carrying the same spotting lethal (sl) mutation on Ednrb, the haplotype of a region on chromosome (Chr) 2 was found to be responsible for the differing severities of the HSCR-like symptoms. To confirm that the haplotype of the responsible region on Chr 2 modifies the severity of aganglionosis caused by Ednrb mutation and to recreate a rat model with severe symptoms, we selected the GK inbred strain, whose haplotype in the responsible region on Chr 2 resembles that of the rat strain in which severe symptoms accompany the Ednrbsl mutation. An Ednrb mutation was introduced into the GK rat by crossing with F344-Ednrbsl and by genome editing. The null mutation of Ednrb was found to cause embryonic death in F2 progeny possessing the GK haplotype in the responsible region on Chr 2. The results of this study are unexpected, and they provide new clues and animal models that promise to contribute to studies on the genetic regulatory network in the development of ENS and on embryogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31170185 PMCID: PMC6553694 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The SNPs in the GK, AGH, F344, and LEH inbred strains.
| Gene | SNP Location | F344/LEH | AGH/GK |
|---|---|---|---|
| g.73985633, exon 1 | T/T | C/T | |
| g.73986958, promoter | G/G | A/G | |
| g.73987571, promoter | C/C | T/C | |
| g.76896910, promoter | C/C | T/T | |
| g.76897291, promoter | C/C | T/T | |
| g.76901040-76901042, intron 1 | TTA/TTA | -/TAA | |
| g.76901607, intron 1 | G/G | A/A | |
| g.76901863, intron 1 | -/G | -/- | |
| g.76917833-76917835, intron 2 | AAG/AAG | -/- | |
| g.76918613, intron 2 | C/C | A/A | |
| g.76918959, intron 2 | G/A | G/G | |
| g.76919179, intron 2 | C/C | T/T | |
| g.83715441, exon 2 | G/G | A/G | |
| g.83717275, exon 1 | C/C | T/C | |
| g.83717367, exon 1 | A/A | T/T | |
| g.83717975, promoter | A/A | -/- | |
| g.83718063, promoter | G/G | A/A | |
| g.83718133, promoter | G/G | A/A |
Fig 1The haplotype and phenotype of F2(F344 × GK)-Ednrb progeny.
(A) The 10-day-old offspring of F2(F344 × GK). Right, a pup carrying the Ednrb mutation showes very severe symptom. This pup has an obviously inflated intestine and a hypoplasia. Left, a healthy littermate. (B) The aganglionosis ratio and haplotype for 7 mutant F2 progeny. The aganglionosis severity was calculated as the aganglionosis ratio (agangliononic length divided by large intestine length). Four microsatellites located in the responsible region were selected for the genotyping of the F2(F344 × GK) generation, and the genotypes of microsatellite loci are listed in the table. F indicates the homozygous genotype of the F344 strain. H indicates the heterozygous genotype of GK and F344 rats. No mutant progeny that processed the homozygous genotype of the GK strain were found. (C) A schematic of the identified region on Chr 2. The candidate genes are marked in blue and the microsatellites are marked in red. The location of each marker and candidate gene is listed.
The number and ratio of 10-day-old pups possessing the genotype of each microsatellite in the F2(F344 × GK) generation.
| Genotype of | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F/F(%) | F/G(%) | G/G(%) | F/F(%) | F/G(%) | G/G(%) | F/F(%) | F/G(%) | G/G(%) | F/F(%) | F/G(%) | G/G(%) | |
| 6(31) | 8(42) | 5(26) | 6(31) | 8(42) | 5(26) | 6(31) | 8(42) | 5(26) | 7(37) | 7(37) | 5(26) | |
| 7(29) | 12(50) | 5(21) | 6(25) | 13(54) | 5(21) | 6(25) | 14(58) | 4(17) | 6(25) | 14(58) | 4(17) | |
| 2(28) | 5(71) | 2(28) | 5(71) | 2(28) | 5(71) | 3(43) | 4(57) | |||||
The genome-edited offspring in the F344 and GK strain.
| Strain | Gene | Number of transferred embryos | Number of litters (%) | Number of offspring (%) | WT offspring | Bi-allelic KO (Phenotype) | Heterozygote/Mosaic (Phenotype) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GK | 88 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100% | |
| 72 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100% | ||
| F344 | 23 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 50% | 50% |
a Calculate from the total number of female rats used as surrogate.
b Calculate from the total number of transferred embryos.