Literature DB >> 31168263

Can CRM Status on MRI Predict Survival in Rectal Cancers: Experience from the Indian Subcontinent.

Mihir Chandarana1,2, Supreeta Arya3, Jean-Louis de Menezes4, Reena Engineer5, Vikas Ostwal6, Prachi Patil7, Suman Kumar8, Rohit Dusane8, Ashwin D'souza9, Avanish Saklani9.   

Abstract

To determine the role of MRI as a predictor of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement. To study the impact of CRM status on MRI on recurrence and survival, in correlation with pathology. Analysis of a prospective database was performed over a period of 1 year. All patients with adenocarcinoma of rectum were included in the study. The MRI at presentation for all patients irrespective of stage (MRIT), pre-NACTRT MRI (MRI1) for patients with locally advanced tumours, and post-NACTRT MRI (MRI2) of these patients were analysed separately. The status of CRM on MRI was compared to that on histopathology and as a predictor of recurrence and survival. Two hundred twenty-one patients were included with a median follow-up 30 months. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were 50%, 65.46%, 5.63%, 96.95% and 64.85% for MRIT; 50%, 55.32%, 5.97%, 95.12% and 55.03% for MRI1; and 77.78%, 63.29%, 10.77%, 98.04% and 64.07% for MRI2, respectively. On multivariate analysis, pathological positive margin alone predicted a poor overall survival (OS) whereas involved CRM on pathology and MRIT predicted poorer disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence. Pre-treatment and post-treatment MRI scans have a moderate sensitivity, specificity and accuracy and a high negative predictive value to predict CRM status on pathology. Pathological CRM status is the only factor to impact OS, DFS and LR on multivariate analysis. CRM status on MRI at presentation (MRIT) does impact DFS and local recurrence but not OS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; Circumferential resection margin (CRM); MRI

Year:  2019        PMID: 31168263      PMCID: PMC6527632          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-00894-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  29 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Wibe; P R Rendedal; E Svensson; J Norstein; T J Eide; H E Myrvold; O Søreide
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shandra Bipat; Afina S Glas; Frederik J M Slors; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Phil Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  [Local recurrence and survival rate after rectal cancer operations and multimodal therapy].

Authors:  D Thomschke; B Kyau-Ummen; H J Halbfass
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Prognostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Martling; T Holm; S Bremmer; J Lindholm; B Cedermark; L Blomqvist
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Optimal methods for staging rectal cancer.

Authors:  V Raman Muthusamy; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Rectal cancer: MR imaging before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for prediction of tumor-free circumferential resection margins and long-term survival.

Authors:  Hinrich A Wieder; Robert Rosenberg; Florian Lordick; Hans Geinitz; Ambros Beer; Karen Becker; Klaus Woertler; Martin Dobritz; Jörg R Siewert; Ernst J Rummeny; Jens C Stollfuss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Comparison of CT and MRI in the pre-operative staging of rectal adenocarcinoma and prediction of circumferential resection margin involvement by MRI.

Authors:  P Mathur; J J Smith; C Ramsey; M Owen; A Thorpe; S Karim; C Burke; S Ramesh; P M Dawson
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Local recurrence of rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision without preoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christiaan P van Lingen; Clark J Zeebregts; Jos J G M Gerritsen; H Jan Mulder; Walter J B Mastboom; Joost M Klaase
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2003
View more
  1 in total

1.  Can Post-Treatment MRI Features Predict Pathological Circumferential Resection Margin (pCRM) Involvement in Low Rectal Tumors.

Authors:  A Patra; A D Baheti; S K Ankathi; A Desouza; R Engineer; V Ostwal; A Ramaswamy; A Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.