Literature DB >> 31165115

Bayesian machine learning for quantum molecular dynamics.

R V Krems1.   

Abstract

This article discusses applications of Bayesian machine learning for quantum molecular dynamics. One particular formulation of quantum dynamics advocated here is in the form of a machine learning simulator of the Schrödinger equation. If combined with the Bayesian statistics, such a simulator allows one to obtain not only the quantum predictions but also the error bars of the dynamical results associated with uncertainties of inputs (such as the potential energy surface or non-adiabatic couplings) into the nuclear Schrödinger equation. Instead of viewing atoms as undergoing dynamics on a given potential energy surface, Bayesian machine learning allows one to formulate the problem as the Schrödinger equation with a non-parametric distribution of potential energy surfaces that becomes conditioned by the desired dynamical properties (such as the experimental measurements). Machine learning models of the Schrödinger equation solutions can identify the sensitivity of the dynamical properties to different parts of the potential surface, the collision energy, angular momentum, external field parameters and basis sets used for the calculations. This can be used to inform the design of efficient quantum dynamics calculations. Machine learning models can also be used to correlate rigorous results with approximate calculations, providing accurate interpolation of exact results. Finally, there is evidence that it is possible to build Bayesian machine learning models capable of physically extrapolating the solutions of the Schrödinger equation. This is particularly valuable as such models could complement common discovery tools to explore physical properties at Hamiltonian parameters not accessible by rigorous quantum calculations or experiments, and potentially be used to accelerate the numerical integration of the nuclear Schrödinger equation.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31165115     DOI: 10.1039/c9cp01883b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  7 in total

1.  Machine Learning for Electronically Excited States of Molecules.

Authors:  Julia Westermayr; Philipp Marquetand
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Gaussian Process Regression for Materials and Molecules.

Authors:  Volker L Deringer; Albert P Bartók; Noam Bernstein; David M Wilkins; Michele Ceriotti; Gábor Csányi
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Quantitative molecular simulations.

Authors:  Kai Töpfer; Meenu Upadhyay; Markus Meuwly
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.945

4.  Applications of Machine Learning to In Silico Quantification of Chemicals without Analytical Standards.

Authors:  Dimitri Panagopoulos Abrahamsson; June-Soo Park; Randolph R Singh; Marina Sirota; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Combining SchNet and SHARC: The SchNarc Machine Learning Approach for Excited-State Dynamics.

Authors:  Julia Westermayr; Michael Gastegger; Philipp Marquetand
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.475

6.  HeH+ Collisions with H2: Rotationally Inelastic Cross Sections and Rate Coefficients from Quantum Dynamics at Interstellar Temperatures.

Authors:  K Giri; L González-Sánchez; Rupayan Biswas; E Yurtsever; F A Gianturco; N Sathyamurthy; U Lourderaj; R Wester
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.944

7.  A study on sex estimation by using machine learning algorithms with parameters obtained from computerized tomography images of the cranium.

Authors:  Seyma Toy; Yusuf Secgin; Zulal Oner; Muhammed Kamil Turan; Serkan Oner; Deniz Senol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.